Abortion , what do you anti-abortionists suggest to stop it??

[Vastator]

Every time one of these “Christian bitches” gets knocked up; it is because they cease to implement abstinence...
Sounds like you feel threatened by Christianity. No surprise there. People who lack principles often feel that way...

Exactly
Abstinence only works until the desire to fuk overwhelms you
Happens every time

“Overwhelms you”! LOL!!! You sound like a serial rapist... Normal humans have self control, and make choices. Only nutjobs and animals are beholden to emotion.
These women are fully responsible for their decision to abandon the practice of abstinence.

Actually they don't
Abstinence works up until it doesn't .....when those juices start flowing

Not until “it doesn’t”. What an absurd comment. It works period. If people choose not to adhere to it... Then they get, what they get.

Every pregnancy is a result of a failure of Abstinence

Abstinence is a choice just like having sex is a choice
Abstinence works until biological urges become too strong. Letting laid is a normal human function

Celibacy is not

Abstinence doesn’t fail. It works every single time. Fact. Every time a woman doesn’t have sex; she doesn’t get pregnant. (Aside from artificial insemination...)

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Ecclesiastic Clowns Shoes "

* Ascetic Clap Trap *

Abstinence doesn’t fail. It works every single time. Fact. Every time a woman doesn’t have sex; she doesn’t get pregnant. (Aside from artificial insemination...)

 

[JoeB131]

Well, you know, except for that one time that a virgin gave birth.

which never happened. Jesus never existed.

 

[Windparadox]

Abstinence doesn’t fail. It works every single time. Fact. Every time a woman doesn’t have sex; she doesn’t get pregnant. (Aside from artificial insemination...)

`
Every time a man keeps his penis zipped up in his pants, that works too.

 

[sparky]

It's not a difficult question.

Just difficult answers

So if a Military Dictatorship and a Communist Police State can't effectively end abortion, how can we?

we can't

it's a cultural thing

jmho


~S~

 

[Vastator]

Abstinence doesn’t fail. It works every single time. Fact. Every time a woman doesn’t have sex; she doesn’t get pregnant. (Aside from artificial insemination...)

`
Every time a man keeps his penis zipped up in his pants, that works too.

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

 

[Windparadox]

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

`
And it takes more than eager penis to do it (whether the female is willing or not)..... a penis which judging by your comments, has absolutely no self control. Men have both a penis and a brain but only enough blood to use one at a time.

 

[Unkotare]

Every time one of these “Christian bitches” gets knocked up; it is because they cease to implement abstinence...
Sounds like you feel threatened by Christianity. No surprise there. People who lack principles often feel that way...

Exactly
Abstinence only works until the desire to fuk overwhelms you
Happens every time

“Overwhelms you”! LOL!!! You sound like a serial rapist... Normal humans have self control, and make choices. Only nutjobs and animals are beholden to emotion.
These women are fully responsible for their decision to abandon the practice of abstinence.

Actually they don't
Abstinence works up until it doesn't .....when those juices start flowing

Not until “it doesn’t”. What an absurd comment. It works period. If people choose not to adhere to it... Then they get, what they get.

Every pregnancy is a result of a failure of Abstinence

Abstinence is a choice just like having sex is a choice
Abstinence works until biological urges become too strong. Letting laid is a normal human function

Celibacy is not

Typical democrat attitude. Mo-ist.

 

[JoeMoma]

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

`
And it takes more than eager penis to do it (whether the female is willing or not)..... a penis which judging by your comments, has absolutely no self control. Men have both a penis and a brain but only enough blood to use one at a time.

How 'bout both the man and woman exercise some self-control. It takes 2 to make a baby.

 

[Vastator]

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

`
And it takes more than eager penis to do it (whether the female is willing or not)..... a penis which judging by your comments, has absolutely no self control. Men have both a penis and a brain but only enough blood to use one at a time.

How 'bout both the man and woman exercise some self-control. It takes 2 to make a baby.

Reasonable. But as a woman, who must carry to term... The liability is greater on her to choose wisely. A man can run from a pregnancy. A woman cannot. She must choose wisely.

 

[JoeMoma]

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

`
And it takes more than eager penis to do it (whether the female is willing or not)..... a penis which judging by your comments, has absolutely no self control. Men have both a penis and a brain but only enough blood to use one at a time.

How 'bout both the man and woman exercise some self-control. It takes 2 to make a baby.

Reasonable. But as a woman, who must carry to term... The liability is greater on her to choose wisely. A man can run from a pregnancy. A woman cannot. She must choose wisely.

Actually, abortion is a woman's way of running from a pregnancy.

 

[Windparadox]

How 'bout both the man and woman exercise some self-control. It takes 2 to make a baby.

`
By jove, I think you're on to something!

 

[Cecilie1200]

Abstinence doesn’t fail. It works every single time. Fact. Every time a woman doesn’t have sex; she doesn’t get pregnant. (Aside from artificial insemination...)

`
Every time a man keeps his penis zipped up in his pants, that works too.

Um, yeah, that would fall under the heading of "abstinence". Did you need a definition of the word? Because you seem to be way too hung up on "How DARE you suggest women could be imperfect?!" to actually make sense.

 

[Vastator]

Every time a man whips out his dick; doesn’t result in pregnancy. Women are responsible for their getting pregnant; or not.

`
And it takes more than eager penis to do it (whether the female is willing or not)..... a penis which judging by your comments, has absolutely no self control. Men have both a penis and a brain but only enough blood to use one at a time.

How 'bout both the man and woman exercise some self-control. It takes 2 to make a baby.

Reasonable. But as a woman, who must carry to term... The liability is greater on her to choose wisely. A man can run from a pregnancy. A woman cannot. She must choose wisely.

Actually, abortion is a woman's way of running from a pregnancy.

People murder for a variety of reasons. If that’s on the table... I suppose the man could kill the woman to avoid the pregnancy also... I guess it comes down to how comfortable you are with killing people...

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Ethical Valuation Of Contempt For Sentience Removed "

* Ethical Valuation Of Unfounded Empathy For Sentience Not Obtained *

People murder for a variety of reasons. If that’s on the table... I suppose the man could kill the woman to avoid the pregnancy also... I guess it comes down to how comfortable you are with killing people...

Before one enters into a social civil contract as a citizen , with protected wrights according to a constitution ( reprise for violation ) , there are only natural freedoms ; as such , to improve ones odds of survival and quality of life , one exchanges natural freedoms for citizenship .

Within the context of a social civil contract , removing a wright to life of another with a protected wright to life is murder , as well it is a double entendre whereby the perpetrator removes their own wright to life in the process ; and , whether that wright is restored by the social civil contract to the perpetrator is a matter of jurisprudence ; else , the perpetrator is subject to natural freedoms and dispatched .

Within the context of the us constitution , for equal protection with a citizen , an entity must meet the requirement of birth , which is why a non viable faeioutys does not have a wright to life .

Ones comfort with killing other hue mammon beings depends much on circumstance .

 

[AveryJarhman]

#TheLargerIssue #Fatherlessness #ChildNeglectMaltreatment #MentalHealth #Solutions

Penelope wrote, "Have men get a lock put on penis at age 10 (able to be taken off to cleanse area and adjust for getting engorged, should make the contraption pliable. Remember it only takes a look at a boob or female to make a man horny."

​

Who considers or views ten-year-old boys as men?

According to this adult female round-table discussion females are years ahead of males when it comes to enjoying sex.

"Learning to Masturbate":

Tune.pk

Frankly, I'm thinking filling preteen vaginas with rubber cement may be the solution...though more practically, when 9-year-old girls are fantasizing about engaging in sex with "much older men" it make sense to affix a Contraceptive Patch to young, horny, preteen females.

Penelope, do you agree? If not, why?

[End facetious post]

 

[AveryJarhman]

TheLargerIssue Fatherlessness ChildNeglectMaltreatment MentalHealth Solutions

As far as I am concerned abortion is a safe, LEGAL medical procedure used by American or foreign born women choosing to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

I also believe MENTAL issues are affecting citizens choosing to HATEFULLY denigrate and shame as " MURDERERS" my free thinking American neighbors choosing to peacefully pursue their inalienable to L, L, (Love) and Happiness when lawfully terminating a life changing unwanted pregnancy.

Peace.
___
American *(Children's)* Lives Matter; Take Pride In Parenting; End Our National Health Crisis; Child Abuse and Neglect;

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

" Delusions Of Grandeur About Hue Mammon Apes "

* Fallacious Terminology *

Sure a baby may not be perfect so someone may want to kill it in the womb. Big deal. That doesn't mean everyone else has to sanction you murdering a baby in the womb.

A baby babbles and represents a period between birth and childhood ; hence , a baby and a faeioutys are not equivalent and the former does not exist in the womb .

Post parturition , when one meets the criteria of birth for equal protection , then - by definition ( see legal positivism ) a murder may be defined , but until then the faeioutys is the private property of the mother .

Sorry you can't legally own a human being even though you are bound to be responsible for that being as a child unless you give that right away. That baby in the womb is a separate being even though its life depends on the mother's life being sustain.

Wrong.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

It is a settled, accepted fact of Constitutional law – beyond dispute – that prior to birth an embryo/fetus is not a ‘person’ entitled to Constitutional protections (see Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)).

I'd say you have issues.

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence.

At least you're consistent at being wrong.

Fetal ‘homicide’ laws are about politics, not the law – bad faith contrivances designed to appease the social right that in no manner recognize an embryo/fetus as a ‘person’ entitled to Constitutional protections.

And clearly you’re ignorant of the fact that every fetal ‘homicide’ law has a provision excluding abortion.

 

[RodISHI]

" Delusions Of Grandeur About Hue Mammon Apes "

* Fallacious Terminology *

Sure a baby may not be perfect so someone may want to kill it in the womb. Big deal. That doesn't mean everyone else has to sanction you murdering a baby in the womb.

A baby babbles and represents a period between birth and childhood ; hence , a baby and a faeioutys are not equivalent and the former does not exist in the womb .

Post parturition , when one meets the criteria of birth for equal protection , then - by definition ( see legal positivism ) a murder may be defined , but until then the faeioutys is the private property of the mother .

Sorry you can't legally own a human being even though you are bound to be responsible for that being as a child unless you give that right away. That baby in the womb is a separate being even though its life depends on the mother's life being sustain.

Wrong.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

It is a settled, accepted fact of Constitutional law – beyond dispute – that prior to birth an embryo/fetus is not a ‘person’ entitled to Constitutional protections (see Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)).

I'd say you have issues.

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence.

At least you're consistent at being wrong.

Fetal ‘homicide’ laws are about politics, not the law – bad faith contrivances designed to appease the social right that in no manner recognize an embryo/fetus as a ‘person’ entitled to Constitutional protections.

And clearly you’re ignorant of the fact that every fetal ‘homicide’ law has a provision excluding abortion.

Apparently you must believe also that you would have been better off had you been aborted.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Remember its takes a male and female to make a zygote

This is the root Of the abortion problem.
Someday you will be ashamed