Except of forcing itself on a woman without her consent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except of forcing itself on a woman without her consent.
All my arguments have been within the logical framework of science and rights. When you couldn't respond any longer you decided to lash out. You are obviously the emotional one.Emotion is the sole basis of your ridiculous, baseless, completely manufactured aregument.
There's certainly no logic or reasoning present in your argument.,
If it isn't apart of the mother then what does it need the mother for. Surely this independent life that takes nothing from the mother can survive outside of her then.It isn't part of the mother, it has it's own DNA and can have even a different blood type.
Unless something goes wrong, there's not even a direct exchange of blood between the mother and baby.
It's natural habitat however is in the uterus where the mother created it until it is ready to be born full term.
So the 63 million abortions were all rapes? By Prog agendas the result of two people copulating without be responsible for the results becomes a criminal act when abortion is used to correct it.They are not innocent of forcing themselves on women against their will. As independent lives, we get to defend ourselves from that sort of thing.
I wasn't talking about rape. And getting an abortion after pregnancy resulting in sex is being responsible.So the 63 million abortions were all rapes? By Prog agendas the result of two people copulating without be responsible for the results becomes a criminal act when abortion is used to correct it.
You sound like Kramer on Seinfeld.Or maybe you're just incapable of forming one and want to hide that fact.
So you've really got nothing but forcing women to give birth.....What you said is so completely absurd it doesn't deserve a serious counter argument.