I'm for this. Abstaining from premarital sex is still the best method. However, more and more women seem to be following the Universe 25 Experiment phase of woman disassociating with men for traditional family structures. This includes the feminization of men as well. All those who support all the woke crap really need to google this study which was done about 25 times with the same destruction of the natural society.
You are the misleader on this subject. You changed the make up of the Godhead and much, much more of the doctrines of Christ. It's you that is doing the work of Satan and killing the God of Israel.
Women becoming more independent is nothing but a positive aspect for the nation. I'm happy to see less and less stuck in the get married have kids if that is not what they want. It strengthens the nation.
You are guilty as served attempting to kill God.
you are a religious quack. This is tissue, like a cancerous growth. Excise the tissue and let the patient heal.You seem to be lost on this. A strong nation only exists when the nuclear family is strong. That is a family with a male, female and children. It's the core strength of a strong nation. With that said, I also want to see women make sure they can support themselves and their children if their husbands divorce them or if the husbands die. Get an education and also have back up plans for earning money. Having children is never a drawback for a strong family and nation. Any nation having fewer and fewer children is domed. As the population grows, so can the economy. Having more children is crucial for the economic strength of any nation. See what has happened to China and why they are struggling with their past restrictions on children.
The difference between sex and gender is that sex is related with genetics .
Ah, if only life were so simple. Take John 7:53-8:11 for instance. A great story about Jesus that, almost certainly, never happened.
God said he's a little devil at times
Looking at either group of people that way is pure evil. It's simply bigotry and hatred towards others.
You are wrong. It really did happen, but it wasn't recorded correctly. Eyewitnesses can be unreliable.
Christians know that none of that is literally true. They're just all afraid to say so, except for Ding. He blew the whistle on the alllegorical bibles, months ago.
The essentials of christen dome lay with inn anti-nomian ethos , which conjectures that ' by no name will a law be made ' .
Such nonsense. The old good is evil and evil is good argument. Shows no ability to have a firm foundation of good and right.
The correct terms would be " good and correct " , whereas such an application of the term right is slang and absurd dogma that insults any science of political principles - Chirality - Wikipedia .
Consider antinomianism ethos that supposes by no name will a law be made , where by sacrifice one individual absolves another individual of punishment for some law and is granted forgiveness , thus for not having done so begrudgingly against others , would such an action be good or evil ?
An antinomian is one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation. It does not negate good or evil. It merely suggests they think they have a hall pass to do evil. Thanks a lot reformation.
