Zone1 Abortion and Transgender is Demonic

" Consequences Of Success Or Failure By Applying Principalities In Nature "

* Simplistic Explanations Fore Salvation From Regret Through Uniform Fetish *

An antinomian is one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation. It does not negate good or evil. It merely suggests they think they have a hall pass to do evil. Thanks a lot reformation.
The theory of antinomianism is paradoxical and consequently includes contradiction .

The subjective ego discriminates between advantages versus disadvantages , and discerns between beneficial versus detrimental consequences , between good versus bad , while personification of willful intents by extant deities , as a dichotomy of good versus evil , is an over simplified motif for fantasy that is relegated to fiction genre .

Yearn fantasies to personify , to animate , to project psycho logical perceptions onto events within nature , so as to make competent decisions , is not emphatically dysfunctional , rather it is when psycho logical perceptions are extended into public policy and are deleterious that they are dysfunctional , such as when public policies violate principles of non violence , principles of individualism and principles of equitable doctrine , which expect equal protection among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , or a corporate , or a collective state , or a collective federate , or a civil litigant .

An essence of antinomianism ethos includes absolution from ethical mistakes , irrespective of whether ethical mistakes are committed with intentions that may be described as good , or bad , or indifferent ; does antinomian theory expect that absolution only be entitled when adopting a commitment for intentions that are good ?

How valid would it be to be absolved of grief , of remorse , of anxiety for mortality , through repentance , when the literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , so that by a requisite sophisticated state another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience sentience , sapience and introspection that afforded as life ?

Is it wise for adults to misconstrue the literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with the metaphorical means by which to achieve an actual after life , such as through social and political constructs ?
 
" Principles Of Non Violence And Individualism With Equal Protection Of Negative Liberties Among Individuals "

* Existentialism Of Absolution Through Paradox Versus Nomian Noahide Decalogue Legalism Proposed For A Life To Come *


The essentials of christen dome lay with inn anti-nomian ethos , which conjectures that ' by no name will a law be made ' .

The Jewish Encyclopedia article on "Gentile: Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah"[65] notes the following reconciliation: "R. Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam,"[66] gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law — this explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath."[66]

The theological basis for the seven commandments of the Noahic Covenant is said to be derived interpretatively from demands addressed to Adam[19] and to Noah,[20] who are believed to be the progenitors of humankind in Judaism, and therefore to be regarded as universal moral laws.[13][21] The seven commandments of the Noahic Covenant enumerated in the Babylonian Talmud (Avodah Zarah 8:4, Sanhedrin 56a-b) are:[24]
Do not worship idols.[25]
Do not curse God.[26]
Do not murder.[27]
Do not commit adultery or sexual immorality.[28]
Do not steal.[29]
Do not eat flesh torn from a living animal.[30]
Establish courts of justice.[32]
According to the American Roman Catholic priest and dogmatic theologian Bruce R. Barnes, the obligation to follow the Noahic Covenant and its seven commandments was incumbent upon the Jewish people as well, and remained effective for them until the Ten Commandments were given to Moses on Mount Sinai:[13]
Like I said, Christians know that the bibles aren't literally true.
More modern Christians attempt to make it out to be allegory.

I have no argument against it being allegory if it can make sense to interpret it that way.

Stories such as the great flood don't seem to have even that! Does it?

All sensible people know by now that it can't be a true story
 
" Playing With Surds By Presuming Absolution From Guilt Without Granting It "

* Contradictions Of Paradox *


Consider antinomianism ethos that supposes by no name will a law be made , where by sacrifice one individual absolves another individual of punishment for some law and is granted forgiveness , thus for not having done so begrudgingly against others , would such an action be good or evil ?
If you don’t know the difference between good and evil, then the light of Christ has been extinguished in your conscience.
 
Except you really haven't been able to make the argument that Transgender is "evil", other than you think it's icky.

As for abortion, it depends on whether or not you think Globby the Fetus is a person or not.
The difference between you and me is I have a firm foundation of truth. The liberal left foundation is of sand and shifts based on what society thinks at various times. Clinton signed the marriage act that made marriage between only a man and a woman. Then the liberal left including the Clintons changed as the loony liberal left decided you could marry your horse too. Same with abortion as well.
 
" Consequences Of Success Or Failure By Applying Principalities In Nature "

* Simplistic Explanations Fore Salvation From Regret Through Uniform Fetish *


The theory of antinomianism is paradoxical and consequently includes contradiction .

The subjective ego discriminates between advantages versus disadvantages , and discerns between beneficial versus detrimental consequences , between good versus bad , while personification of willful intents by extant deities , as a dichotomy of good versus evil , is an over simplified motif for fantasy that is relegated to fiction genre .

Yearn fantasies to personify , to animate , to project psycho logical perceptions onto events within nature , so as to make competent decisions , is not emphatically dysfunctional , rather it is when psycho logical perceptions are extended into public policy and are deleterious that they are dysfunctional , such as when public policies violate principles of non violence , principles of individualism and principles of equitable doctrine , which expect equal protection among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , or a corporate , or a collective state , or a collective federate , or a civil litigant .

An essence of antinomianism ethos includes absolution from ethical mistakes , irrespective of whether ethical mistakes are committed with intentions that may be described as good , or bad , or indifferent ; does antinomian theory expect that absolution only be entitled when adopting a commitment for intentions that are good ?

How valid would it be to be absolved of grief , of remorse , of anxiety for mortality , through repentance , when the literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , so that by a requisite sophisticated state another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience sentience , sapience and introspection that afforded as life ?

Is it wise for adults to misconstrue the literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with the metaphorical means by which to achieve an actual after life , such as through social and political constructs ?
Not exactly. It’s lip service.
 
Like I said, Christians know that the bibles aren't literally true.
More modern Christians attempt to make it out to be allegory.

I have no argument against it being allegory if it can make sense to interpret it that way.

Stories such as the great flood don't seem to have even that! Does it?

All sensible people know by now that it can't be a true story
There are many questions that archeologists and scientists can't explain still. Like, The age of a rock by carbon dating. The half-life and age determination of Carbon-14 is 5,730 years. As the hyperbole curve goes, 60,000 years is the longest time back that dating can be used. Then, there is scientific proof that rocks and layers of rocks were formed quickly and not over millions or billions of years. But, thousands or even hundreds of years. Then, there are fossil records of human footprints in the same layers as dinosaurs. And, it goes on and on.

The anti-flood people then use statements that make no sense like how could the ark have held millions of different animals when the bible doesn't say that. Or, how could the planet be covered with 30,000 feet of water when the most likely reason would be that there were no huge mountain ranges at that time. It was the violence of the waters from the deep that broke up the land into continents and faults that created the high mountain ranges while covering the earth. There's a lot of other what ifs. But, you should understand you don't have all the facts. None of us do.
 
" Fantasy Systems Of Adversarial Cognate Entities "

* Nut Jobs *

If you don’t know the difference between good and evil, then the light of Christ has been extinguished in your conscience.
You would perceive of a tiger eating a pig as an act that is not evil , but perceive a tiger eating a human as an act instigated by an evil entity , while not perceiving the tiger itself as evil .

How many thank goad for surviving a great calamity , while ignoring that goad is conjectured also to have caused it , yet for expedience of not acknowledging the latter , a scapegoat is instantiated .
 
Why do you say that?
It doesn't appear in scripture until the Middle Ages. Seems unlikely the story was known to John but he didn't put it in. It's just too good to have been overlooked.
 
It doesn't appear in scripture until the Middle Ages. Seems unlikely the story was known to John but he didn't put it in. It's just too good to have been overlooked.
So because the biblical canon evolved over time it has to be made up?
 
" Fantasy Systems Of Adversarial Cognate Entities "

* Nut Jobs *


You would perceive of a tiger eating a pig as an act that is not evil , but perceive a tiger eating a human as an act instigated by an evil entity , while not perceiving the tiger itself as evil .

How many thank goad for surviving a great calamity , while ignoring that goad is conjectured also to have caused it , yet for expedience of not acknowledging the latter , a scapegoat is instantiated .
Why would a tiger be able to do evil? Evil is what humans do contrary to God's laws and commandments. Contrary to the covenants we make with him. Animals aren't evil.
Why do you say God causes calamities? Humans cause many calamities by ignoring and doing contrary to the laws and commandments of God. God's laws and commandments are for us to use to lessen calamities and living a long and prosperous life.
 
That is what you have been told but you have no proof, only faith, that it is the truth.
Yes i have faith. Its what is required.
Because all who draw close to God( Jehovah) he draws close to them. They know 100% he is there.
 
You are the misleader on this subject. You changed the make up of the Godhead and much, much more of the doctrines of Christ. It's you that is doing the work of Satan and killing the God of Israel.
Fact-Catholicism changed God centuries ago. Its recorded history-FACT.
 
The Trinity is in the Old Testament. While not fully revealed or called that, it’s all there when you read it. See the Angel of God who is God and has the power to forgive sins.
There is no trinity in the bible-( YHVH)Jehovah =The Abrahamic God= a single being God.
 
What does that even mean? Why didn't the story appear until Jesus was dead for 1,000 years?
It means biblical cannon evolved. It's wasn't a secret. Congratulations on discovering it.
 
Back
Top Bottom