Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,111
- 1,018
- 140
" Consequences Of Success Or Failure By Applying Principalities In Nature "
* Simplistic Explanations Fore Salvation From Regret Through Uniform Fetish *
The subjective ego discriminates between advantages versus disadvantages , and discerns between beneficial versus detrimental consequences , between good versus bad , while personification of willful intents by extant deities , as a dichotomy of good versus evil , is an over simplified motif for fantasy that is relegated to fiction genre .
Yearn fantasies to personify , to animate , to project psycho logical perceptions onto events within nature , so as to make competent decisions , is not emphatically dysfunctional , rather it is when psycho logical perceptions are extended into public policy and are deleterious that they are dysfunctional , such as when public policies violate principles of non violence , principles of individualism and principles of equitable doctrine , which expect equal protection among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , or a corporate , or a collective state , or a collective federate , or a civil litigant .
An essence of antinomianism ethos includes absolution from ethical mistakes , irrespective of whether ethical mistakes are committed with intentions that may be described as good , or bad , or indifferent ; does antinomian theory expect that absolution only be entitled when adopting a commitment for intentions that are good ?
How valid would it be to be absolved of grief , of remorse , of anxiety for mortality , through repentance , when the literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , so that by a requisite sophisticated state another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience sentience , sapience and introspection that afforded as life ?
Is it wise for adults to misconstrue the literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with the metaphorical means by which to achieve an actual after life , such as through social and political constructs ?
* Simplistic Explanations Fore Salvation From Regret Through Uniform Fetish *
The theory of antinomianism is paradoxical and consequently includes contradiction .An antinomian is one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation. It does not negate good or evil. It merely suggests they think they have a hall pass to do evil. Thanks a lot reformation.
The subjective ego discriminates between advantages versus disadvantages , and discerns between beneficial versus detrimental consequences , between good versus bad , while personification of willful intents by extant deities , as a dichotomy of good versus evil , is an over simplified motif for fantasy that is relegated to fiction genre .
Yearn fantasies to personify , to animate , to project psycho logical perceptions onto events within nature , so as to make competent decisions , is not emphatically dysfunctional , rather it is when psycho logical perceptions are extended into public policy and are deleterious that they are dysfunctional , such as when public policies violate principles of non violence , principles of individualism and principles of equitable doctrine , which expect equal protection among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , or a corporate , or a collective state , or a collective federate , or a civil litigant .
An essence of antinomianism ethos includes absolution from ethical mistakes , irrespective of whether ethical mistakes are committed with intentions that may be described as good , or bad , or indifferent ; does antinomian theory expect that absolution only be entitled when adopting a commitment for intentions that are good ?
How valid would it be to be absolved of grief , of remorse , of anxiety for mortality , through repentance , when the literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , so that by a requisite sophisticated state another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience sentience , sapience and introspection that afforded as life ?
Is it wise for adults to misconstrue the literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with the metaphorical means by which to achieve an actual after life , such as through social and political constructs ?