ABC's David Muir sees newscast ratings decline after controversial debate performance

[shockedcanadian]

Good. Disney needs to pay a steeper price for their creepy tactics. Let these weirdos open their parks in the countries in which their masters reside.

ABC's David Muir sees newscast ratings decline after controversial debate performance

ABC anchor David Muir's nightly newscast has seen a ratings decline in the days since the presidential debate he co-moderated between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

www.foxnews.com

ABC’s "World News Tonight" anchor David Muir may have driven away some viewers after the Disney-owned network irked conservatives during last week’s presidential debate.

Muir and co-moderator Linsey Davis fact-checked former President Trump five times without ever correcting Vice President Kamala Harris, prompting a plethora of conservatives to suggest the debate wasn’t fair. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America even called for a correction after Davis made an abortion claim made during the debate during one of the fact-checks on Trump that the group said was "100% inaccurate."

Muir’s "World News Tonight" averaged 6.7 million viewers on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, the three episodes following the debate, after averaging 7.6 million in 2024 leading up to the debate.

 

[IM2]

You are citing from a network that paid 700 milion dollars for lying.

 

[shockedcanadian]

You are citing from a network that paid 700 milion dollars for lying.

Let 'er sink. Well earned.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Sink like the Titanic!

 

[BackAgain]

You are citing from a network that paid 700 milion dollars for lying.

Fallacy ^ of attack the messenger.

The topic isn’t Fox News, you leftwing shithead.

The real question is whether the information provided by Fox News in this case is properly sourced and credible.

Can you answer that one, you stupid fuckstick?

 

[Darkwind]

Fallacy ^ of attack the messenger.

The topic isn’t Fox News, you leftwing shithead.

The real question is whether the information provided by Fox News in this case is properly sourced and credible.

Can you answer that one, you stupid fuckstick?

You know he can't, but even worse. You know he doesn't care.

 

[BackAgain]

You know he can't, but even worse. You know he doesn't care.

True. But I have to admit something.

The article from Fox News may have been based on the numbers generated by the companies who monitor audiences. Akin to the Nielsen folks. HOWEVER, the Fox News piece fails to so much as offer its own source.