jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,953
- 34,797
- 2,180
Exactly, no cross. without cross, the hearing is bullshit third world nonsenseThere is no source for such
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly, no cross. without cross, the hearing is bullshit third world nonsenseThere is no source for such
But you didn't watch it, Ray.
That's all just childish. Trump did much more stuff deserving of negative stories. Was it unfair that Nixon received so many negative stories? Of course it wasn't unfair. Nixon got what he deserved, and Trump got what he deserved as well.
No, imbecile..Exactly, no cross. without cross, the hearing is bullshit third world nonsense
But you don't know "communist" from "Easter bonnet"I watch very little entertainment. I certainly wouldn't watch a communist production.
There’s no cross to show the nonsense. No impeachment of a witness allowed, hmmm third world nonsenseNo, imbecile..
There is no alternate narrative with which to challenge the known testimony.
I have no idea.and ah,,who was it that said "to the effect of" a few times and world just kept laffing at her?
Try to understand...There’s no cross to show the nonsense
I know you have no idea or you would have posted where he is wrongBut you don't know "communist" from "Easter bonnet"
Hahaha hahaha no cross means illegitimateTry to understand...
You can't cross what you have no way to contradict.
With the exception of Meadows and Big Loserstink, everyone present has testified...under oath.
With what will you impeach their testimony?
It's not hard, moron. Anyone who says the rich need to pay their fair share is a communist.But you don't know "communist" from "Easter bonnet"
Anyone defending that Stalinist show trial is a fucking traitor.Try to understand...
You can't cross what you have no way to contradict.
With the exception of Meadows and Big Loserstink, everyone present has testified...under oath.
With what will you impeach their testimony?
But you don't know "communist" from "Easter bonnet"
Why is an alternate narrative required? Facts are sufficient to challenge any testimony.No, imbecile..
There is no alternate narrative with which to challenge the known testimony.
Ray,Sure I do. I went to the US Communist party website. Their agenda is not that much different than the Democrat party. Try it sometime and see for yourself.
What facts?Why is an alternate narrative required? Facts are sufficient to challenge any testimony.
You're an idiot, Bri..Anyone defending that Stalinist show trial is a fucking traitor.
Ray,
You're a simpleton.
Everything you post is a lie.Post my lie, Bri...
Ray,I'm a simpleton because I do my homework? Afraid to take my challenge apparently. If the devil comes to take your soul, do you think he will tell you he's the devil?