Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 46,290
- 20,144
- 2,173
Your claim is baseless.I can see things much more clearly than you. That’s clear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your claim is baseless.I can see things much more clearly than you. That’s clear.
Right! It was ‘very fine people on both sides’ and not "good people." Trump's defense makes it worse. He said his statement was an excellent statement as he was making statements before he had all the facts. LOLStart with the already long refuted one about “good people” on both sides.
Or try the intentional lie about Project 2025.
Now then: please tell us when the hack moderators ever once attempted to correct any of her lies.
Yours was. As usual.Your claim is baseless.
Facebook said the exact opposite.Being pressured means it wasn’t their decision.
A hypothetical is not a claim.Yours was. As usual.
I’ve already batted your ignorant ass a round enough for one day.
Take a breath. Go have yourself a little cry.
Come back after you compose yourself.
Being pressured to make a decision. It's still a decision made. Bowing to pressure can be see in different ways, but "your Honor, my client wasn't ignorant of the law. He was just pressured to break the law"Being pressured means it wasn’t their decision.
You’re proved wrong yet again, ya quibbling little mutt.![]()
Again: the quibbling little mutt known as the dainty tries to have it both ways.Right! It was ‘very fine people on both sides’ and not "good people." Trump's defense makes it worse. He said his statement was an excellent statement as he was making statements before he had all the facts. LOL
We've all seen the photos and reports of Trump being with the project 2025 leaders. He's running form it like a Trump with his hair on fire.
What lies? And attacking the moderators as hacks is like inadvertently showing your hand at the poker table. You lose.
Your attempts at arguments aren’t arguments.A hypothetical is not a claim.
A hypothetical isn’t even an argument.Your attempts at arguments aren’t arguments.
"Trump did say there were "very fine people on both sides," referring to the protesters and the counterprotesters."Again: the quibbling little mutt known as the dainty tries to have it both ways.
He said what he said in a context, troll boi.
You choose to ignore or redefine that context. That’s the heart of your fail.
I don’t place a lot of credence in Snopes, but even they call bullshit on the dainty:
![]()
No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'
However, the accuracy of what Trump did claim – that there were "very fine people on both sides" of the 2017 Unite the Right debacle – is in question.www.snopes.com
Liberal hacks shouldn't be moderators. These two are two of the biggest hacks out there.
Liberal hacks shouldn't be moderators. These two are two of the biggest hacks out there.
Actually she’s quite the fan of Trump.Megyn Kelly, certainly no fan of Donald Trump, also blasted the moderators for blatant bias. The worst she has ever witnessed she said.
Thanks for sharing your vapid and baseless speculation.A hypothetical isn’t even an argument.
It’s a question. Trump couldn’t answer it because he’s afraid to.
Your attempts at arguments aren’t arguments.
Another massive fail by the dainty."Trump did say there were "very fine people on both sides," referring to the protesters and the counterprotesters."
A hypothetical isn’t even an argument.
It’s a question. Trump couldn’t answer it because he’s afraid to.
Never mind that the Surpreme Court said it clearly.False. It’s a state matter, not a national matter. You moron.
They reversed themselves? Dem Congress will eventually fix that.Never mind that the Surpreme Court said it clearly.
The left needs that boogey man off of life support so they can appeal to him due to their lack of policy.