Abbas suggests Obama promised 67 lines - E. Jerusalem

[montelatici]

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem consisted of Palestine and holdings in Syria and Lebanon. Palestine is referred to in histories of the Latin Kingdom, including the most respected written by LIEUT.-COL. C. R CONDER. The table of contents is below. Palestine existed within the Christian state and prior as a province within an Arab Caliphate. All these attempts to deligitimize the rights of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine are infantile.



THE



LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.



1099 TO 1291 A.D.



BY



LIEUT.-COL. C:*R:' CONDER, LL.D., M.R.A.S., R.E.,

Author of " Tent Work in Palestine" " Heth and Moab" etc.




PUBLISHED BY THE

COMMITTEE OF THE PALESTINE EXPLORATION FUND,
24, HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON.

1897.
[All rights reserved. ]




V



LONDON :

HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HER MAJESTY.
ST. MARTIN'S LANE.




CONTENTS.



PAGE

PREFACE v.

CHAP, I. PETER THE HERMIT . i

,, II. THE MARCH TO ANTIOCH ... 28

,, III. THE FOUNDING OF THE KINGDOM 55

,, IV. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM 75

,, V. THE Loss OF THE KINGDOM 119

,, VI. THE FRANK LIFE IN PALESTINE 161

VII. THE NATIVE LIFE IN PALESTINE 215

., VIII. THE THIRD CRUSADE 251

,, IX. THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANKS 294

,, X. ST. Louis ... ... ... ... ... ... 344

,, XL THE TARTARS 366

,, XII. THE Loss OF ACRE 386

CONCLUSION .. ... 414

INDEX 429



H 2



MAPS.



MAP OF WESTERN PALESTINE SHEWING THE LATIN
FIEFS .. -

 

[toastman]

What attempts are you referring to??

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem consisted of Palestine and holdings in Syria and Lebanon. Palestine is referred to in histories of the Latin Kingdom, including the most respected written by LIEUT.-COL. C. R CONDER. The table of contents is below. Palestine existed within the Christian state and prior as a province within an Arab Caliphate. All these attempts to deligitimize the rights of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine are infantile.



THE



LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.



1099 TO 1291 A.D.



BY



LIEUT.-COL. C:*R:' CONDER, LL.D., M.R.A.S., R.E.,

Author of " Tent Work in Palestine" " Heth and Moab" etc.




PUBLISHED BY THE

COMMITTEE OF THE PALESTINE EXPLORATION FUND,
24, HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON.

1897.
[All rights reserved. ]




V



LONDON :

HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HER MAJESTY.
ST. MARTIN'S LANE.




CONTENTS.



PAGE

PREFACE v.

CHAP, I. PETER THE HERMIT . i

,, II. THE MARCH TO ANTIOCH ... 28

,, III. THE FOUNDING OF THE KINGDOM 55

,, IV. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM 75

,, V. THE Loss OF THE KINGDOM 119

,, VI. THE FRANK LIFE IN PALESTINE 161

VII. THE NATIVE LIFE IN PALESTINE 215

., VIII. THE THIRD CRUSADE 251

,, IX. THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANKS 294

,, X. ST. Louis ... ... ... ... ... ... 344

,, XL THE TARTARS 366

,, XII. THE Loss OF ACRE 386

CONCLUSION .. ... 414

INDEX 429



H 2



MAPS.



MAP OF WESTERN PALESTINE SHEWING THE LATIN
FIEFS .. -

Yes, I am aware of the Kingdom of Jerusalem which was created under the Christian Crusaders. It was called the Kingdom of Jerusalem, not Palestine. It was destroyed by the Muslims.

 

[Sallow]

And you would be wrong again as the German leaders were Satanists, and Hitler is alleged to have converted to islam.

My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942

Which only proves that he was Christian warped by his Jew hated even then. Tony Blair was a Protestant right up until he resigned as Prime Minister and then he became a catholic. When Hitler came to power he was already a Satanist, and empowered his followers to devise a new German religion based on Aryan principles but with some Christianity thrown in.


Want to try again using his speeches from 1936 to 1945

Really now?

So was Martin Luther a "Satanist" when he wrote this?

On the Jews and Their Lies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about King Charlamange when he forced conversions?
Charlemagne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And all the other folks..

Forced conversion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You folks have a long and bloody history.

 

[toastman]

Which only proves that he was Christian warped by his Jew hated even then. Tony Blair was a Protestant right up until he resigned as Prime Minister and then he became a catholic. When Hitler came to power he was already a Satanist, and empowered his followers to devise a new German religion based on Aryan principles but with some Christianity thrown in.


Want to try again using his speeches from 1936 to 1945

Really now?

So was Martin Luther a "Satanist" when he wrote this?

On the Jews and Their Lies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about King Charlamange when he forced conversions?
Charlemagne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And all the other folks..

Forced conversion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You folks have a long and bloody history.

What exactly are you trying to say?

 

[montelatici]

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem consisted of Palestine and holdings in Syria and Lebanon. Palestine is referred to in histories of the Latin Kingdom, including the most respected written by LIEUT.-COL. C. R CONDER. The table of contents is below. Palestine existed within the Christian state and prior as a province within an Arab Caliphate. All these attempts to deligitimize the rights of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine are infantile.



THE



LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.



1099 TO 1291 A.D.



BY



LIEUT.-COL. C:*R:' CONDER, LL.D., M.R.A.S., R.E.,

Author of " Tent Work in Palestine" " Heth and Moab" etc.




PUBLISHED BY THE

COMMITTEE OF THE PALESTINE EXPLORATION FUND,
24, HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON.

1897.
[All rights reserved. ]




V



LONDON :

HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HER MAJESTY.
ST. MARTIN'S LANE.




CONTENTS.



PAGE

PREFACE v.

CHAP, I. PETER THE HERMIT . i

,, II. THE MARCH TO ANTIOCH ... 28

,, III. THE FOUNDING OF THE KINGDOM 55

,, IV. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM 75

,, V. THE Loss OF THE KINGDOM 119

,, VI. THE FRANK LIFE IN PALESTINE 161

VII. THE NATIVE LIFE IN PALESTINE 215

., VIII. THE THIRD CRUSADE 251

,, IX. THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANKS 294

,, X. ST. Louis ... ... ... ... ... ... 344

,, XL THE TARTARS 366

,, XII. THE Loss OF ACRE 386

CONCLUSION .. ... 414

INDEX 429



H 2



MAPS.



MAP OF WESTERN PALESTINE SHEWING THE LATIN
FIEFS .. -

Yes, I am aware of the Kingdom of Jerusalem which was created under the Christian Crusaders. It was called the Kingdom of Jerusalem, not Palestine. It was destroyed by the Muslims.

It was called the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem and Palestine was the main holding. Your position would deny that England or Wales exist because they are part of the United Kingdom. Silly position to take.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The Brits made this abundantly clear. PLEASE consider your statement refuted!

1988 has no relevance to the question of the status of Palestine before the creation of Israel.

The documents that I have seen, and previously posted, say that it was a country.

You have not posted anything to refute that.

(OBSERVATION)

"Palestine is today a legal entity but it is not a sovereign state. Palestine is a territory administered under mandate by His Majesty (in respect of the United Kingdom), who is entirely responsible both for its internal administration and for its foreign affairs.

"After the 15th May, 1948, Palestine will continue to be a legal entity but it will still not be a sovereign state because it will not be immediately self-governing. The authority responsible for its administration will, however, have changed.

"After the 15th May, 1948, the United Nations Commission will be the Government of Palestine. It does not seem very material whether it is considered to be the de facto or the de jure Government. In any case, its title to be the Government of Palestine will rest on the resolution of the General Assembly.

"His Majesty's Government will recognize the United Nations Commission as the authority with which to make an agreement regarding the transfer of the assets of the Government of Palestine."

SOURCE: PAL/138 27 February 1948

(COMMENT)

Before there was an Israel, the Government of Palestine was the UK as Mandatory. After the establishment of the State of Israel, the Government of Palestine was the UNPC.

Try to keep on top of this. You get it wrong every time.

Most Respectfully,
R

OK, but even under an appointed administration, it was still the country of Palestine.

As for the UNPC, when did it ever step foot in Palestine and what did it do to protect its citizens under its watch?

The documents you have posted have been shown to not prove the existence of a Palestinian state before 1988. In matter of fact not one of the originals contain any reference to Palestine, and it is only the deviousness of the author you rely on that inserted the term Palestine. If there had been a nation of Palestine when your source says there was then Lebanon, Syria and trans Jordan could not have been brought into existence. That is the simple concept you cant or wont understand, that Palestine at the time of the treaties he uses was all of those nations and the small part left that is disputed today.

Whaqt did the Palestine nation do to protect ALL of its citizens on its watch. Because Jews and Christians are just as much valid Palestinians as muslims, and have as much right to free determination as the muslims. This is something you deny by never mentioning the fact that under Palestinian rule the Jews and Christians have suffered greatly and been ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homes.

 

[montelatici]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The Brits made this abundantly clear. PLEASE consider your statement refuted!


(OBSERVATION)


(COMMENT)

Before there was an Israel, the Government of Palestine was the UK as Mandatory. After the establishment of the State of Israel, the Government of Palestine was the UNPC.

Try to keep on top of this. You get it wrong every time.

Most Respectfully,
R

OK, but even under an appointed administration, it was still the country of Palestine.

As for the UNPC, when did it ever step foot in Palestine and what did it do to protect its citizens under its watch?

The documents you have posted have been shown to not prove the existence of a Palestinian state before 1988. In matter of fact not one of the originals contain any reference to Palestine, and it is only the deviousness of the author you rely on that inserted the term Palestine. If there had been a nation of Palestine when your source says there was then Lebanon, Syria and trans Jordan could not have been brought into existence. That is the simple concept you cant or wont understand, that Palestine at the time of the treaties he uses was all of those nations and the small part left that is disputed today.

Whaqt did the Palestine nation do to protect ALL of its citizens on its watch. Because Jews and Christians are just as much valid Palestinians as muslims, and have as much right to free determination as the muslims. This is something you deny by never mentioning the fact that under Palestinian rule the Jews and Christians have suffered greatly and been ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homes.

You are so full of crap. The Jews and the Muslims defended Jerusalem from Christian (Crusader) attacks. Muslims and Jews were allies against the Christian (European) invader. Read some history.

Today, Palestinian Christians are just as oppressed by Jews as Muslim Christians. To wit:

"Since the Israeli occupation began in 1967, Israel has confiscated thousands of acres belonging to Palestinian Christians and Muslims. In the Jerusalem and Bethlehem areas, Christians have been severely affected by Israel’s colonization policies. As an example, approximately 5,436 acres of land from northern Bethlehem were unilaterally annexed by Israel to create the illegal settlements of Gilo and Har Homa – which Israel now cynically calls new Jerusalem “neighborhoods.”

The plight of Palestinian Christians | JPost | Israel News

 

[RoccoR]

et al,

We've jumped around here a bit.

What is the argument now and what are the allegations?

v/r
R

 

[aris2chat]

Jews could not serve in the Islamic military.

 

[Sally]

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem consisted of Palestine and holdings in Syria and Lebanon. Palestine is referred to in histories of the Latin Kingdom, including the most respected written by LIEUT.-COL. C. R CONDER. The table of contents is below. Palestine existed within the Christian state and prior as a province within an Arab Caliphate. All these attempts to deligitimize the rights of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine are infantile.



THE



LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.



1099 TO 1291 A.D.



BY



LIEUT.-COL. C:*R:' CONDER, LL.D., M.R.A.S., R.E.,

Author of " Tent Work in Palestine" " Heth and Moab" etc.




PUBLISHED BY THE

COMMITTEE OF THE PALESTINE EXPLORATION FUND,
24, HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON.

1897.
[All rights reserved. ]




V



LONDON :

HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HER MAJESTY.
ST. MARTIN'S LANE.




CONTENTS.



PAGE

PREFACE v.

CHAP, I. PETER THE HERMIT . i

,, II. THE MARCH TO ANTIOCH ... 28

,, III. THE FOUNDING OF THE KINGDOM 55

,, IV. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM 75

,, V. THE Loss OF THE KINGDOM 119

,, VI. THE FRANK LIFE IN PALESTINE 161

VII. THE NATIVE LIFE IN PALESTINE 215

., VIII. THE THIRD CRUSADE 251

,, IX. THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANKS 294

,, X. ST. Louis ... ... ... ... ... ... 344

,, XL THE TARTARS 366

,, XII. THE Loss OF ACRE 386

CONCLUSION .. ... 414

INDEX 429



H 2



MAPS.



MAP OF WESTERN PALESTINE SHEWING THE LATIN
FIEFS .. -

Yes, I am aware of the Kingdom of Jerusalem which was created under the Christian Crusaders. It was called the Kingdom of Jerusalem, not Palestine. It was destroyed by the Muslims.

Let's face ot. a Muslim or Dhimmi like montelatici would never look for a book that tells about the Muslim conquest of the surrounding countries when they left the Saudi Arabian Peninsula. The people who were living their were among the early Christians and very, very devout. Perhaps montelatici doesn't care that millions of people were forced to convert to Islam and many who refused were murdered. As for the Palestinians, I think this is an interesting piece.

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2014/01/09/palestinians-invented-people/

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem consisted of Palestine and holdings in Syria and Lebanon. Palestine is referred to in histories of the Latin Kingdom, including the most respected written by LIEUT.-COL. C. R CONDER. The table of contents is below. Palestine existed within the Christian state and prior as a province within an Arab Caliphate. All these attempts to deligitimize the rights of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine are infantile.



THE



LATIN KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.



1099 TO 1291 A.D.



BY



LIEUT.-COL. C:*R:' CONDER, LL.D., M.R.A.S., R.E.,

Author of " Tent Work in Palestine" " Heth and Moab" etc.




PUBLISHED BY THE

COMMITTEE OF THE PALESTINE EXPLORATION FUND,
24, HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON.

1897.
[All rights reserved. ]




V



LONDON :

HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HER MAJESTY.
ST. MARTIN'S LANE.




CONTENTS.



PAGE

PREFACE v.

CHAP, I. PETER THE HERMIT . i

,, II. THE MARCH TO ANTIOCH ... 28

,, III. THE FOUNDING OF THE KINGDOM 55

,, IV. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM 75

,, V. THE Loss OF THE KINGDOM 119

,, VI. THE FRANK LIFE IN PALESTINE 161

VII. THE NATIVE LIFE IN PALESTINE 215

., VIII. THE THIRD CRUSADE 251

,, IX. THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANKS 294

,, X. ST. Louis ... ... ... ... ... ... 344

,, XL THE TARTARS 366

,, XII. THE Loss OF ACRE 386

CONCLUSION .. ... 414

INDEX 429



H 2



MAPS.



MAP OF WESTERN PALESTINE SHEWING THE LATIN
FIEFS .. -

Yes, I am aware of the Kingdom of Jerusalem which was created under the Christian Crusaders. It was called the Kingdom of Jerusalem, not Palestine. It was destroyed by the Muslims.

Let's face ot. a Muslim or Dhimmi like montelatici would never look for a book that tells about the Muslim conquest of the surrounding countries when they left the Saudi Arabian Peninsula. The people who were living their were among the early Christians and very, very devout. Perhaps montelatici doesn't care that millions of people were forced to convert to Islam and many who refused were murdered. As for the Palestinians, I think this is an interesting piece.

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2014/01/09/palestinians-invented-people/

The article you posted should be mandatory reading.

 

[RoccoR]

ForeverYoung436, et al,

Yes --- this was a hot topic then.

Yes, I am aware of the Kingdom of Jerusalem which was created under the Christian Crusaders. It was called the Kingdom of Jerusalem, not Palestine. It was destroyed by the Muslims.

Let's face ot. a Muslim or Dhimmi like montelatici would never look for a book that tells about the Muslim conquest of the surrounding countries when they left the Saudi Arabian Peninsula. The people who were living their were among the early Christians and very, very devout. Perhaps montelatici doesn't care that millions of people were forced to convert to Islam and many who refused were murdered. As for the Palestinians, I think this is an interesting piece.

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2014/01/09/palestinians-invented-people/

The article you posted should be mandatory reading.

(COMMENT)

A number of participants in the discussion made similar observations.

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE FIRST SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY (VOLUME III)

I was making a similar argument with PF Tinmore, relative to where "Palestinian" was included in "Greater Syria."

In 1947, it may have been relevant. But today, it has been overtaken by events.

I happen to agree, just as a matter of a point in history that:

"The representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said, “Palestine was part of the Province of Syria,” and that, “politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity.”"
SOURCE: Cherson and Molschky

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

OK, but even under an appointed administration, it was still the country of Palestine.

As for the UNPC, when did it ever step foot in Palestine and what did it do to protect its citizens under its watch?

The documents you have posted have been shown to not prove the existence of a Palestinian state before 1988. In matter of fact not one of the originals contain any reference to Palestine, and it is only the deviousness of the author you rely on that inserted the term Palestine. If there had been a nation of Palestine when your source says there was then Lebanon, Syria and trans Jordan could not have been brought into existence. That is the simple concept you cant or wont understand, that Palestine at the time of the treaties he uses was all of those nations and the small part left that is disputed today.

Whaqt did the Palestine nation do to protect ALL of its citizens on its watch. Because Jews and Christians are just as much valid Palestinians as muslims, and have as much right to free determination as the muslims. This is something you deny by never mentioning the fact that under Palestinian rule the Jews and Christians have suffered greatly and been ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homes.

You are so full of crap. The Jews and the Muslims defended Jerusalem from Christian (Crusader) attacks. Muslims and Jews were allies against the Christian (European) invader. Read some history.

Today, Palestinian Christians are just as oppressed by Jews as Muslim Christians. To wit:

"Since the Israeli occupation began in 1967, Israel has confiscated thousands of acres belonging to Palestinian Christians and Muslims. In the Jerusalem and Bethlehem areas, Christians have been severely affected by Israel’s colonization policies. As an example, approximately 5,436 acres of land from northern Bethlehem were unilaterally annexed by Israel to create the illegal settlements of Gilo and Har Homa – which Israel now cynically calls new Jerusalem “neighborhoods.”

The plight of Palestinian Christians | JPost | Israel News

Try coming more up to date if you can, and if you read the Oslo Accords you will see that the P.A signed away all that land so Israel has not confiscated anything .

"The Oslo II Accord (1995). Division of the West Bank into Areas, in effect fragmenting it into numerous enclaves and banning the Palestinians from some 60% of the West Bank. Redeployment of Israeli troops from Area A and from other areas through "Further Redeployments". Election of the Palestinian Legislative Council (Palestinian parlement, PLC), replacing the PA upon its inauguration. Deployment of Palestinian Police replacing Israeli military forces in Area A"


Now how do you like them apples, that destroy your argument in one fell swoop and shows your sources to be wrong and out of touch with the reality. Isn't it also very biased against any treaties made with the Palestinians representatives ?

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

We've jumped around here a bit.

What is the argument now and what are the allegations?

v/r
R

The Jews are stealing land.

The Jews are murdering Palestinians

The Jews are starving Palestinians

The Jews are Nazis

The Jews are the cause of all the problems


have I missed anything out ?

 

[Phoenall]

Jews could not serve in the Islamic military.

Correct as only muslims are allowed to bear arms.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Unfortunately, the UN didn't have your leadership and guidance to direct the UNPC> So they didn't try to meet your requirements, which differ from the "Steps Preparatory to Independence."

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes I have...


(OBSERVATION)



v/r
R

Where are the documents showing what they did to implement the resolution. Dr. Eduardo Morgan said that we are done, we are out of here. Where are the thing they were supposed to do like physically laying out the proposed borders and setting up the jurisdiction of Jerusalem, among others?

(COMMENT)

There were three separate aspects to the Partition Plan.

• Jewish State
• Arab State
• Jerusalem

The UNPC only had to implement the portion that was preparatory to the independence of the Jewish State. The original boundaries did not deviate from that of the Partition Plan. What changed the boundaries was the conflict that immediately ensued.

The UNPC had to meet UN criteria and not the PF Tinmore criteria. The declarations and clarifications on, amoung other things, the boundaries, were discussed by the UN in enclosure to Application of Israel for admission to membership in the United Nations (A/818). These were accepted by the UN General Assembly and culminated in "Admission of Israel to membership in the United Nations (A/RES/273)."

Most Respectfully,
R

Britain, as the mandate, refused to implement resolution 181 because it was not approved by both sides. The Security Council was faced with the prospect of having to implement it by force and it was not willing to do that. The US was proposing an alternate plan.

Then Israel unilaterally declared independence completely separate from the UN. There are some legal problems with this forced takeover of Palestinian land.

 

[toastman]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Unfortunately, the UN didn't have your leadership and guidance to direct the UNPC> So they didn't try to meet your requirements, which differ from the "Steps Preparatory to Independence."

Where are the documents showing what they did to implement the resolution. Dr. Eduardo Morgan said that we are done, we are out of here. Where are the thing they were supposed to do like physically laying out the proposed borders and setting up the jurisdiction of Jerusalem, among others?

(COMMENT)

There were three separate aspects to the Partition Plan.

• Jewish State
• Arab State
• Jerusalem

The UNPC only had to implement the portion that was preparatory to the independence of the Jewish State. The original boundaries did not deviate from that of the Partition Plan. What changed the boundaries was the conflict that immediately ensued.

The UNPC had to meet UN criteria and not the PF Tinmore criteria. The declarations and clarifications on, amoung other things, the boundaries, were discussed by the UN in enclosure to Application of Israel for admission to membership in the United Nations (A/818). These were accepted by the UN General Assembly and culminated in "Admission of Israel to membership in the United Nations (A/RES/273)."

Most Respectfully,
R

Britain, as the mandate, refused to implement resolution 181 because it was not approved by both sides. The Security Council was faced with the prospect of having to implement it by force and it was not willing to do that. The US was proposing an alternate plan.

Then Israel unilaterally declared independence completely separate from the UN. There are some legal problems with this forced takeover of Palestinian land.

Israel legally declared independence after cessation of the Mandate. I've showed you that link that says that many times from a credible source. There was nothing illegal about it. You say that Israel DI away from the U.N, but not only is that not true, but the U.N also recognized Israel's declaration
And, for the last time, Resolution 181 was the basis for Israel AND Palestine declaring independence, as the links I have posted several times say

 

[toastman]

Ob, and there was no takeover of Palestinian land. The Jews had their shit together, the Arabs didn't.

 

[Sallow]

Which only proves that he was Christian warped by his Jew hated even then. Tony Blair was a Protestant right up until he resigned as Prime Minister and then he became a catholic. When Hitler came to power he was already a Satanist, and empowered his followers to devise a new German religion based on Aryan principles but with some Christianity thrown in.


Want to try again using his speeches from 1936 to 1945

Really now?

So was Martin Luther a "Satanist" when he wrote this?

On the Jews and Their Lies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about King Charlamange when he forced conversions?
Charlemagne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And all the other folks..

Forced conversion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You folks have a long and bloody history.

What exactly are you trying to say?

What's not clear to you?

Christianity has a long and very bloody history.