A true view of what Republicans are.

Incorrect. There's plenty of 'truth' out there. What we lack as a nation right now is a consensus. Facts and statistics are meaningless without it. Social media is a absolute detriment to it.

I agree, truth is out there, but it’s not in any media outlet. Every one has an agenda.
 
Are any of those sources right wing sources? Or are they all left wing?

Let see, I was a door to door salesman from 1988 to 1998 and it was in Florida. As such, what are the chances that every door that I went to was leftist?
Really? Because there are a lot of websites out there that refute the accusations levied against Trump. That’s data. So what makes your data more right than theirs?

Something to do with the fact that accusations by people don't turn into grand jury actions, folllowed by actual court cases where peers decide whether you are guilty or not. Getting convicted of scamming people through an online university and having to pay $25 million dollars (and paying it), getting convicted of scamming people with a charity that was used by Trump himself (no charity received any funds) and being given a $2 million fine (and paying it), being accused of sexual misconduct and getting an $86 million judgement against you and appealing it and losing the appeal and as such, having to pay it, would suggest that my information about Trump is valid data, no?
Do you actually listen to objective arguments or do you dismiss, out of hand, any evidence to support trump? If you don’t, then it would be impossible to prove you wrong, not because you are right, but because you refuse to listen to any argument that doesn’t coincide with your own.

I absolutely listen to information given that has data, statistics, and facts attached to it. Unfortunately, no one defending Trump has yet give any data, statistics of facts that would support his view
Blind by choice is a purely subjective observation, depending on the sources you choose to listen to. If you dismiss any argument based on the source, someone else could do the same to you. There are those who think, based on the evidence they see, that lefty’s are blind by choice.

If I research and come up with data that refutes your, where does that leave us? Will you believe it?

Absolutely, as long as it is based on data, statistics, and facts. Opinion pieces do not enter into that category.
There is a source of information that contradicts every assertion you’ve made. Take your videos that you’ve posted. There are videos out there that would paint the left in the same light. Why didn’t you post those? Those are data as well, but you didn’t post them, so it would appear you went looking for a biased data set to make your post. Doing so skews your data and statistics. Doing research and letting the data lead you means you search for data from both sides of the argument.

Because my posts are about Trump (the person). I am not here to debate politics (though sometimes I can and do). I am here to show how bad Trump is COMPARED to anyone else. I consider Trump to be the lowest kind of a person there is, meaning that unless you can PROVE that someone running against him is WORSE, I will continue to key and talk about Trump.

Now that I have answered your questions, why have you NEVER admitted to anything that Trump has publicly and repeatedly done (and especially said himself) wrong?
 
Here is George Carlin on what Republicans are:



and here is George Carlin on Republicans



and here is George Carlin on Republican Pro-lifers



and last but not least, a correct view on Politicians (on both sides)



George Carlin was a great comic but he was great because he had a way of bringing reality to you in a way you could relate to it. Laughing is makes people PAY ATTENTION to what faces us

Carlin is room temperature. Those are old routines from his nasty leftist later years.
 
Carlin is room temperature. Those are old routines from his nasty leftist later years.
Yeah but the history of people (and how they do things) goes back centuries, meaning that Carlin's routines are actually recent and clearly shows how Republicans do things as always
 
Yeah but the history of people (and how they do things) goes back centuries, meaning that Carlin's routines are actually recent and clearly shows how Republicans do things as always
Carlin despised limousine liberals every bit as much as he despised corrupt repubs.

Your problem is you ARE a fascist, so any crimes the demofascists commit you don't care about.
 
Here is George Carlin on what Republicans are:



and here is George Carlin on Republicans



and here is George Carlin on Republican Pro-lifers



and last but not least, a correct view on Politicians (on both sides)



George Carlin was a great comic but he was great because he had a way of bringing reality to you in a way you could relate to it. Laughing is makes people PAY ATTENTION to what faces us


Maybe if you convince a few more women to sacrifice their offspring, you’d feel better about having no honor.

Worth a shot?
 
Here is George Carlin on what Republicans are:



and here is George Carlin on Republicans



and here is George Carlin on Republican Pro-lifers



and last but not least, a correct view on Politicians (on both sides)



George Carlin was a great comic but he was great because he had a way of bringing reality to you in a way you could relate to it. Laughing is makes people PAY ATTENTION to what faces us

Now the roles have been reversed. Those videos are from a long time ago when Democrats were much different. Now Democrats are pro war and anti middle class


Carlin would be in shock of the cancel culture and wokeism of the Democrat party today
 
Now the roles have been reversed. Those videos are from a long time ago when Democrats were much different. Now Democrats are pro war and anti middle class


Carlin would be in shock of the cancel culture and wokeism of the Democrat party today
Nah, he was very well read. Shocked he would not be. Saddened he would.
 
You stupid ass, the billionaire oligarchs OWN the demofascists.

Sheesh, you are truly dumb.
Well to be honest they own both parties. But the BILLIONAIRE OLIGARCH is the leader of your party isn't he?

J.D. Vance’s comments about Taylor Swift backfire in the most hilarious way possible​


“but I don’t think most Americans, whether they like her music, are fans of hers or not, are going to be influenced by a billionaire celebrity who I think is fundamentally disconnected from the interests and the problems of most Americans.”

Many were quick to point out that Vance’s remarks are tone-deaf and could have easily been about former President Donald Trump, who has built his entire public image on being a “billionaire celebrity.”

And has broken the laws constantly along the way.
 
Now the roles have been reversed. Those videos are from a long time ago when Democrats were much different. Now Democrats are pro war and anti middle class


Carlin would be in shock of the cancel culture and wokeism of the Democrat party today
No, they are not
 
Maybe if you convince a few more women to sacrifice their offspring, you’d feel better about having no honor.

Worth a shot?
Your post is hilariously uninformed. I am a people person and the 4 things that drive me and that I am, is moral,, ethical, principled and humane and I run my life with those every day of my life.
 
Your post is hilariously uninformed. I am a people person and the 4 things that drive me and that I am, is moral,, ethical, principled and humane and I run my life with those every day of my life.
Except for the unborn, then you’re ok with killing em.

A life with no honor is a wasted life b
 
Well to be honest they own both parties. But the BILLIONAIRE OLIGARCH is the leader of your party isn't he?

J.D. Vance’s comments about Taylor Swift backfire in the most hilarious way possible​


“but I don’t think most Americans, whether they like her music, are fans of hers or not, are going to be influenced by a billionaire celebrity who I think is fundamentally disconnected from the interests and the problems of most Americans.”

Many were quick to point out that Vance’s remarks are tone-deaf and could have easily been about former President Donald Trump, who has built his entire public image on being a “billionaire celebrity.”

And has broken the laws constantly along the way.
Nope. Based on the simple fact that the oligarchs are trying to kill him it is obvious to everyone, but a fool, that Trump isn't political class.
But you keep being stupid.
 
Except for the unborn, then you’re ok with killing em.

A life with no honor is a wasted life b
It is a difference of opinion as to what a fetus is and I am not the only one that thinks that way. Biologists and scientists disagree on the definition of life. Even the Supreme Court has no established definition and shifts the decision to the States themselves. Even the Republican States themselves disagree on the definition as some do not allow abortions after 6 weeks and others have different time frames.

As such, it is not my lack of morals, ethics, principles or humanity that is in play, it is my definition of life that is in play and I do not consider a fetus a human life. Simple as that.
 
Let see, I was a door to door salesman from 1988 to 1998 and it was in Florida. As such, what are the chances that every door that I went to was leftist?


Something to do with the fact that accusations by people don't turn into grand jury actions, folllowed by actual court cases where peers decide whether you are guilty or not. Getting convicted of scamming people through an online university and having to pay $25 million dollars (and paying it), getting convicted of scamming people with a charity that was used by Trump himself (no charity received any funds) and being given a $2 million fine (and paying it), being accused of sexual misconduct and getting an $86 million judgement against you and appealing it and losing the appeal and as such, having to pay it, would suggest that my information about Trump is valid data, no?


I absolutely listen to information given that has data, statistics, and facts attached to it. Unfortunately, no one defending Trump has yet give any data, statistics of facts that would support his view


Absolutely, as long as it is based on data, statistics, and facts. Opinion pieces do not enter into that category.


Because my posts are about Trump (the person). I am not here to debate politics (though sometimes I can and do). I am here to show how bad Trump is COMPARED to anyone else. I consider Trump to be the lowest kind of a person there is, meaning that unless you can PROVE that someone running against him is WORSE, I will continue to key and talk about Trump.

Now that I have answered your questions, why have you NEVER admitted to anything that Trump has publicly and repeatedly done (and especially said himself) wrong?

Let see, I was a door to door salesman from 1988 to 1998 and it was in Florida. As such, what are the chances that every door that I went to was leftist?

So, door to door customers are your only source of data?

Something to do with the fact that accusations by people don't turn into grand jury actions, folllowed by actual court cases where peers decide whether you are guilty or not

And you don’t believe that any of that is based on weaponization of the justice system? Remember, they were vowing to go after trump from the moment he announced his campaign. They were talking impeachment even before he was elected.

How does that figure into your data?

Sure trump has done some bad things, but some of it was weaponization, such as:

being accused of sexual misconduct and getting an $86 million judgement against you

Carroll could provide no evidence (data) to back up her claim, she couldn’t remember what year it happened. That conviction was based on “feelings”. Preponderance of evidence means “do you think it’s possible he could have done it”. That’s not an admission of guilt, nor is it proof that he actually did anything.

Your research would have shown you that and you should realize that it was a bogus judgment.

What about Harris and her incarcerating people for minor drug offenses, and then keeping them in prison for longer than their sentence in order to get free labor for the city? That’s something you could have researched and reported on. Remember, data has no bias.

I absolutely listen to information given that has data, statistics, and facts attached to it. Unfortunately, no one defending Trump has yet give any data, statistics of facts that would support his view

Really? You’ve been a member of this forum for just over 3 weeks, you’ve, no doubt, seen plenty of articles providing data and stats supporting trumps view.

Absolutely, as long as it is based on data, statistics, and facts. Opinion pieces do not enter into that category.

So if someone links a story from Fox, newsmax, the blaze, or town hall, you’ll believe them?

Because my posts are about Trump (the person). I am not here to debate politics (though sometimes I can and do). I am here to show how bad Trump is COMPARED to anyone else. I consider Trump to be the lowest kind of a person there is, meaning that unless you can PROVE that someone running against him is WORSE, I will continue to key and talk about Trump.

Great, so you’re biased, which, there’s nothing wrong with that, but it is the antitheses of data and fact driven research. What good is data if you use all the findings that support your claim but discard all the data that refuted your claim?

I’m not faulting you for being biased, I’m just saying that, in your quest to research and use facts, in order to better yourself, you need to embrace all of the data, not just that which fits your agenda. To do that makes you the same as most others in this forum.

Now that I have answered your questions, why have you NEVER admitted to anything that Trump has publicly and repeatedly done (and especially said himself) wrong?

If you’ve researched any of my posts, you’ll find that I’m not a fan of Trump, and not defending him. I only push back on the games that the left are playing. I’ve stated that I would have rather someone else won in 2016.

Having said that, I have no problem admitting to trumps flaws, since I really don’t support “a person” but rather the party and the ideology.

I’ll only vote for Trump this time around because I’d rather have a Republican in office than a democrat.

Trump has been accused of doing some bad things. I’ll admit, I don’t know much about the details of his university scam, so i won’t argue that, I’ll take your word for it. The issues I have is that trump has been under the attack of leftists ever since he announced his presidency for 9 years now, they are acting on their intentions of 2016, where they vowed to impeach trump even before he was elected, then they started to use the courts to go after him. Letitia James even campaigned on going after Trump and this was before any of the information about his finances came out. Her election platform was based on lawfare. Alvin Bragg brought a case against him that even his own party was questioning as a legitimate case. Then he hands down an indictment that ran afoul of the rules and procedures for indicting someone.

Your data should have shown you these things. These are the games that lefty’s are playing that push back against. I don’t care what person occupies the White House, but I prefer them to be a Republican.
 
Meh, Democrats have become TRAITORS who belong in prison.

To THINK THAT if Any one CHOICE to prefer a Different political party than the one YOU support
you think they should be in JAIL. Then YOU are the one who is very UN AMERICAN.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom