A true view of what Republicans are.

[Luckyone]

Is that what this is all about for you? Curious…

She lied in the debate .. multiple times. Sorry .. you're just wrong, and it goes against your point you made earlier. She's catering to appear more moderate while being the most liberal and extreme politician -- even to the left of Bernie Sanders, who continues to provide insights on this front.

Why don't you EVER give any proof to your words. You should know by now that with me, words are useless without supporting evidence of them. Do you like to waste your time and effort. You are not going to convince me (or anyone) that what you are saying, if you do not give supporting data, statistics and facts.

Fact checkers checked everything that was said at the debate and they determined that Trump lied 30 times and that Kamala lied once. You say she lied multiple times. Prove it

 

[jotathought]

Why don't you EVER give any proof to your words. You should know by now that with me, words are useless without supporting evidence of them. Do you like to waste your time and effort. You are not going to convince me (or anyone) that what you are saying, if you do not give supporting data, statistics and facts.

Fact checkers checked everything that was said at the debate and they determined that Trump lied 30 times and that Kamala lied once. You say she lied multiple times. Prove it

Your data has been proven to be 10+ years old with politicians that are no longer in office. Just a couple of lies Kamala told was using her well-memorized points on Trump saying, and not providing the full context, of a 'bloodbath' and 'very fine people.' In addition, she didn't answer the questions, and even CNN is questioning this. Not to mention the 3-1 debate between Harris and the two moderators.

 

[Luckyone]

Is that what this is all about for you? Curious…

With fools that have proven to be unable to see facts, data, and statistics but that have not personally insulted or debased me (in other words have not done anything for me to put them on ignore), is do like to get under their skin. It seems that is the only way to get them to expose publicly who they are.

 

[whitehall]

Carlin was a one joke standup comedian. Hatred for republicans doesn't translate to unbiased political discourse but it's all the left has these days.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Why don't you EVER give any proof to your words. You should know by now that with me, words are useless without supporting evidence of them. Do you like to waste your time and effort. You are not going to convince me (or anyone) that what you are saying, if you do not give supporting data, statistics and facts.

Fact checkers checked everything that was said at the debate and they determined that Trump lied 30 times and that Kamala lied once. You say she lied multiple times. Prove it

?? You quote me then don’t address my quote. All I asked is, is getting under people’s skin your goal here?

Also:

You are not going to convince me (or anyone) that what you are saying, if you do not give supporting data, statistics and facts.

Nobody is going to convince you of anything, no matter what. Even if evidence is provided, you’ll deny it, call it fake news, or provide some left wing site to debunk it. The only way to debunk a left wing talking point is with a right wing talking point, and vice versa, and when that happens, it’s called “fake news”.

It’s the eternal mystery of message boards like this. Nobody is ever going to convince anyone of anything. We’re all here, pretty much…to argue…that’s about it.

 

[Auld Phart]

The wanker don't do "facts"

only those that come with a laff track

 

[Luckyone]

Your data has been proven to be 10+ years old with politicians that are no longer in office. Just a couple of lies Kamala told was using her well-memorized points on Trump saying, and not providing the full context, of a 'bloodbath' and 'very fine people.' In addition, she didn't answer the questions, and even CNN is questioning this. Not to mention the 3-1 debate between Harris and the two moderators.

She answered the question more than Trump answered the questions. Nonetheless, the debate itself was more about exposing the other person than about answering questions. As I have stated repeatedly, this election is not so much about the issues but about survival and every time that Trump is in one of these debates, he shows he is a deadly cancer, meaning that all Kamala had to do was show that she wasn't a cancer. She did that very successfully last night.

as far as the moderators. All they did is ask the questions that have been asked in every other debate since debate started. Those questions were not biased in any way to help or hurt either candidate. As far as the few corrections to statements that were made, once again, the fact checked reality is that Trump lied 30 times and Kamala lied once and Trumps lies were also ridiculous, such as crowds of dog eating Haitians being statements that Trump made that were absolutely ridiculous.

 

[jotathought]

She answered the question more than Trump answered the questions. Nonetheless, the debate itself was more about exposing the other person than about answering questions. As I have stated repeatedly, this election is not so much about the issues but about survival and every time that Trump is in one of these debates, he shows he is a deadly cancer, meaning that all Kamala had to do was show that she wasn't a cancer. She did that very successfully last night.

as far as the moderators. All they did is ask the questions that have been asked in every other debate since debate started. Those questions were not biased in any way to help or hurt either candidate. As far as the few corrections to statements that were made, once again, the fact checked reality is that Trump lied 30 times and Kamala lied once and Trumps lies were also ridiculous, such as crowds of dog eating Haitians being statements that Trump made that were absolutely ridiculous.

She didn't answer questions .. period, and wasn't challenged or real-time 'fact-checked' by moderators.

 

[ThisIsMe]

With fools that have proven to be unable to see facts, data, and statistics but that have not personally insulted or debased me (in other words have not done anything for me to put them on ignore), is do like to get under their skin. It seems that is the only way to get them to expose publicly who they are.

But, the facts and statistics are YOUR facts and statistics. If someone provides facts and statistics to debunk you, but they are from a source you don’t like, you won’t find them credible.

So, the only way to debunk a left wing “fact” would be to find another left wing source…and that isn’t happening.

For as long as this board has been around, we’ve been arguing about news, and each side thinks the other sides sources are lying, or fake.

the truth is, on the world of media, there is no truth..it’s all biased.

 

[Luckyone]

?? You quote me then don’t address my quote. All I asked is, is getting under people’s skin your goal here?

Also:



Nobody is going to convince you of anything, no matter what. Even if evidence is provided, you’ll deny it, call it fake news, or provide some left wing site to debunk it. The only way to debunk a left wing talking point is with a right wing talking point, and vice versa, and when that happens, it’s called “fake news”.

It’s the eternal mystery of message boards like this. Nobody is ever going to convince anyone of anything. We’re all here, pretty much…to argue…that’s about it.

Wow, I have answered both questions on numerous occasions but you seem to be ignoring them. I will make them as clear as I can here so that perhaps they will enter your brain.

No, my purpose in being here is not to get under people's skin. I am here as a messenger of data, statistics, and facts that is evaluated, researched, and made clear that they are in effect data, statistics, and facts, that people that have such guidelines will vote accordingly. By the same token, this message board has shown itself to be full of Trump cult members that are not interested in debating and gaining knowledge, they are here to orate their views. I do not accept insults or debasement of anyone and for that reason only, I have put 20 members here on ignore (not even tried to get under their skin). With the others that are Trump cult members but have not insulted or debased me, but have proven to be blind-by-choice, the choice I have is to ignore them or make fun of them (get under their skin) so that the time I waste in talking to them, brings me at least some distraction and pleasure.

As far as your second question is that I have learned in life that even if something is about as close to impossible to achieve, (99% probability of failing), if you do not even try, then it is a 100% probability and in my entire life, I have always tried to achieve goals no matter how difficult they may be. One goal that I always wanted was to find true love. When I divorced my first wife at age 54(where no true love existed), I thought I would never find true love in my life but I did not stop trying even though I sincerely thought it was ALL OVER. Lo and behold, 3 years later I found true love and the meeting where I found that person, was a miracle because neither one of us was going to attend the function where we met and in both cases (hers and mine), we were literally dragged friends to go there. In other words, 99% probability of it not happening.............but it did.

As such, that is the reason I keep trying.

I sincerely hope these explanations enter your mind because I will not try again with you to explain this.

 

[sealybobo]

All I know is libs stole 250 million dollars earmarked for feeding the chirren during COVID

Did we? You mean like Republicans and Brett Favre stole welfare money from poor people in

Mississippi State Auditor Shad White filed a countersuit against ex-NFL quarterback Brett Favre on Monday, alleging Favre owes nearly $729,000 in interest connected to over $1 million in state welfare funds given to Favre for speaking services he didn’t complete—part of a massive scandal alleging Favre and Republicans misused welfare money on personal projects.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Well, reality throughout history has shown us that people rarely change. There have always been more assholes than intelligent people throughout history. So showing snippets that are 10 years old does not make one shred of difference because the Republicans were selfish people then and remain selfish people now.

There are more unintelligent assholes out there because a lot of the intelligent ones ARE assholes. How do you expect that to work out?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Wow, I have answered both questions on numerous occasions but you seem to be ignoring them. I will make them as clear as I can here so that perhaps they will enter your brain.

No, my purpose in being here is not to get under people's skin. I am here as a messenger of data, statistics, and facts that is evaluated, researched, and made clear that they are in effect data, statistics, and facts, that people that have such guidelines will vote accordingly. By the same token, this message board has shown itself to be full of Trump cult members that are not interested in debating and gaining knowledge, they are here to orate their views. I do not accept insults or debasement of anyone and for that reason only, I have put 20 members here on ignore (not even tried to get under their skin). With the others that are Trump cult members but have not insulted or debased me, but have proven to be blind-by-choice, the choice I have is to ignore them or make fun of them (get under their skin) so that the time I waste in talking to them, brings me at least some distraction and pleasure.

As far as your second question is that I have learned in life that even if something is about as close to impossible to achieve, (99% probability of failing), if you do not even try, then it is a 100% probability and in my entire life, I have always tried to achieve goals no matter how difficult they may be. One goal that I always wanted was to find true love. When I divorced my first wife at age 54(where no true love existed), I thought I would never find true love in my life but I did not stop trying even though I sincerely thought it was ALL OVER. Lo and behold, 3 years later I found true love and the meeting where I found that person, was a miracle because neither one of us was going to attend the function where we met and in both cases (hers and mine), we were literally dragged friends to go there. In other words, 99% probability of it not happening.............but it did.

As such, that is the reason I keep trying.

I sincerely hope these explanations enter your mind because I will not try again with you to explain this.

Ok, thanks. This post says a lot, a lot more than you might think.

I am here as a messenger of data, statistics, and facts that is evaluated, researched, and made clear that they are in effect data, statistics, and facts, that people that have such guidelines will vote accordingly

How can you be sure your data is accurate? Where do you source your information? Where do THEY derive their data? Is it from typically left leaning sources? If so, then your data is as flawed as any other.

By the same token, this message board has shown itself to be full of Trump cult members that are not interested in debating and gaining knowledge, they are here to orate their views

You say you are interested in data, facts, and analysis, but then you make comments like this, which make you appear to be one sided. Someone driven by data would have to be neutral, letting the data lead them where it goes, whether it be for one side or the other. This comment of yours gives you the appearance of being biased, which is the exact opposite of a data driven result.

You say trump members are not interested in gaining knowledge. This would indicate that your knowledge is the only knowledge that is correct, and that your research has led you to the result that trump is all negative and Harris is all positive. This isn’t the case. Both sides have their goods and bads.

With the others that are Trump cult members

Again, evidence of bias, which is not reflective of a data/fact driven person.

With the others that are Trump cult members but have not insulted or debased me, but have proven to be blind-by-choice, the choice I have is to ignore them or make fun of them (get under their skin) so that the time I waste in talking to them, brings me at least some distraction and pleasure.

So, the “blind by choice”, or, those who you feel don’t agree with your data, data which, if sourced by left leaning places, is flawed as any other, are those whom you derive pleasure from needling to get under their skin.

Well, that’s a rather juvenile approach to debate and argument, that’s fine if that’s how you want to do things, but I’ll tell you that it’s going to be a huge impediment to trying to impart knowledge to anyone, especially here, in these forums.

 

[mudwhistle]

Here is George Carlin on what Republicans are:



and here is George Carlin on Republicans



and here is George Carlin on Republican Pro-lifers



and last but not least, a correct view on Politicians (on both sides)



George Carlin was a great comic but he was great because he had a way of bringing reality to you in a way you could relate to it. Laughing is makes people PAY ATTENTION to what faces us

 

[mudwhistle]

This reminds me of when Republicans say "I can't believe you get your opinions from The Daily Show or Jimmy Kimmel. Or George Carlin.

I sure do. Actually I don't get my opinions from them. They confirm to me that I'm not alone in my opinions.

You know the difference between a fairy tale and a sea story?

One begins with "Once upon a time...." and the other begins with "Now this ain't no bull shit....".

Both are pretty much made up stories.

Same goes with standup comedy.

Standup isn't meant to be accurate or the truth.....however the best jokes have a tiny bit of truth in them.

 

[Luckyone]

Ok, thanks. This post says a lot, a lot more than you might think.



How can you be sure your data is accurate? Where do you source your information? Where do THEY derive their data? Is it from typically left leaning sources? If so, then your data is as flawed as any other.

Good question. I do as much research as I can and I use as many sources as I can find. In addition, I have had thousands of contacts and conversations with people throughout my life (I was a very successful salesman and personally met and talked to a lot of people and I did communicate with them as I do generally care about people so I converse with people a lot) and as such, I am a good evaluator of people in general.. This does not mean that I am right all the time given that such a thing does not exist (anyone being right 100%) but I have a good probability of being right. Nonetheless that is what debates are for, have the other person PROVE you wrong.

You say you are interested in data, facts, and analysis, but then you make comments like this, which make you appear to be one sided. Someone driven by data would have to be neutral, letting the data lead them where it goes, whether it be for one side or the other. This comment of yours gives you the appearance of being biased, which is the exact opposite of a data driven result.

I am one sided on THIS issue because Trump has proven 100% who he is. There is absolutely NO DOUBT. During the 7 years I have been on Political boards, no one has EVER been able to prove me wrong on Trump.


View attachment 1010684

You say trump members are not interested in gaining knowledge. This would indicate that your knowledge is the only knowledge that is correct, and that your research has led you to the result that trump is all negative and Harris is all positive. This isn’t the case. Both sides have their goods and bads.

In general (not 100% but most) are blind-by-choice to data, statistics and facts. A large portion are truly cult members.

Again, evidence of bias, which is not reflective of a data/fact driven person.



So, the “blind by choice”, or, those who you feel don’t agree with your data, data which, if sourced by left leaning places, is flawed as any other, are those whom you derive pleasure from needling to get under their skin.

This is not about "feeling" anything. I deal with data, statistics and facts and that is what I provide. If someone provides data, statistics and facts that disprove mine, I will accept that.

Well, that’s a rather juvenile approach to debate and argument, that’s fine if that’s how you want to do things, but I’ll tell you that it’s going to be a huge impediment to trying to impart knowledge to anyone, especially here, in these forums.

All I am doing is being a messenger. I am not here to change anyone's mind. I learned the hard way some 28 years ago (with my ex-wife) that trying to change someone's mind does not work.

I do this for the principles that I run my life on and that principle is "always do the right thing, no matter the results" The results are not what counts (given that they don't depend on me), it is the journey/path to becoming a better person, that counts.

It is that simple.

 

[0311]

That describes you leftists even better.

He fucking described MAGA MAGGOTS to a mother fucking T

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Meh, Democrats have become TRAITORS who belong in prison.

You're not going to be able to handle what happens in November.

You might as well leave the country.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

still getting your news from comedians I see,,

So do you -- Trump

 

[westwall]

You're not going to be able to handle what happens in November.

You might as well leave the country.

Nah, it's going to be fun watching you melt down.