Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The autopsies have long been done as have the ballistic tests. How come we have never seen those ballistic tests. Was there another shooter that shot Rosenbaum on the back? Not that it matters much because the pelvis shot would have killed him. It does not make sense that Rosembaum spun, as he was shot in the knee as he was running forward and would not have been able to turn. Was there another shooter? Where are the ballistics tests confirming RIttenhouse was the only one?Kyle was never running AFTER anyone. He was at all times running away. That's how he hit Rosenbaum in the pelvis and knee.At the gas station it appears kyle ran after a guy and killed him in pure blood murder
I am waiting for the autopsy on the first felon...........wouldn't it be interesting if the bullet that killed him, was a pistol round? We will see....
Its only vigilantism if he chases down a rioter and executes him. That isnt what happened though. Kyle tried to run away before each shooting. That is self defense, not vigilantism.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Protecting property DURING a riot is not vigilantisim. That's what the Korean shop owners did during the riots in Los Angeles and NO ONE suggested they were vigilantes.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Would it matter? Is it a crime for me to stop someone from breaking into a car that i dont own?Protecting property DURING a riot is not vigilantisim. That's what the Korean shop owners did during the riots in Los Angeles and NO ONE suggested they were vigilantes.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Was he protecting his private property like the Korean shop owners were?
Its only vigilantism if he chases down a rioter and executes him. That isnt what happened though. Kyle tried to run away before each shooting. That is self defense, not vigilantism.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Would it matter? Is it a crime for me to stop someone from breaking into a car that i dont own?Protecting property DURING a riot is not vigilantisim. That's what the Korean shop owners did during the riots in Los Angeles and NO ONE suggested they were vigilantes.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Was he protecting his private property like the Korean shop owners were?
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
a business owner can ask any person to do anything he wants as long as its not illegal,,THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
His reason for being there is irrelevant. All that matters is the shooting and the specifics of what led up to it.Its only vigilantism if he chases down a rioter and executes him. That isnt what happened though. Kyle tried to run away before each shooting. That is self defense, not vigilantism.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Vigilantism is an unauthorized replacement of law enforcement. It doesnt have to end in an execution. He went there to do the job of law enforcement, armed, and put himself in the middle of violence. Both sides could make the argument of self defense when both sides are basically breaking the law.
No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
a business owner can ask any person to do anything he wants as long as its not illegal,,THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
this is america not china,,
Its my understanding that him having the gun is a only a misdemeanor.Would it matter? Is it a crime for me to stop someone from breaking into a car that i dont own?Protecting property DURING a riot is not vigilantisim. That's what the Korean shop owners did during the riots in Los Angeles and NO ONE suggested they were vigilantes.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Was he protecting his private property like the Korean shop owners were?
If you end up killing the person it probably would be. If you are not legally able to carry the gun that you are using while taking it upon yourself to go around protecting cars then you are also committing a crime.
No one has to be hired. Just asked. I've been in several riots. There are not well organized.No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
No-one was hired either. I have not been in a riot, I don't plan on going to find one so that I can participate in the violence either.
they dont need to be hired in a free country,, in fact they dont need the owners permission to defend his business if its getting destroyed,,No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.He should have stayed home.
So should the antifa/blm joe biden voters who were burning, looting, beating and attacking people.........had they not been there they wouldn't have been shot.
It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?
A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.
No-one was hired either. I have not been in a riot, I don't plan on going to find one so that I can participate in the violence either.
