- Dec 11, 2018
- Reaction score
funny thing to focus on when its pretty clear he was defending himself and not the attacker,,,Ugh, no, but you are defending him based on emotion. I'm just pointing out the problems he is going to have.are you his lawyer???In a court room his credibility could be called into question and a good lawyer will now try and show that he was there to commit violence.then why are you talking about non issues pertaining to the shootings???I'm not invested in this crime/incident either, but I just think it's worth knowing real truths about what happened and not just the emotional and political divide around it. I feel bad for him since he probably has ruined his life over this.so,, I wouldnt waste time worrying about it cause its a nothing burger either way,,I'm just telling you what he claimed. He claimed he was hired as security which is why he said he was there except the business owner already said that he wasn't hired to be security or asked to help. So he lied. He traveled with a gun that he shouldn't have had to a state he doesnt live in to do a job that he wasn't hired to do and ended up being in the middle of chaos and killed two people.they dont need to be hired in a free country,, in fact they dont need the owners permission to defend his business if its getting destroyed,,No-one was hired either. I have not been in a riot, I don't plan on going to find one so that I can participate in the violence either.No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
whether he was asked or not is irrelevant,,