- Dec 11, 2018
- Reaction score
he didnt stumble into violence,,, he was attacked by rioters,,,And made sure to arm up when he went to defend the business he wasn't asked to defend? So he clearly didn't stumble his way innocently into the violence. He was ready for it. He went looking for it?so now youre a mind reader,,,He probably wouldn't have even been there without the gun.let them,,, the facts about the attack are he was attacked and defended himself,,That he went looking for since he wasn't really there at a business owners request. Lawyers will play these games.to defend himself against violent attackers,,,And he brought a rifle with him and used ithe worked in the town,,, and was there all day cleaning up,,He didn't work there. He claimed he was hired to be security which the owner has denied. He doesnt even live in that state.thats not the reason why he traveled there,,,It does matter since that's what he told police and that was his reason for supposedly traveling there.I dont think that matters.He wasn't asked by the business owner either.No one has to be hired. Just asked. I've been in several riots. There are not well organized.No-one was hired either. I have not been in a riot, I don't plan on going to find one so that I can participate in the violence either.No one was deputized. There was no militia group. Have you ever been in a riot?A business owner can't effectively deputize a minor to defend his property with lethal force, plus the business owner (Car Source) has already said that they did not hire security. He simply just joined up with a militia group to take it upon themselves to defend businesses, vigilantism.THe ow
The owner of the business asked him to go and look after it. He did have a first aid kit. That's why he was wearing gloves.Stand guard over a business that wasn't his. Why that business? Render first aid? Why carry a rifle and not a medical kit? Was he there to fight or to render aid?Vigilantism usually is a crime though. He and others went there to provide justice and protection without legal authorization and ultimately killed people by putting himself in a position where violence between him and others were inevitable.That doesnt make it wrong or even a crime.It was not his responsibility to go there to provide justice.
Wrong.......he went there to stand guard over a business....and to render first aid. They attacked him...what about that isn't sinking in?
They chased him down, in all 3 shootings....what part of that is still not getting into your brain?
he worked there and was there helping clean up the mess left by the rioters,,,
if he didnt have the gun he would be dead or severely beaten,,
he was there all day without a gun,,,