jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
A simple qst. for R-W'ers defending Trump on the NO tapes admission
--LOL
--LOL
A simple qst. for R-W'ers defending Trump on the NO tapes admission
- Thread starter nat4900
- Start date
radical right
Platinum Member
- Feb 26, 2017
- 31,750
- 3,768
- 430
- Banned
- #322
Speaking of propaganda, we now know that Trump was given classified briefings starting in late august, and the full presidential daily brief after the election. So Trump was told about the russian interference months before getting into office, and all during that time Trump insisted the russian thing was "fake news", and the intelligence agencies, all 17 of them, weren't worth listening to.that all they brought him was "fake news"
We now know Vladimir Putin personally ordered the russian interference, and Trump knew it, yet said the russians weren't involved, didn't try to hack the election, and weren't colluding with any of his associates.
Yes, Trump put the screws to our NATO "allies" because THEY were not living up to their end of the bargain when it came to defense expenditures, RR! He did something other US President's have not had the spine to do...to call our "allies" out on their failed promises! That's not a bad thing and long overdue!
As for Trump not telling our enemies where our military is? Are you really that stupid that you don't realize it's a good thing to deceive your enemies?
radical right
Platinum Member
- Feb 26, 2017
- 31,750
- 3,768
- 430
- Banned
- #324
Trump leaked where half our tactical LA class submarines were. Telling a visiting leader we had them parked off the coast of N. Korea. Which also told N. Korea where they were.
Since there is no practical way to find the LA class, that gave N. Korea invaluable intel.
Wrong again idiot. Trump has never been under investigation, nor would he be for hinting at recording anything. He just did it to make a Comey shit his pants and tell the truth.
TheDude
Gold Member
I responded on another thread about the issue, and I am honestly asking this question of those FEW right wingers still capable of thinking on their own.....Likely you're seeking those who think like you.
What would you (right wingers) be saying today had COMEY stated, "....Trump better hope that the there are no tapes of our conversation....."??? I'd say he sounds like Trump. However, with their different positions, I'd be more concerned with Comey considering his former position in law enforcement.
Would you, today, be "excusing" Comey for the implication asserted in the above statement? I'd give it little consideration. At the end of the day it's what you have, not what you don't. At this point libs like yourself have nothing but a fabrication and hope.
What would you (right wingers) be saying today had COMEY stated, "....Trump better hope that the there are no tapes of our conversation....."??? I'd say he sounds like Trump. However, with their different positions, I'd be more concerned with Comey considering his former position in law enforcement.
Would you, today, be "excusing" Comey for the implication asserted in the above statement? I'd give it little consideration. At the end of the day it's what you have, not what you don't. At this point libs like yourself have nothing but a fabrication and hope.
Trump was not being investigated in Comey's "Russia" investigation. All of your links refer to Mueller's "investigation" after Comey was shit-canned, none of which give any specifics. His "investigation" is nothing but a which hunt which hasn't come up with anything.
And you know that Trump did that how?
Boss
Take a Memo:
I'm not going to bother reading 7 pages of this mental masturbation, I plan to unsubscribe to this thread after I post, but I wanted to respond to the OP...
No excuse is required, Trump did nothing wrong. It doesn't matter if it were the other way around because it wasn't the other way around. Trump made a tactical move that you're not getting here. Trump forced Comey to publicly admit the truth about telling him repeatedly he wasn't being investigated. Comey couldn't risk lying or being deceptive with the possibility of a tape being out there. So instead of having Comey sit there and play dumb and pretend he didn't recall telling Trump he wasn't being investigated, he had to admit the truth. Instead of having the media run around speculating a few more weeks about the possibility Trump was being investigated or that Trump was lying, they had to report the truth.
You've been Trumped!
AsianTrumpSupporter
Platinum Member
I wouldn't care, because the left is still the party of racist affirmative action and favoring some minorities over everyone else.
Doc1
Gold Member
So everyone tells the truth when they are under oath kid? Just answer the question or go back to the shallow end of the pool. You'll be safe there.
Doc1
Gold Member
Meaning of course you ASSUME Comey told the truth because you are blinded by you childish hatred, got it.
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,432
- 2,180
No, we don't know that, moron. That's purely an unsubstantiated claim by the Washington Post.
Doc1
Gold Member
Doc1
Gold Member
Flaming/Trolling, no content. Huh, don't you know the rules?
nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,978
- 1,870
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #339
The above fuckhead is as stupid as a box of used matches.....
NO, not everyone who is under oath tells the truth.......
YES.....if you lie under oath there may be severe repercussions......
NO....if you lie and you're NOT under oath, there will be no serious repercussions......you'll just be a lying moron,,,,,like Trump.....
If the above is still NOT clear to you, go hump a lamppost for relief.
Similar threads
- Locked
