- Thread starter
- #61
It has more to do with politics, for me."Renegotiated Trade", not Free Trade!
... I’m opposed to any other than a unilateral trade policy. Each sovereign nation should govern their own international trade policy.
I’m not opposed to international agreements for purposes other than economics.
I believe in the concept of “most favored nation that I believe is explicit or implied within every USA international agreement referring to regulating of goods at national borders.
The concept of “most favored nation” does not prohibit a nation from favoring their own entities but simply prohibits the agreeing nations from granting any other foreign nation more favorable treatment than is not granted to all other nation’s participating in the mutual international agreement. That I agree with.
If USA continues to internationally negotiate our border regulations, our trade policies will continue to be less beneficial to ourselves. I’m opposed to trading away the best interests of USA wage earners for the benefit of nations unwilling or unable to better compensate their own laborers.
I have not viewed with favor any existing or proposed USA trade policy that discriminates among foreign nations, or among the industries, or entities, or types of goods from any nation. ...
Laissez-fair, all the way, right wingers. Don't be socialists.
Daniel Palos,I’m opposed to international trade agreements for economic purposes.
I’m not opposed to international agreements for other mutual concerns such as concern for the earth’s environment or mutual agreed upon standards to facilitate trade transactions; (e.g. I’m a proponent of standard definitions of words and measurement methods).
Within the framework of our laws and federal jurisdictions, individual entities should negotiate their own trade transactions; that’s Laissez-fair.
Whatever, and under what conditions sovereign nations permit any entity from entering their jurisdictions, are the domestic concerns of the individual nations.
Respectfully, Supposn