Sandy Shanks
Gold Member
- Jul 10, 2018
- 3,550
- 1,025
- 210
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #661
Is Kevin McCarthy losing it?
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said without citing any law -- because there isn't any -- that it would be illegal for technology companies to cooperate with the January 6 select committee inquiry. Congressional investigations have obtained phone records before, and it is a violation of federal law not to comply with Congressional inquiries.
Then came the almost childish threat.
He said that if his party won control of the House, it would use its power to punish any that did."
Then select committee had to refute a recent claim by McCarthy that former President Donald Trump has been cleared by the Justice Department of any role in the insurrection.
McCarthy's statement is weak, pathetic even.
"That's where law enforcement comes. The FBI has investigated this. The Senate had bipartisan committees come back. And you know what they've found -- that there's no involvement. But this is purely political in how Nancy Pelosi has handled this," McCarthy said in the interview with KGET.
The statement is awkward and passive. "... there's no involvement." Who is not involved? Trump? Himself? Certain members of the House who refused to accept the results of the election? We don't know who McCarthy is talking about because he doesn't have the balls to tell us.
A week after the insurrection, McCarthy said on the House floor that, "The President bears responsibility for Wednesday's attack on Congress by mob rioters. ... He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding. These facts require immediate action by President Trump."
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said without citing any law -- because there isn't any -- that it would be illegal for technology companies to cooperate with the January 6 select committee inquiry. Congressional investigations have obtained phone records before, and it is a violation of federal law not to comply with Congressional inquiries.
Then came the almost childish threat.
He said that if his party won control of the House, it would use its power to punish any that did."
Then select committee had to refute a recent claim by McCarthy that former President Donald Trump has been cleared by the Justice Department of any role in the insurrection.
McCarthy's statement is weak, pathetic even.
"That's where law enforcement comes. The FBI has investigated this. The Senate had bipartisan committees come back. And you know what they've found -- that there's no involvement. But this is purely political in how Nancy Pelosi has handled this," McCarthy said in the interview with KGET.
The statement is awkward and passive. "... there's no involvement." Who is not involved? Trump? Himself? Certain members of the House who refused to accept the results of the election? We don't know who McCarthy is talking about because he doesn't have the balls to tell us.
A week after the insurrection, McCarthy said on the House floor that, "The President bears responsibility for Wednesday's attack on Congress by mob rioters. ... He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding. These facts require immediate action by President Trump."