A Problem With Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia

[PoliticalChic]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here


1.Civics is the stuff we’re all supposed to agree on and in terms of our nation that should begin here: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ Thomas Jefferson



2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

There is no way to see the connection with the biblical statement and not recognize that America was founded based on biblical precepts. That means that religion and religious freedom are inseparable from the heritage of America’s people. As is the belief that all of us are equal before the law.




3. The two terms “equal” and “freedom” come from the above and are the “civics” that all Americans are supposed to agree on.

You are not an American if you do not subscribe to those civics ideas.

And that is the problem with Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia.

And with the Democrat Party as it is so constituted: its agenda is based on treating people differently based on race, class and gender.



4. No matter how false the ‘education,’ in government school, no matter how they have corrupted your ideas, Democrat voters….I bet you are unable to make an argument against “equal” and “freedom.” Yet a vote for the Democrat Party is a vote against both.

And parroting the dogma that they have programmed into you without being able to explain and defend it, is redolent of Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia, not a hallmark of America or Americans.

If one of the two parties does not, any longer, agree that America is America due to basic, unalienable rights, such as religious liberty, equality, and free speech…
…..can that party claim to be American?

 

[Taz]

Godwin's Law

They obviously don't teach much in homskool, aside from comparing the Holocaust to a political party.

 

[Gdjjr]

2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

I thought John Locke's Second Treatise of Government and Natural Law was what he drew inspiration from-

The Second Treatise of Government places sovereignty into the hands of the people. Locke's fundamental argument is that people are equal and invested with natural rights in a state of nature in which they live free from outside rule. In the state of nature, natural law governs behavior, and each person has license to execute that law against someone who wrongs them by infringing on their rights.

They obviously don't teach much in homskool. Comparing the Holocaust to a political party.

Did you learn that (Godwins Law) in your formal education?

Did you also learn the holahoax is just that? Did your math teachers ever go over the numbers with you?
Did you learn that the victims would use that as a tool to get what they want from now on- which is only possible if one believes it?

Formal education is indoctrination- a proper education covers all the bases, not just some bases- and if not founded in truth and all the bases covered it is incomplete, therefore improper, that begs the question; why is it incomplete? The saying that comes to mind is; inquiring minds want to know- when curiosity is stifled (by formal education rules of engagement) the knowledge passed on is merely indoctrination, and the passing on of knowledge is all education is.

- a funny thing about knowledge; it isn't biased in its origin-
- a truth about education is; it evolves-
- the great thing about truth is it is constant

In a formal education which doesn't expound on the verbiage of the most important document ever, one has to wonder why- what is to be gained by not discussing something so important as a the founding of a government which is not acting according to the rules for it, or even the document which brought it about?

 

[DudleySmith]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

See Forrest MacDonald's The Jefferson Presidency for details, and also

Impact


Portrait of Henry St John attributed to Jonathan Richardson

Toryism
Part of the Politics series on

Characteristics

General topics

People

Related topics

v t e

Bolingbroke, Georgia, was named after him.

Republicanism in America
In the late 20th century, Bolingbroke was rediscovered by historians as a major influence on Voltaire, and on the American patriots John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Adams said that he had read all of Bolingbroke's works at least five times; indeed, Bolingbroke's works were widely read in the American colonies, where they helped provide the foundation for the emerging nation's devotion to republicanism. His vision of history as cycles of birth, growth, decline and death of a republic was influential in the colonies,[18] as was his contention on liberty: that one is "free not from the law, but by the law".[19]

Influence in Britain
Bute and George III derived their political ideas from The Patriot King.[20] Edmund Burke wrote his Vindication of Natural Society in imitation of Bolingbroke's style, but in refutation of his principles; and in the Reflections on the French Revolution he exclaims, "Who now reads Bolingbroke, who ever read him through?" Burke denied that Bolingbroke's words left "any permanent impression on his mind".[15] Benjamin Disraeli lionized Bolingbroke as the "Founder of Modern Toryism", eradicating its "absurd and odious doctrines", and establishing its mission to subvert "Whig attempts to transform the English Constitution into an oligarchy".[21]

The loss of Bolingbroke's great speeches was regretted by William Pitt more than that of the missing books of Livy and Tacitus. By the early 20th century, the writings and career of Bolingbroke would make a weaker impression than they made on contemporaries. He was thought by the author in his biography in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English (1910) to be a man of brilliant and versatile talents, but selfish, insincere and intriguing, defects of character which arguably led to his political ruin; and his writings were described as glittering, artificial and lacking philosophical merit.[22] Philip Chesney Yorke, his biographer in the Encyclopædia Britannica 11th Edition, commented that his abilities were exercised upon ephemeral objects, and not inspired by lasting or universal ideas.[15]

Enlightenment philosophy
Bolingbroke held certain views of opposition to church and theological teachings[1] that may have had influence during the Age of Enlightenment. The atheist antireligious French-German philosopher Baron d'Holbach quotes Bolingbroke in his political work Good Sense, in reference to Bolingbroke's statements against religion.[2]

Country Party
Bolingbroke was especially influential in stating the need and outlining the machinery of a systematic parliamentary opposition. Such an opposition he called a "country party" which he opposed to the court party. Country parties had been formed before, for instance after the king's speech to Parliament in November 1685, but Bolingbroke was the first to state the need for a continual opposition to the government. To his mind the spirit of liberty was threatened by the court party's lust for power.[23]

Liberty could only be safeguarded by an opposition party that used "constitutional methods and a legal course of opposition to the excesses of legal and ministerial power" (On the Idea of a Patriot King p. 117). He instructed the opposition party to "Wrest the power of government, if you can, out of the hands that employed it weakly and wickedly" (On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 42). This work could be done only by a homogeneous party "because such a party alone will submit to a drudgery of this kind" (On the idea of a Patriot King p. 170). It was not enough to be eager to speak, keen to act. "They who affect to head an opposition ... must be equal, at least, to those whom they oppose" (On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 58). The opposition had to be of a permanent nature to make sure that it would be looked at as a part of daily politics. It had on every occasion to confront the government (On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 61). He considered a party that systematically opposed the government to be more appealing than a party that did so occasionally (On the Spirit of Patriotism pp. 62, 63). This opposition had to prepare itself to control government (On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 61).

Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Moonglow]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here

A Problem With Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

 

[Moonglow]

Jefferson was equating that he was just as capable of governing as the Divine Rights of Kings. It has nothing to do with social equality.

 

[Moonglow]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

The code of the Anunnaki goes back further and is the basis of Judaism

 

[Gdjjr]

It has nothing to do with social equality.

Where is social equality mentioned?

 

[DudleySmith]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

The code of the Anunnaki goes back further and is the basis of Judaism

Which 'Judaism'? Pre or post-exile Babylonian exile? Must mean the pre-exile Mosaic Hebrewism.

 

[DudleySmith]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

Most were, yes. Not Jefferson.

 

[Gdjjr]

What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

That's kind of immaterial- he wrote and the wrting was signed making it official- had he not written what he did write what would we be doing differently today? What would we believe to be true-

See Forrest MacDonald's The Jefferson Presidency for details, and also

We aren't talking about his presidency- if there is something specific you want to interject, do so.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

Most were, yes. Not Jefferson.

"Not Jefferson."

Yes, Jefferson.

"Like Adams, Thomas Jefferson did not adhere to orthodox doctrine. Yet he often declared himself to be a Christian. “I am a Christian, he said, “in the only sense he [Jesus] wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines...”

As one of the leaders of the American Revolution, his views are well known. After all, this is the man who wrote in the Declaration of Independence that “all men… are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” You can’t get a much more explicit statement of belief than that.



These four founders – Washington, Adams, Jefferson and Franklin – were practical men with a sober view of human nature. They understood that man is morally weak and that religion provides the best encouragement and incentive to be good.

It does so, first and foremost, by teaching that choices have consequences. Not necessarily in the here and now, but most certainly in the hereafter – meted out by a just God.


It should come as no surprise, then, that Jefferson, in his second inaugural, asked for, “The favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our forefathers, as Israel of old, from their native land.”



And all of them were rooted in the Judeo-Christian values found in the Bible.
“52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh

 

[Moonglow]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

The code of the Anunnaki goes back further and is the basis of Judaism

Which 'Judaism'? Pre or post-exile Babylonian exile? Must mean the pre-exile Mosaic Hebrewism.

And there is Rabbinical Messianic Judaism.

 

[Agit8r]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

The code of the Anunnaki goes back further and is the basis of Judaism

I'm pretty sure that Rabbinical Judaism is based on Greco-Buddhism, just like Platonism and it's offshoot, Early Christianity were.

 

[surada]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here


1.Civics is the stuff we’re all supposed to agree on and in terms of our nation that should begin here: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ Thomas Jefferson



2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

There is no way to see the connection with the biblical statement and not recognize that America was founded based on biblical precepts. That means that religion and religious freedom are inseparable from the heritage of America’s people. As is the belief that all of us are equal before the law.




3. The two terms “equal” and “freedom” come from the above and are the “civics” that all Americans are supposed to agree on.

You are not an American if you do not subscribe to those civics ideas.

And that is the problem with Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia.

And with the Democrat Party as it is so constituted: its agenda is based on treating people differently based on race, class and gender.



4. No matter how false the ‘education,’ in government school, no matter how they have corrupted your ideas, Democrat voters….I bet you are unable to make an argument against “equal” and “freedom.” Yet a vote for the Democrat Party is a vote against both.

And parroting the dogma that they have programmed into you without being able to explain and defend it, is redolent of Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia, not a hallmark of America or Americans.

If one of the two parties does not, any longer, agree that America is America due to basic, unalienable rights, such as religious liberty, equality, and free speech…
…..can that party claim to be American?


View attachment 455000

Don't you have religious liberty? I do.

 

[surada]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here


1.Civics is the stuff we’re all supposed to agree on and in terms of our nation that should begin here: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ Thomas Jefferson



2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

There is no way to see the connection with the biblical statement and not recognize that America was founded based on biblical precepts. That means that religion and religious freedom are inseparable from the heritage of America’s people. As is the belief that all of us are equal before the law.




3. The two terms “equal” and “freedom” come from the above and are the “civics” that all Americans are supposed to agree on.

You are not an American if you do not subscribe to those civics ideas.

And that is the problem with Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia.

And with the Democrat Party as it is so constituted: its agenda is based on treating people differently based on race, class and gender.



4. No matter how false the ‘education,’ in government school, no matter how they have corrupted your ideas, Democrat voters….I bet you are unable to make an argument against “equal” and “freedom.” Yet a vote for the Democrat Party is a vote against both.

And parroting the dogma that they have programmed into you without being able to explain and defend it, is redolent of Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia, not a hallmark of America or Americans.

If one of the two parties does not, any longer, agree that America is America due to basic, unalienable rights, such as religious liberty, equality, and free speech…
…..can that party claim to be American?


View attachment 455000

Only white, male landowners could vote...and then there was slavery...people as chattel.

 

[surada]

Jefferson drew his inspiration form Bolingbrokism. Locke and the others he just named dropped in his propaganda writings. What he actually believed and practiced has almost nothing to do with what he wrote.

The Old Testament goes back some three millennia.

The Founders were deeply religious.

The code of the Anunnaki goes back further and is the basis of Judaism

What Code of the Anunnaki?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here


1.Civics is the stuff we’re all supposed to agree on and in terms of our nation that should begin here: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ Thomas Jefferson



2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

There is no way to see the connection with the biblical statement and not recognize that America was founded based on biblical precepts. That means that religion and religious freedom are inseparable from the heritage of America’s people. As is the belief that all of us are equal before the law.




3. The two terms “equal” and “freedom” come from the above and are the “civics” that all Americans are supposed to agree on.

You are not an American if you do not subscribe to those civics ideas.

And that is the problem with Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia.

And with the Democrat Party as it is so constituted: its agenda is based on treating people differently based on race, class and gender.



4. No matter how false the ‘education,’ in government school, no matter how they have corrupted your ideas, Democrat voters….I bet you are unable to make an argument against “equal” and “freedom.” Yet a vote for the Democrat Party is a vote against both.

And parroting the dogma that they have programmed into you without being able to explain and defend it, is redolent of Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia, not a hallmark of America or Americans.

If one of the two parties does not, any longer, agree that America is America due to basic, unalienable rights, such as religious liberty, equality, and free speech…
…..can that party claim to be American?


View attachment 455000

Don't you have religious liberty? I do.

"Don't you have religious liberty? I do."

Sooooo....you're what......a pagan?



Attacks on Religion...The Liberal Drumbeat
1. drum·beat
(drŭm′bēt′)
n.
Vehement,persistentadvocacyofacause:
drumbeat


2. Just as our government has no business funding the slaughter of the unborn....public schools should not be funded either based that drumbeat of attacks on religion:

"Student says teacher taught 'God is not real'
A Katy [Texas] seventh grader ...says her teacher asked the class to deny God exists.

... it all happened during a class assignment and now the school is apologizing.

...the teacher that came up with the assignment is distraught, and on Tuesday the principal determined the assignment wasn't something that was necessary for students.

[Jordan] Wooley originally answered the question 'there is no God' in two ways. "I said it was fact or opinion," said Wooley, adding she answered that way because "based on my religion and based on what I think and believe, I do not think it was a common place assertion."

Wooley says her seventh grade reading teacher at West Memorial Junior High School said both her answers were wrong and that she had to admit God wasn't real.
"It was really confusing to me at first because I didn't really know what to do, so the first thing I did was tell my mom," Wooley said.

Her mom Chantel couldn't believe it.
“That a kid was literally graded against her faith in [G]od in a classroom ....
"So the kids were caught in a Catch-22," said Chantel. "If they argued their faith, they were being told they were arguing against their faith and that happened in the classroom."Student says teacher taught 'God is not real'


Recently one of our Liberal pals posted this:

"...bible crazies coming out weekly talking on campus.." Why Liberals Hate Free Speech | Page 3 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


When asked to explain that reference..........he ran off and hid.
Now....where would he have learned that?

Here?
“A Lewis-Palmer High School student who was told she must apologize for mentioning Jesus in a valedictorian speech or not receive a diploma…” Monument teen appeals over Jesus graduation speech




Liberal bigotry and bias openly on public display.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
".... the public school indoctrinators formerly known as “teachers.“ The Obama power grab--supported by his adoring adherents--has just about reached the most monumental proportion of all time.

... Obama may have finally reached the apex of his desires; that of replacing God with himself.

Recently, at New Jersey’s B. Bernice Youngs Elementary School, not only were second grade students forced to sing a song of praise to Obama (the parents were not notified that this was occurring) but, Obama’s name was substituted for that of Jesus in the accompanying words and music.

... Could this be the reason that the atheists have fought so hard to get rid of Christianity? Is this secular messiah their planned replacement? Even more important a question to Christians and Messianic Jews is ‘does this portend biblical end times prophecy’?

.... school systems and willing adherents are pushing to corrupt and take over the very souls of our children. ... the now largely Marxist government-run US public schools system is taking advantage of our children’s lack of defenses in order to indoctrinate them into the growing Obama-Marxist secular utopia."
Public Schools’ Praise Song: Next Step Praying To Obama? - Conservative Crusader
--------------------------------------------------


"...a kid was literally graded against her faith in [G]od in a classroom ....


3. "On Tuesday, Katy [Texas government school] released a statement saying, in part, that the assignment was intended to encourage critical thinking and dialogue and not question any students' religious beliefs.
[A truly indefensible excuse.]


"Are we talking about impressionable 12- or 13-year-olds or are we talking about 24-year-olds in college who already have a firm grasp of the world around them?"


"I love reading so for me personally to have to fail reading because of what my beliefs are just shocked me," Wooley said.
Wooley says the assignment was in fact graded, so she says she would've had to have contradicted her faith to pass. ... We went to the teacher's home for a response but she never came to the door.

Katy ISD said in a statement that the assignment was to encourage critical thinking and dialogue and not question any student's religious beliefs.
Student says teacher taught 'God is not real'


The assignment was graded....and to pass, a student had to deny her faith.




Anyone believe that that assignment was designed "to encourage critical thinking" rather than advance a political agenda?

Has anyone ever seen 'critical thinking assignments' in government schools dealing with the Left’s love affair with Marxism, Socialism, Racialism, the slaughter of 100 million during the last century, the Command Economy, or public debt?





Both the bias and hatred of traditional American values, and the failure to educate, are reasons to end public schools monopoly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The context that explains the antipathy to religion by the Left, is the following:


For an historical perspective....two eras of American history stand out.

This nation was founded by religious individuals, based on a religious foundation, ....

4. First:
"The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian.“52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh

a. Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.” Coulter

b. "The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were... the general principles of Christianity. ...I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." - Letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813

John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, June 28th, 1813, from Quincy. The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence Between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams, edited by Lester J. Cappon, 1988, the University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, pp. 338-340.




5. Then, the explanation for the great sea change in America:

All of that changed during the Roosevelt Administration, when a widely popularPresident embraced communist Joseph Stalin, and provided a home for communism in this nation.


a. "There is no God:
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor. The Schwarz Report | Essays


And this view infected the public schools......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The corruption of the public schools is bad enough....but it is not the only point of attack on traditional religion by Liberals/Democrats....


6. "Congressman: IRS asked pro-life group about 'the content of their prayers'

During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa.

“Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared.

“Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?”

Fromtheir report:

Coalition for Life of Iowa found itself in the IRS’s crosshairs when the group applied for tax exempt status in October 2008. Nearly ten months of interrogation about the group’s opposition to Planned Parenthood included a demand by a Ms. Richards from the IRS’ Cincinnati office unlawfully insisted that all board members sign a sworn declaration promising not to picket/protest Planned Parenthood.

Further questioning by the IRS requested detailed information about the content of the group’s prayer meetings, educational seminars, and signs their members hold outside Planned Parenthood."
Congressman: IRS asked pro-life group about 'the content of their prayers'


And:
Congress Receives Irrefutable Evidence of IRS Harassment of Pro-Life Organizations | Thomas More Society



So much for freedom of thought, and conscience, and religion, under Liberal/Democrat governance.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Faux Christian-in-Chief provided a peek into his true beliefs:


7. "Speaking in Ireland this week, President Obama stated that Catholic schools were divisive:

“If towns remain divided—if Catholics have their schools and buildings and Protestants have theirs, if we can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation.” On Thursday, the American Catholics for Religious Freedom fired back on President Obama’s words to 2,000 young people at the G8 Summit, stating,“President Obama’s anti-faith, secular agenda was shamefully on full display yesterday when he told the young people of Northern Ireland that Catholic education and other faith-based schools were divisive and an obstacle to peace.

All Americans of faith should be outraged by these comments which clearly telegraph the President’s belief system and are in fact at their core even anti-American.”

American Catholics for Religious Freedom points out that the [Liberal] media has completely ignored the story, and adds, “Secular progressives like President Obama ignore the truth that faith-based education is a component of the Religious Freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.

He can’t bear the thought that Catholic and parochial schools not only teach important values but consistently produce better educational results at lower cost than America’s failing public schools.


The President’s troubling values are showing here in a way that demonstrate just how dangerous this Administration is and how committed it is to eroding the rights of all people of faith.”
Catholics Fire Back at Obama over School Comments: 'Anti-Faith, Secular Agenda Shamelessly on Full Display' - Breitbart

Couldn't have said it better!



What a fool that man is.

1. Urban parochial schools were serving a growing share of disadvantaged and frequently non-Catholic youngsters. In a study published in 1990, for example, the Rand Corporation found that, of the Catholic school students in these Catholic high schools in New York City, 75 to 90 percent were black or Hispanic. Finn, "Troublemaker"

i. Over 66 percentof the Catholic school graduates received the New York State Regents diploma to signify completion of an academically demanding college preparatory curriculum, while only about 5 percent of the public school students received this distinction;

ii. The Catholic high schools graduated 95 percent of their students each year, while the public schools graduated slightly more 50 percent of their senior class;

iii. The Catholic school students achieved an average combined SAT score of 803, while the public school students' average combined SAT score was 642;

iv. 60 percent of the Catholic school black students scored above the national average for black students on the SAT, and over 70 percent of public school black students scored below the same national average.

« More recent studies confirm these observations. Why Catholic Schools Spell Success For America's Inner-CityChildren



Liberal government schools.....almost as great a failure as the current President.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





8. Government (read 'Liberal/Democrat') schools take every opportunity to shear religion away from the culture, and indicate it as a pejorative.


"Washington high school coach placed on leave for praying on field
(CNN)A Seattle-area assistant high school football coach has been placed on paid leave for continuing to pray on the field after games, weeks after his school district warned him not to do so.

Bremerton High School assistant coach Joe Kennedy, whose suspension Wednesday came a day before the school's final regular game of the season, cannot resume his job until he agrees not to pray while on duty as a coach,the Bremerton School District said in a letter posted online.

"While the district appreciates Kennedy's many positive contributions to the BHS football program ... Kennedy's conduct poses a genuine risk that the district will be liable for violating the federal and state constitutional rights of students or others,"the letter reads.

Kennedy's case made headlines after the district ordered him in September to stop on-field post-game prayers, saying his years-long practice could be perceived as district endorsement of religion in violation of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
[Of course that's a Liberal lie: it in no way violates the first amendment- it actually is a result of same.]


Kennedy, who says he has prayed at the 50-yard line after games since he was hired in August 2008, initially abided by the directive. But, with a religious freedom legal organization asserting that he had a right to do so, he prayed at midfield after the school's October 16 homecoming game.


The coach says that his prayers are private, and that while some students end up joining him, they do so of their own volition.
[Totally voluntary, no one is coerced to join in.]


The Liberty Institute, the Texas-based group representing Kennedy, said it will sue the school on his behalf, arguing the school was violating his rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, saying it wasn't honoring his request for religious accommodation.
[Yipppeeee!]


"We tried to meet with the school officials in person, but they refused to meet. We were only able to have a brief hour and a half call with their lawyer, and the result was a letter banning private prayer just a few hours before last Friday's game," the institute's deputy chief counsel Hiram Sasser said in a post reacting to Kennedy's suspension. "It is unfortunate this school district is choosing litigation instead of a simple meeting." Bremerton High School coach placed on leave for praying on field - CNN.com



Remember...contrary to the Liberal lie above, there is no such prescription as 'separation of church and state' in any......any....of the memorializing documents of the United States.

The phrase was inserted into jurisprudence by an official of the KKK.


First amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. Government (read 'Liberal/Democrat') schools take every opportunity to shear religion away from the culture, and indicate it as a pejorative.


"Washington high school coach placed on leave for praying on field
(CNN)A Seattle-area assistant high school football coach has been placed on paid leave for continuing to pray on the field after games, weeks after his school district warned him not to do so.

Bremerton High School assistant coach Joe Kennedy, whose suspension Wednesday came a day before the school's final regular game of the season, cannot resume his job until he agrees not to pray while on duty as a coach,the Bremerton School District said in a letter posted online.

"While the district appreciates Kennedy's many positive contributions to the BHS football program ... Kennedy's conduct poses a genuine risk that the district will be liable for violating the federal and state constitutional rights of students or others,"the letter reads.

Kennedy's case made headlines after the district ordered him in September to stop on-field post-game prayers, saying his years-long practice could be perceived as district endorsement of religion in violation of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
[Of course that's a Liberal lie: it in no way violates the first amendment- it actually is a result of same.]


Kennedy, who says he has prayed at the 50-yard line after games since he was hired in August 2008, initially abided by the directive. But, with a religious freedom legal organization asserting that he had a right to do so, he prayed at midfield after the school's October 16 homecoming game.


The coach says that his prayers are private, and that while some students end up joining him, they do so of their own volition.
[Totally voluntary, no one is coerced to join in.]


The Liberty Institute, the Texas-based group representing Kennedy, said it will sue the school on his behalf, arguing the school was violating his rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, saying it wasn't honoring his request for religious accommodation.
[Yipppeeee!]


"We tried to meet with the school officials in person, but they refused to meet. We were only able to have a brief hour and a half call with their lawyer, and the result was a letter banning private prayer just a few hours before last Friday's game," the institute's deputy chief counsel Hiram Sasser said in a post reacting to Kennedy's suspension. "It is unfortunate this school district is choosing litigation instead of a simple meeting." Bremerton High School coach placed on leave for praying on field - CNN.com



Remember...contrary to the Liberal lie above, there is no such prescription as 'separation of church and state' in any......any....of the memorializing documents of the United States.

The phrase was inserted into jurisprudence by an official of the KKK.


First amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The inability to distinguish between civics and politics. See if it resonates here


1.Civics is the stuff we’re all supposed to agree on and in terms of our nation that should begin here: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ Thomas Jefferson



2. Where did Jefferson get that idea?

1:26, KJV: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

There is no way to see the connection with the biblical statement and not recognize that America was founded based on biblical precepts. That means that religion and religious freedom are inseparable from the heritage of America’s people. As is the belief that all of us are equal before the law.




3. The two terms “equal” and “freedom” come from the above and are the “civics” that all Americans are supposed to agree on.

You are not an American if you do not subscribe to those civics ideas.

And that is the problem with Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia.

And with the Democrat Party as it is so constituted: its agenda is based on treating people differently based on race, class and gender.



4. No matter how false the ‘education,’ in government school, no matter how they have corrupted your ideas, Democrat voters….I bet you are unable to make an argument against “equal” and “freedom.” Yet a vote for the Democrat Party is a vote against both.

And parroting the dogma that they have programmed into you without being able to explain and defend it, is redolent of Nazi Germany And Bolshevik Russia, not a hallmark of America or Americans.

If one of the two parties does not, any longer, agree that America is America due to basic, unalienable rights, such as religious liberty, equality, and free speech…
…..can that party claim to be American?


View attachment 455000

Only white, male landowners could vote...and then there was slavery...people as chattel.

And, those Founders:

1. Usually, the ‘Founders’ refers to these six: Madison, Jefferson and Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Franklin.
   1. The three non-Southerners worked tirelessly against slavery.
   2. While reading Ron Chernow’s book Alexander Hamilton, though, I found out that Hamilton was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. During the 1780s, Hamilton was one of the founders of the New York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves, which was instrumental in the abolition of slavery in the state of New York. After reading about Alexander Hamilton’s work for the New York Manumission Society, I gained a greater appreciation of Alexander Hamiltonhttp://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/alexander-hamilton-and-the-new-york-manumission-society/
   3. Many of the other Founding Fathers were activists like Alexander Hamilton. In 1787 Benjamin Franklin agree to serve as president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, which set out to abolish slavery and set up programs to help freed slaves to become good citizens and improve the conditions of free African Americans. On February 12, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society presented a petition to the House of Representatives calling for the federal government to take steps for the gradual abolition of slavery and end the slave trade. As a young lawyer, Thomas Jefferson represented a slave in court attempting to be set free and during the 1770s and 1780s, Jefferson had many several attempts to pass legislation to gradually abolish slavery and end the slave trade. John Jay was the first president of the New York Manumission Society and was active in Society’s efforts to abolish slavery. Ibid.

2. An excellent read on the matter is a brilliant book called Miracle in Philadelphia, by Catherine Drinker Bowen, which recounts the actual history and debates around the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Slavery was a huge issue during that convention, and many of the Founding Fathers wanted it outlawed, but ran into an impasse after many hours of debate with the southern colonies whose agricultural productivity depended on it.

The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with a compromise involving the issue of apportionment.

The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.

The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.

The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war.


Media - Latest News
Big Journalism debunks the spin and narratives from the Democrat-media complex, and rips the lid off faux media objectivity.
bigjournalism.com




Have you ever read a book????


You do know what a book is, don't you?