- Banned
- #1
A Post-Racial Anthology? by Amiri Baraka
Even poetry is not immune from marginalization, bigotry, or racism, apparently. -poet
The blurb from the publisher W.W. Norton says that the book
is not just another poetry anthology. It is a gathering of poems that demonstrate what happens when writers in a marginalized community collectively turn from dedicating their writing to political, social, and economic struggles, and instead devote themselves, as artists, to the art of their poems and to the ideas they embody. These poets bear witness to the interior landscape of their own individual selves or examine the private or personal worlds of  invented personae and, therefore, of  human beings living in our modern and postmodern worlds.
My God, what imbecilic garbage! You mean, forget the actual world, have nothing to do with the real world and real people    ...    invent it all! You can see how that would be some far-right instruction for a marginalized community, especially one with the history of the Afro-American people: We dont want to hear all that stuff    ...    make up a pleasanter group of beings with pleasanter, more literary lives than yourselves and then we will perhaps consider it art!
This embarrassing gobbledygook was probably a paraphrase of the editors personal gobble. But the copywriters might be given a temporary pass because they know nothing about Afro-American literature; 
it is the Norton suits that could be looked at askance because of their ignorant hiring practices.
To get a closer view of where Rowell comes in, look at the quote that he gives from the poet he constantly cites as poetic mentor and as an example of what great poetry should be. The quote is where Rowell got the title of the book, Angles of Ascent:
He strains, an awk-
ward patsy, sweating strains
leaping falling. Then  
silken rustling in the air,
the angle of ascent
achieved.
 From For a Young Artist, by Robert Hayden
Rowell says this is an image for the poets struggle and transcendence. But Lord, I never did see myself or the poets I admired and learned from as awkward patsies!......But this is simply a list of poets Rowell likes. I cannot see any stylistic tendency that would render them a movement or a coherent aesthetic. Perhaps their only commonality is their resistance to the Black Arts Movement. Komunyakaa says:
Growing up in the South, having closely observed what hatred does to the human spirit, how it corrupts and diminishes    ...    
I unconsciously disavowed any direct association with the Black Arts Movement.
Are we being faulted for hating slavery, white supremacy, and racism? For trying to fight back, just as the Deacons for Defense and Justice did by routing the Klan in Komunyakaas own hometown of Bogalusa, Louisiana?......
Rowells icy epilogue is too comic to be tragic, though it is both. It is a cold class dismissal by would-be mainstream Negroes on the path to mediocrity:
Without the fetters of narrow political and social demands that have nothing to do with the production of artistic texts, black American poets, since the Civil Rights Movement and Black Power Movement, have created an extraordinary number of 
aesthetically deft poems that both challenge the concept of the American poem and extend the dimensions of American poetry.
This is poppycock at its poppiest and cockiest. You mean the struggle for our humanity is a fetter (to whom? Negroes seeking tenure in these white schools who dare not mumble a cross word?). Why is the struggle for equal rights and self-determination narrow? To whom? Racists? You think Fred Douglass was not one of the greatest artists of the nineteenth century because he kept demanding an end to slavery? Bah, Humbug!
As for the Black Power movements death, last I heard we have an Afro-American president who has taught the Republicans the value of community organizing twice. But what Rowell proves is that the old Black-White dichotomy is in the past, at least on the surface. The struggle, as my wife Amina always says, is about whose side youre on. Romney and them lost because they dont even know what country theyre in. Neither does Charles Rowell.
Even poetry is not immune from marginalization, bigotry, or racism, apparently. -poet