DrLove
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #201
The subject is not current emissions.
LOL!
In 20 years, they'll have left us in the dust unless something changes real quick
You lied when you said, "They've left us in the dust pal"
So, how many new nuclear power plants should we build?
Yes, on investments in infrastructure and clean energy they HAVE left us in the dust ...
While Dear Leader has done NOTHING.
I'll pass on more nukes until we can figure out what to do with the waste.
One day in a nuclear age
They may understand our rage
They build machines that they can't control
And bury the waste in a great big hole
Deadly for ten thousand years
Is Carbon-14
I'll pass on more nukes until we can figure out what to do with the waste.
CO2 is an existential threat, 12 years until it kills us, or was AOC lying?
Deadly for ten thousand years
Is Carbon-14
Sting, still an idiot.
I'm not an AOC fan or a New Green Deal Fan.
Neither is Uncle Joe - So stop repeating THAT lie.
Sting? He could intellectually run circles around your sad ass.
Sting? He could intellectually run circles around your sad ass.
If he thinks C-14 is deadly for 10,000 years, he's dumber than you.
Might you LEARN something at some point?
Seems doubtful ...
Carbon-14 goes through radioactive beta decay:
14
6C
→ 14
7N
+
e−
+
ν
e
By emitting an electron and an electron antineutrino, one of the neutrons in the carbon-14 atom decays to a proton and the carbon-14 (half-life of 5,700 ± 40 years[6]) decays into the stable (non-radioactive) isotope nitrogen-14.
Donald's NRC pegs it at 1000 years. Then again, he has corrupted all science and shelved all scientific agencies - Whatever man.
NRC: Backgrounder on Radioactive Waste
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, protecting people and the environment.
www.nrc.gov