A message to America

[g5000]

One of the saddest things is a lot people consider there gun just as important at there bible. Basically there gun has become a idol to them, and if God tested them, and ask them to give there gun up they would refuse to obey God, and cling to there gun as a idol.

One of the saddest things is when dipshits like you missed that day in class when one of American's fundamental principles, inalienable rights, was explained.

And it is really, really sad that you think the government is bigger than God.

 

[eflatminor]

Yea, cuz if there was a law against guns, criminals wouldn't have guns. Works beautifully in Mexico!

It certainly works in places like Japan, and Britain where gun violence its almost nonexsistant.

And it's a disaster in Mexico. But let's look at your examples. Not only did crime, including gun crime SKYROCKET after England banned firearms, their violent crime rate is higher than than US. So, sure, firearms are more likely to be used in crime in the US, but you're much more likely to be a victim of crime in the UK. Not surprising considering no one there can properly defend themselves. That's quite a victory...

When we contrast per capita homicide rates with per capita firearm ownership rates between western countries, the data shows zero correlation between the availability of guns and the overall homicide rate. Yes, we have more firearms, but that does not correlate to more murders or violent crime. For all our guns, the US barely makes the top 100 in countries with the worst murder rates per capita.

Japan certainly is not a gun oriented culture. Yet, their murder rate is almost 1 per 100,000, while in the US, there are about 3.2 murders per 100,000 people each year by weapons other than firearms. This means that even if firearms in the U.S. could be eliminated, the U.S. would still have three times the murder rate of the Japanese. So, you can argue we are a more violent country that Japan, but you can't blame it on firearms.

Of course, not all is sunshine and rainbows in Japan. Japan’s murder rate may be low, its suicide rate is over 20 per 100,000 people. Combined, Japanese are being murdered and committing suicide at a rate of about 21 per 100,000. In the U.S., our combined murder and suicide rate is also about 21!

In order for a gun ban to be effective in the US it would have to be enforced with overwhelming force from the National Guard or Military as this country is absolutely flooded with guns, and many people idolize there guns almost like pagan gods. Any gun ban in the US that is not enforced by heavy, and aggressive National Guard or Military presence is not going be very effective in the US.

Yea, good luck with that. The Supreme Court has ruled. It's an individual right. You're not taking anything from the People. That you would support such action suggests you are ignorant to the history of what can happen to a disarmed populace.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It was a 1995 show about the AWB, dumbass.

If she was in favor of banning all guns, are you really stupid enough to think this is the sole piece of evidence that would exist?

Pull your head out of the piss bucket.

TWO WORDS
Did you say Assault Weapons

I gave you a link, dipshit, of the entire 60 Minutes show. Feinstein is in it mulitple times talking about assault weapons. She is angry because she wanted to ban the sale of assault weapons which already exist, but was not able to get enough votes to do so. Therefore, the AWB did not stop people from being able to get high capacity magazines or assault weapons. That is what the clip is from, and that is what the show is about.

You saw an out of context clip and drank the piss.

And now you are being willfully blind by refusing to watch the full 60 Minutes episode, because that would blow your tiny mind's confirmation bias out of the water.

Dude the woman doesn't want anyone armed you've drank way to much obama kool aid.

 

[g5000]

TWO WORDS
Did you say Assault Weapons

I gave you a link, dipshit, of the entire 60 Minutes show. Feinstein is in it mulitple times talking about assault weapons. She is angry because she wanted to ban the sale of assault weapons which already exist, but was not able to get enough votes to do so. Therefore, the AWB did not stop people from being able to get high capacity magazines or assault weapons. That is what the clip is from, and that is what the show is about.

You saw an out of context clip and drank the piss.

And now you are being willfully blind by refusing to watch the full 60 Minutes episode, because that would blow your tiny mind's confirmation bias out of the water.

Dude the woman doesn't want anyone armed you've drank way to much obama kool aid.

She wanted to ban assault weapons, not all guns.

You have missed something even more important in her statement. She wanted to ban possession of assault weapons. Her statement implies that if she got her way, they would have come to the houses of everyone who owns an assault weapons and confiscated them.

There is only one way this could be made possible. The government would be using a list of all registered guns.

I have been pretty much ambivalent about gun registration, but the idea of it being used precisely for this purpose gives me a pretty big shove in the direction of being opposed to gun registration.

So take that for whatever its worth.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I gave you a link, dipshit, of the entire 60 Minutes show. Feinstein is in it mulitple times talking about assault weapons. She is angry because she wanted to ban the sale of assault weapons which already exist, but was not able to get enough votes to do so. Therefore, the AWB did not stop people from being able to get high capacity magazines or assault weapons. That is what the clip is from, and that is what the show is about.

You saw an out of context clip and drank the piss.

And now you are being willfully blind by refusing to watch the full 60 Minutes episode, because that would blow your tiny mind's confirmation bias out of the water.

Dude the woman doesn't want anyone armed you've drank way to much obama kool aid.

She wanted to ban assault weapons, not all guns.

You have missed something even more important in her statement. She wanted to ban possession of assault weapons. Her statement implies that if she got her way, they would have come to the houses of everyone who owns an assault weapons and confiscated them.

There is only one way this could be made possible. The government would be using a list of all registered guns.

I have been pretty much ambivalent about gun registration, but the idea of it being used precisely for this purpose gives me a pretty big shove in the direction of being opposed to gun registration.

So take that for whatever its worth.

I'm not going to argue with you about wake the **** up. She doesn't want anyone armed other than the elite.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Maybe you should listen to her say what she said one more time.
No the title is not a lie.

Maybe you should listen to the narrator before Feinstein speaks. She is clearly talking about an AWB.

Jesus, you really do drink the piss, don't you?

That clip is from a 60 minutes video. Why don't you watch the whole thing, dipshit, and see for yourself.

Did she mention Assault weapons?
Pull the stupid from your brain.

Would there be anything left?