A little test what people think in regard to the Renee Good business

[IDIOCRACY]

I think these are fair questions. I've added a real good video that shows what happened, however, you're probably best served to turn the volume off, because their account of events are dishonest for the sake of left narrations - They practically explain why your eyes must suck (cough!). Add why with the answers if you care to.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. CORRECT or INCORRECT

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. CORRECT or INCORRECT

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT or INCORRECT

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

10. Renee was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by REPUBLICANS or DEMOCRATS?

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? HERO TRAVISTY

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT or INCORRECT

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT or INCORRECT

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? WHY?

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT or INCORRECT

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT or INCORRECT

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT or INCORRECT

24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. CORRECT or INCORRECT

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs

 

[IDIOCRACY]

My answers.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. NO

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. NO

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. INCORRECT

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. INCORRECT

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT

10. Renee was justified being there. INCORRECT. She has the right. What she lacks is a valid reason - Putting lives in danger over mass-hysteria built by the left sure aint it.

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by Republican or Democrat? DEMOCRATS

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. Hard to say really, trigger happy? **** I don't know, and sure can't tell, and you probably can't either. All I know is Renee fucked up and paid as a result, and yes, she clearly put the Agent's life in danger. She had a total disregard for his life, as clearly shown by video, and paid the price for it.

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? TRAVESTY ONLY

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? TDS - Lib-Democrats do as tamed for mass-hysteria, and intellectual honesty is lost.

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT

24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. INCORRECT, the left create their own frenzy and declare it reality.

 

[gtopa1]

My answers.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. NO

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. NO

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. INCORRECT

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. INCORRECT

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT

10. Renee was justified being there. INCORRECT. She has the right. What she lacks is a valid reason - Putting lives in danger over mass-hysteria built by the left sure aint it.

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by Republican or Democrat? DEMOCRATS

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. Hard to say really. All I know is Renee fucked up and paid as a result, and yes, she clearly put the officer's life in danger, and had a total disregard for his life, as clearly shown by video.

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? TRAVESTY ONLY

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? TDS - Lib-Democrats do as tamed by mass-hysteria, and intellectual honesty is lost.

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT
24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. INCORRECT, the left create their own frenzy and declare it reality.

I can't find anything that I disagree with apart from 16; I see ZERO character wrt Rebecca. It's like being sorry for a crime AFTER being caught. No character at all. The "and bring your money too" is imo a low act of scummery. Just her seeking a payout.

Greg

 

[IDIOCRACY]

I can't find anything that I disagree with apart from 16; I see ZERO character wrt Rebecca. It's like being sorry for a crime AFTER being caught. No character at all. The "and bring your money too" is imo a low act of scummery. Just her seeking a payout.

Greg

Noted, that is a valid point for certain.

 

[1srelluc]

Give it a rest.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Give it a rest.

True story. That said☺ I don't expect dems. to respond really, life becomes a challenge for them when it's clear as day.

 

[Cassandro]

Renee was more than 50% responsible for her own death.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Unfortunately the Democrats you would like to answer never will.

Questions are like kryptonite for Democrats.

 

[toobfreak]

Ugh! ICE attack! ICE-attack!

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Unfortunately the Democrats you would like to answer never will.

Questions are like kryptonite for Democrats.

Yeah, I invited IM2 and Gator to come here to back-up their BS threads on the subject. No sign of em, I wonder why?☺

Lib Democrats are so brave, and smart too.

 

[Darlo kittu]

Again Saint Renee brought this on herself. ICE did not follow her. She was out looking for ICE

She refused to comply with their orders. Her gal pal told her to drive off

She pointed her 4000.pd weapon at a law enforcement officer

She got shot. Why is that a shock to anyone?

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Again Saint Renee brought this on herself. ICE did not follow her. She was out looking for ICE

She refused to comply with their orders. Her gal pal told her to drive off

She pointed her 4000.pd weapon at a law enforcement officer

She got shot. Why is that a shock to anyone?

ANSWER: TDS
QUITE LITERALLY MASS-HYSTERIA

Mass hysteria, or mass psychogenic illness, is a social phenomenon where a group experiences the rapid spread of physical or emotional symptoms (like dizziness, fainting, anxiety, or bizarre behaviors) without a clear, organic cause, often triggered by collective stress, belief, or social contagion within a cohesive community, spreading through seeing or hearing about symptoms in others. It involves irrational group excitement or panic and can manifest as psychogenic illness, collective hallucinations, or frenzied actions.

 

[Darlo kittu]

Answer: TDS
aka MASS-HYSTERIA

Mass hysteria, or mass psychogenic illness, is a social phenomenon where a group experiences the rapid spread of physical or emotional symptoms (like dizziness, fainting, anxiety, or bizarre behaviors) without a clear, organic cause, often triggered by collective stress, belief, or social contagion within a cohesive community, spreading through seeing or hearing about symptoms in others. It involves irrational group excitement or panic and can manifest as psychogenic illness, collective hallucinations, or frenzied actions.

Poor devil. Please seek helo

 

[Luckyone]

I think these are fair questions. I've added a real good video that shows what happened, however, you're probably best served to turn the volume off, because their account of events are dishonest for the sake of left narrations - They practically explain why your eyes must suck (cough!). Add why with the answers if you care to.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

You must first prove that they were harassing ICE. I see no proof of that!

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO]

See answer above

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

At no time did the car strike the ICE agent. The video with the noise of her supposedly striking him can be wrong as that striking noise could be him striking his gun against the car or many other things

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Correct

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect as she started her car forward with the tires already to leaning to the right

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect. Videos prove otherwise but simple common sense should tell you that "how could he shoot her in the FRONT video (to the left of her window) is he was struck by her as she was trying to flee. He had to be aiming at her before she supposedly was trying to hit him, because if she HIT HIM, how could he shoot her in the front?

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Correct

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect, he was never in a position to be hit, to start with.

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect, she was never a threat to his life

10. Renee was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

neither correct not incorrect. Until we know exactly where she dropped of her kid and where she was looking to go thereafter, we cannot make that determination

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

No, the first ICE car had moved past her car with no problem, meaning the others could have done the same and nothing would have happened to anyone

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by REPUBLICANS or DEMOCRATS?

how do we know she was "provoked" at all. After all, her being LGBT does not automatically mean she is a POLITICAL person

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Do they? prove it

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Correct. They are there to address problems and as such, always put someone in danger

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? HERO TRAVISTY

Travesty

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT or INCORRECT

correct but here is something that needs to be mentioned: Renee had never previously participated in a protest and was not an activist.

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect. Trump has fucked it up

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? WHY?

Trump was not involved then

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Correct but they must be addressing the proper people that they were originally set up for

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect as he was never struck

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Not to the point of killing someone who is not an immediate a clear danger to them

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

correct on the ******* up but incorrect on disregard for the agent's life

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Provoke and test, no. they are not correct in that

24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. CORRECT or INCORRECT

Incorrect. Problem with Trump is who he is. No one is inventing anything

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs

 

[IDIOCRACY]

You must first prove that they were harassing ICE. I see no proof of that! This is a dishonest answer. That or you're ignorant, pick one. They were interfering with ICE all day, and in fact parked their car on the road to accomplish just that.

See answer above Right, and you fucked up.


At no time did the car strike the ICE agent. The video with the noise of her supposedly striking him can be wrong as that striking noise could be him striking his gun against the car or many other things. Check out Luckyonce people. The video is right here in black and white and he chose to say it's green,


Correct Wrong, incorrect. He can't see the tires and it doesn't matter, because she struck him.

Incorrect as she started her car forward with the tires already to leaning to the right. Watch the video again. She steered full to the right after striking him. She steered slightly to the right as she struck him.


Incorrect. Videos prove otherwise but simple common sense should tell you that "how could he shoot her in the FRONT video (to the left of her window) is he was struck by her as she was trying to flee. He had to be aiming at her before she supposedly was trying to hit him, because if she HIT HIM, how could he shoot her in the front? Don't talk, just watch the video.

Correct...I'm positive that's a lie. He escaped injury because of his doing. If he had not reacted she'd have run him down, pretty simple. Whether or not she steered to the right doesn't matter.

Incorrect, he was never in a position to be hit, to start with. Oh, so you're a dumbass then. Anyone with an operable brain can clearly see he was in front of a moving vehicle and was struck. This isn't rocket science, perhaps watch the video without your wife's guardianship.

Incorrect, she was never a threat to his life....Sure, neat. You should stand in front of cars escaping law enforcement then, after all, it's not life threating.

neither correct not incorrect. Until we know exactly where she dropped of her kid and where she was looking to go thereafter, we cannot make that determination.. Wrong, they were harassing ICE..Neat how you interject "what about the children". This is not debatable, you're in denial.

No, the first ICE car had moved past her car with no problem, meaning the others could have done the same and nothing would have happened to anyone.....You dumbass, it's his livelihood to be there. Doesn't matter some people moved safely, the fact is he was in front of the car and was struck as Renee attempted to escape detainment.


how do we know she was "provoked" at all. After all, her being LGBT does not automatically mean she is a POLITICAL person. Oh I see, she was just minding her own business as she was harassing ICE. You know damned well she was provoked by your Democrats.

Do they? prove it....Yes, libs put people in danger, ever hear the one Trump was shot, for instance? How about Charlie Kirk? Why are you denying Renee put people in danger after seeing she struck an agent as they tried to escape detainment? Oh that's right, she didn't cuz you're brain is misswired by Democracks

Correct. They are there to address problems and as such, always put someone in danger. Always put someone in danger he says. I hear liberals are smart and stuff, more educated. How is it you missed grade school with, "refrain from using always, every time, all the time and everyone, because it's generally not true"

Travesty...We agree

correct but here is something that needs to be mentioned: Renee had never previously participated in a protest and was not an activist. Doesnt matter does it? Fact is she was protesting and interfering with official activity. BTW, word on the street is she was a member for regularly protesting ICE.

Incorrect. Trump has fucked it up..Hear that people, Minneapolis is fucked up cuz of Trump


Trump was not involved then...Lucky's response as to why left didn't protest deportations when Obama was POTUS. BINGO Lucky, BINGO.

Correct but they must be addressing the proper people that they were originally set up for.. We agree but you're trying to establish they should only confront illegals which is clearly not true. They must address snowflakes too, like Renee, and they must address suspected illegals.

Incorrect as he was never struck....I suppose I could suggest you watch the video, but the video could be tatooed throughout your house and you'll remain in denial to validate your...............your..............Emotions and ideologies.


Not to the point of killing someone who is not an immediate a clear danger to them. I guess being struck by a car during the car's attempt to escape detainment isn't a danger then.

correct on the ******* up but incorrect on disregard for the agent's life. This just in, according to Luckyonce a person knowingly striking someone during escape from detainment is not an act of disregard for an agent's life.


Provoke and test, no. they are not correct in that..Seems we agree.


Incorrect. Problem with Trump is who he is. No one is inventing anything...Fair enough, I can't change your feelings.

Props to Luckyone, the only liberal democrat with balls to express their answers to straight-forward questions. Say luckyonce, come to the right side, just don't tell your wife.

 

[Luckyone]

Props to Luckyone, the only liberal democrat with balls to express their answers to straight-forward questions. Say luckyonce, come to the right side, just don't tell your wife.

I say that you stating that parking her car there was deliberate is pure misinformation.

I understand that is what Trump and his people want you to believe but I don't belive that is correct.

In looking at the video, her tires were pointed West, suggesting she was trying to cross the street going in the opposite direction of the ICE procession direction but she could not cross because they were upon her

here is what AI says

AI Overview

There is significant disagreement between federal authorities and local officials/eyewitnesses regarding whether Renee Good intentionally used her car to block or attack the ICE agents.

Federal Officials' Account

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other federal officials have stated that Good intentionally blocked the road and "weaponized her vehicle" to conduct an act of violence against the agents.

• Federal officials claim Good had been harassing law enforcement vehicles earlier in the day and intentionally returned to the scene to impede the operation by parking her car diagonally across the public roadway as a barrier.
• They describe her actions as "domestic terrorism" and assert the agent who shot her acted in self-defense, fearing for his life when the car moved toward him.

Local Officials' and Eyewitness Account

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, local officials, and eyewitnesses strongly dispute the federal claims.

• Video analysis by local officials and some news organizations suggests Good was attempting to leave the scene or maneuver away from the agents when she was shot, not trying to run them over.
• Eyewitnesses have stated that she stopped to let an unmarked ICE vehicle pass, and the agents then got out of their vehicle and approached her, escalating the situation.
• They argue the agent acted recklessly and that the use of lethal force was not justified.

In essence, federal authorities claim the blocking was intentional interference, while local accounts and video analysis suggest she was trying to leave or inadvertently stopped in the road due to the situation, making her car placement a point of significant contention in the ongoing investigation.

 

[Darlo kittu]

I say that you stating that parking her car there was deliberate is pure misinformation.

I understand that is what Trump and his people want you to believe but I don't belive that is correct.

In looking at the video, her tires were pointed West, suggesting she was trying to cross the street going in the opposite direction of the ICE procession direction but she could not cross because they were upon her

View attachment 1205986

here is what AI says

AI Overview

There is significant disagreement between federal authorities and local officials/eyewitnesses regarding whether Renee Good intentionally used her car to block or attack the ICE agents.

Federal Officials' Account

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other federal officials have stated that Good intentionally blocked the road and "weaponized her vehicle" to conduct an act of violence against the agents.

• Federal officials claim Good had been harassing law enforcement vehicles earlier in the day and intentionally returned to the scene to impede the operation by parking her car diagonally across the public roadway as a barrier.
• They describe her actions as "domestic terrorism" and assert the agent who shot her acted in self-defense, fearing for his life when the car moved toward him.

Local Officials' and Eyewitness Account

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, local officials, and eyewitnesses strongly dispute the federal claims.

• Video analysis by local officials and some news organizations suggests Good was attempting to leave the scene or maneuver away from the agents when she was shot, not trying to run them over.
• Eyewitnesses have stated that she stopped to let an unmarked ICE vehicle pass, and the agents then got out of their vehicle and approached her, escalating the situation.
• They argue the agent acted recklessly and that the use of lethal force was not justified.

In essence, federal authorities claim the blocking was intentional interference, while local accounts and video analysis suggest she was trying to leave or inadvertently stopped in the road due to the situation, making her car placement a point of significant contention in the ongoing investigation.

Misinformation is anything that tells the truth liberals are denying

 

[Billiejeens]

The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good during a January 7 encounter in Minneapolis suffered internal bleeding to the torso, two U.S. officials briefed on his condition told CBS News. The agent, identified as Jonathan Ross, was hospitalized following the shooting, the officials …

 

[Billiejeens]

I say that you stating that parking her car there was deliberate is pure misinformation.

I understand that is what Trump and his people want you to believe but I don't belive that is correct.

In looking at the video, her tires were pointed West, suggesting she was trying to cross the street going in the opposite direction of the ICE procession direction but she could not cross because they were upon her

View attachment 1205986

here is what AI says

AI Overview

There is significant disagreement between federal authorities and local officials/eyewitnesses regarding whether Renee Good intentionally used her car to block or attack the ICE agents.

Federal Officials' Account

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other federal officials have stated that Good intentionally blocked the road and "weaponized her vehicle" to conduct an act of violence against the agents.

• Federal officials claim Good had been harassing law enforcement vehicles earlier in the day and intentionally returned to the scene to impede the operation by parking her car diagonally across the public roadway as a barrier.
• They describe her actions as "domestic terrorism" and assert the agent who shot her acted in self-defense, fearing for his life when the car moved toward him.

Local Officials' and Eyewitness Account

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, local officials, and eyewitnesses strongly dispute the federal claims.

• Video analysis by local officials and some news organizations suggests Good was attempting to leave the scene or maneuver away from the agents when she was shot, not trying to run them over.
• Eyewitnesses have stated that she stopped to let an unmarked ICE vehicle pass, and the agents then got out of their vehicle and approached her, escalating the situation.
• They argue the agent acted recklessly and that the use of lethal force was not justified.

In essence, federal authorities claim the blocking was intentional interference, while local accounts and video analysis suggest she was trying to leave or inadvertently stopped in the road due to the situation, making her car placement a point of significant contention in the ongoing investigation.

You should seek medical help

You are insane.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The only thing that matters here:
Could a reasonable person, in the exact same setting as the ICE officer - that is, looking at the situation through their eyes - have a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm?
If the answer is yes, the shoot is good.