A few questions for the fundies

[RWNJ]

Ya, it says I know funny when I see it, they don't.

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Why do left wingers demand that religions perform same gender weddings?

Because they are evil.

 

[zaangalewa]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?
2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?
3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

You'll be fine. The religious nutballs are on the wrong side of history.

I heard this, Nazi. Do not think we sleep at Christmas.

Not scared. Literally all we have to do is sit here and watch the fundies drive away their kids and then die off.

Sure. And the sun is an iceberg - that's why we need a climate change.

 

[Taz]

Ya, it says I know funny when I see it, they don't.

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

 

[Taz]

Ya, it says I know funny when I see it, they don't.

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Why do left wingers demand that religions perform same gender weddings?

Religions are free to perform such weddings, or not.

 

[Correll]

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?
2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?
3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

You'll be fine. The religious nutballs are on the wrong side of history.

I heard this, Nazi. Do not think we sleep at Christmas.

Not scared. Literally all we have to do is sit here and watch the fundies drive away their kids and then die off.

Sure. And the sun is an iceberg - that's why we need a climate change.

Probability of fundamental religious nutball also being a climate denier = 100%

 

[Taz]

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

 

[Correll]

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

 

[Pop23]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?

Yes, you will be the answer to the $100 cash cab question: Who is the last gay dude pretending to be straight?

2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?

Yes, but only late night on showtime. And in our would you won't have to call him "wife" either.

OBTW, in our world freaky sex will be MANDATED, unless you want to pay a fine at the end of the year.

3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

Again, Yes, speaking about Long Guns, Bacon and Taco's will not only completely acceptable, but encouraged.

 

[Taz]

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

 

[Correll]

Got it, the lib thinks we have gone overboard on a type of freedom he does not like.



You want "freedom from religion"? Fine, go for it. Because you do NOT have it now. Right now we have Freedom OF religion.


the process for amending the constitution is plain.


All I ask is that you be honest about what you are doing.


Did you believe that Obama was a religious person?

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

Saying a society was built by religious people is not an argument for the merit or truth of goofy, bronze age religion. This society was also built by slavers and genocidal killers. Oh, and they took justification for their actions from the same religious text that thinks for you.

 

[Correll]

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

Saying a society was built by religious people is not an argument for the merit or truth of goofy, bronze age religion. This society was also built by slavers and genocidal killers. Oh, and they took justification for their actions from the same religious text that thinks for you.

That those people managed to build the technological marvel and wealth that is the modern world is an strong argument that they are not stupid or incompetent.

 

[RWNJ]

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

Saying a society was built by religious people is not an argument for the merit or truth of goofy, bronze age religion. This society was also built by slavers and genocidal killers. Oh, and they took justification for their actions from the same religious text that thinks for you.

That those people managed to build the technological marvel and wealth that is the modern world is an strong argument that they are not stupid or incompetent.

@Whoever wrote the following BS:

"Saying a society was built by religious people is not an argument for the merit or truth of goofy, bronze age religion. This society was also built by slavers and genocidal killers. Oh, and they took justification for their actions from the same religious text that thinks for you."

No Christian has ever used the Bible to support slavery or genocide. The ones who did that were the forerunners of modern day liberals. Christians are the ones who ENDED slavery in America. Now, Progressive liberal scum bags are trying to bring it back. They have a large percentage of the black population relying on the government to support their worthless, lazy asses, and have turned them into professional victims who believe that the white man is responsible for all of their woes. You are not fooling anyone but yourself, if you actually believe what you post. Personally, I think you know it's BS because you are one of those worthless, lazy scumbags sucking at the government titty. Sucks to be you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No Christian has ever used the Bible to support slavery or genocide. The ones who did that

This is the intelligence level of the apologists in this argument. I feel like a gorilla smacking around toddlers.

 

[Taz]

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

 

[zaangalewa]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?
2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?
3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

You'll be fine. The religious nutballs are on the wrong side of history.

I heard this, Nazi. Do not think we sleep at Christmas.

Not scared. Literally all we have to do is sit here and watch the fundies drive away their kids and then die off.

Sure. And the sun is an iceberg - that's why we need a climate change.

Probability of fundamental religious nutball also being a climate denier = 100%

I fear one of the worst mistakes in my life was it to learn the English language.

 

[zaangalewa]

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

 

[Correll]

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

 

[Taz]

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

After you learn to read English, because I'm right on point. So how many times have you read Mein Kampf? More than 100?