PatekPhilippe
Senior Member
First:
What is the opinion of board members here of this part of Obama's new Nuclear Posture Review concerning the use of nuclear weapons.
"Nuclear weapons will no longer be used in retaliation for a nuclear attack, chemical warfare attack or a biological weapons attack against the United States."
Does this remove a significant deterrent to Nations bent on aquiring WMD's and their using them against the United States?
Second:
It appears Obama has NOT cut ties to Robert Malley, his college chum and chief advocate of negotiating with terrorists without preconditions, as Malley has been negotiating with HAMAS behind the scenes. State Department official Rachel Schneller has met privately with HAMAS officials on numerous occasions!!! Even attending an Al Jazeera debate panel with HAMAS officials present.
Why does Obama insist on negotiating wth terrorists who refuse to renounce violence, refuse to acknowledge Israel's right to exist and abide by all previously signed agreements with Israel negotiaters?
What is the opinion of board members here of this part of Obama's new Nuclear Posture Review concerning the use of nuclear weapons.
"Nuclear weapons will no longer be used in retaliation for a nuclear attack, chemical warfare attack or a biological weapons attack against the United States."
Does this remove a significant deterrent to Nations bent on aquiring WMD's and their using them against the United States?
Second:
It appears Obama has NOT cut ties to Robert Malley, his college chum and chief advocate of negotiating with terrorists without preconditions, as Malley has been negotiating with HAMAS behind the scenes. State Department official Rachel Schneller has met privately with HAMAS officials on numerous occasions!!! Even attending an Al Jazeera debate panel with HAMAS officials present.
Why does Obama insist on negotiating wth terrorists who refuse to renounce violence, refuse to acknowledge Israel's right to exist and abide by all previously signed agreements with Israel negotiaters?