Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 15,711
- 27,665
- 2,430
Why Is the Western Media Ignoring the U.S. Role in Sudan?
Why Is the Western Media Ignoring the U.S. Role in Sudan? | The Gateway Pundit | by Larry Johnson
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Follow along with me now. This is not complicated. Russia reached a tentative agreement with the Government of Sudan to build a base for the Russian Navy on Sudan’s coast. Yet the media claims that Moscow is behind the current counter coup by the Rapid Security Force aka RSF, which is trying to replace the Government that reached the agreement with Russia. Not one word about the United States activities there. Here is one example:
Follow along with me now. This is not complicated. Russia reached a tentative agreement with the Government of Sudan to build a base for the Russian Navy on Sudan’s coast. Yet the media claims that Moscow is behind the current counter coup by the Rapid Security Force aka RSF, which is trying to replace the Government that reached the agreement with Russia. Not one word about the United States activities there. Here is one example:
Follow along with me now. This is not complicated. Russia reached a tentative agreement with the Government of Sudan to build a base for the Russian Navy on Sudan’s coast. Yet the media claims that Moscow is behind the current counter coup by the Rapid Security Force aka RSF, which is trying to replace the Government that reached the agreement with Russia. Not one word about the United States activities there. Here is one example:
The Russian mercenary group Wagner has been supplying the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group in fights against the Sudanese army, according to CNN.
Okay. Let us review some other key facts reported by the media:Sudan has been without a parliament since a popular uprising forced the military overthrow of longtime autocrat Omar al-Bashir in April 2019. The country has been mired in political chaos since an October 2021 military coup derailed its short-lived transition to democracy. 11 February 2023 — Sudan’s ruling military concluded a review of an agreement with Russia to build a navy base on the Red Sea in the African country, two Sudanese officials said Saturday. They said the deal was awaiting the formation of a civilian government and a legislative body to be ratified before it takes effect.
The agreement allows Russia to set up a naval base with up to 300 Russian troops, and to simultaneously keep up to four navy ships, including nuclear-powered ones, in the strategic Port Sudan on the Red Sea. The base would ensure the Russian navy’s presence in the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean and spare its ships the need for long voyages to reach the area, according to Viktor Bondarev, the former Russian air force chief.In exchange, Russia is to provide Sudan with weapons and military equipment. The agreement is to last for 25 years, with automatic extensions for 10-year periods if neither side objects.
22 February 2022 — Gen. Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, commander of the powerful paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, held talks with senior Russian officials in Moscow.
~Snip~Can you think of any countries in the world that might object to Sudan allowing Russia to construct a naval base on the shores of the Red Sea? Hmmmm. I can — the United States and the United Kingdom. Last September, newly arrived U.S. Ambassador to Sudan, John Godfrey, “warned Khartoum not to allow Russia to establish a naval base on its Red Sea coast, saying it would harm the country’s interests.“
General Dagalo, who visited Moscow in February, also happens to be the deputy chairman of Sudan’s Sovereign Council. As such, he represented the Government of Sudan in Moscow, not the RSF (i.e., Rapid Support Force).
~Snip~
Ambassador Godfrey clearly threatened Sudan with adverse “consequences” for cooperating with Russia. Is it in the realm of the possible that Ambassador Godfrey or the CIA Chief of Station offered the RSF some sweetheart deals if the RSF ousted the current Sudanese Government and promised to halt the plans for a Russian base? Why that would be meddling in the internal affairs of a foreign country. Right?
I am struck by the number of people working at the U.S. Embassy in Khartoum that may need to be rescued — the announced figure is 70. Why so large a presence? Note that the U.S. Embassy in Kiev has 71 persons, not counting the additional military personnel detailed to Ukraine. Sudan is not a major trading partner with the United States. What are those U.S. diplomats doing?
Could it have something to do with the civil war in Yemen? It has been widely reported that Sudan sided with the Government of Yemen against the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. According to the CIA World Factbook:
Commentary:
The western media do whatever the neo-Marxist/Maoist Democrats tell them.
Simply put, most of the Quisling Media spreads propaganda and this is just another CIA controlled operation. They are told what to cover and not to cover.
Trump negotiated a peace deal with Israel which Biden has clearly stated will not be allowed to proceed.
That's what this is mostly about.
Also, US & UK (CIA & MI6) people met with the Janjaweed (RSF) 2 days before they began the war and ordered them to attack.
President Trump's peace deals for and with Israel included Sudan, to the point of the leader of Sudan visiting Israel some months ago after meetings in Sudan...
Sudan quietly signs Abraham Accords weeks after Israel deal
Sudan on Wednesday quietly signed on to the Abraham Accords, U.S.-brokered agreements which have ushered in public rapprochements between Israel and several Arab states.
www.reuters.com
**********
US suspends Abraham Accords assistance to Sudan, urges Israel to call for democracy
Jerusalem has yet to comment on last year's coup, when the military seized power and arrested the prime minister
www.timesofisrael.com
