A coordinated, joint attack on the United States.

[odanny]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

 

[Meathead]

Brandon's legacy will surely be strategically uniting China and Russia and in doing so forming an axis which will cost the world dearly in the future.

It did not have to be that way.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

What's the point of attacking the USA when Biden and the democrat Party are spending us to Weimar Republic levels?

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” ― Sun Tzu

 

[Death-Ninja]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

China's navy would vanish from earth in one weeks time, their navy is not remotely capable of interdicting the United States anywhere, let alone conducting a blockade of any waterway, they barely have the capability to maintain that navy in their own territorial waters, and possess virtually no ability to project and maintain their navy anywhere else on earth! You have to be able to supply the navy you have, China possesses no more than 3-6 supply ships total, the United States has that many for each individual CSG!

 

[Confederate Soldier]

I highly doubt it.

China says they have the worlds largest navy, but that's if you count their canoes like they do. Americas navy clocks in at 3,415,893 tons, while China and Russia combined clock in at 1,554,625 tons. We got higher quality tanks and allies with high quality tanks, they don't. We got better planes, they don't. We have better helicopters, they don't. We have better position in the world, both literally and physically, they don't. We have the entire free world as a friend, they don't. The only thing they may have us beat by is nukes, but in the end does that matter?


They can whine, and bitch and bluff all they want, they're fucked in the end no matter what.

 

[Donald H]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

Coal oil is kerosene is what jet aircraft burn.

Watch for the provocation being on the part of America and on Iran on account of Iran's importance in Russia's war effort. Did that ring a bell for you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Coal oil is kerosene is what jet aircraft burn.

Watch for the provocation being on the part of America and on Iran on account of Iran's importance in Russia's war effort. Did that ring a bell for you?

You mean Obama handing Iran $150,000,000,000?

 

[Meathead]

China's navy would vanish from earth in one weeks time, their navy is not remotely capable of interdicting the United States anywhere, let alone conducting a blockade of any waterway, they barely have the capability to maintain that navy in their own territorial waters, and possess virtually no ability to project and maintain their navy anywhere else on earth! You have to be able to supply the navy you have, China possesses no more than 3-6 supply ships total, the United States has that many for each individual CSG!

At this time China is not capable of projecting naval power globally but with every passing year a blue-water navy becomes more of a reality.

As Napoleon once said, " When the Dragon wakes, the world will tremble."

 

[Donald H]

Let's call this for what it really is. An effort at our members fighting an armchair war against Russia and/or China for the sake of assuring themselves that America is still the most powerful military force on the face of the earth. And it is!

But that doesn't bring the calm and satisfaction our members are needed to find!

Russia has proven that they are not a small quickly and easily defeated nation. Russia has proven itself to be a world superpower that has managed to win a war against the combined might of the US and Nato countries.

This is due to America choosing the wrong fight at the wrong time, in the wrong country as it's proxy.

And then America's failure to be able to turn the Russian people against Putin and their military's objective.

And of top of that! Scott Ritter has the audacity to say that Russia has attained the capability out of fighting this war, to actually have the ability to defeat America in a conventional war.

That my friends, you have to hear to believe?

 

[night_son]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

Wherever a US Carrier Battle Group is not. That would be the best geographic locale to target. That being said, the same rules apply to directly provoking the US as do to provoking Russia or China. All three great powers are nuclear armed empires. Fucking around with atomic boom-boom no good. However, in a purely conventional war, Russia and China could inflict high casualties on both the US and NATO within a very short span of time. Full mobilization to both or either likely theaters of war would take months when Russia and China are already co-located near those areas. Something to consider.

 

[Donald H]

I highly doubt it.

China says they have the worlds largest navy, but that's if you count their canoes like they do. Americas navy clocks in at 3,415,893 tons, while China and Russia combined clock in at 1,554,625 tons. We got higher quality tanks and allies with high quality tanks, they don't. We got better planes, they don't. We have better helicopters, they don't. We have better position in the world, both literally and physically, they don't. We have the entire free world as a friend, they don't. The only thing they may have us beat by is nukes, but in the end does that matter?


They can whine, and bitch and bluff all they want, they're fucked in the end no matter what.

The nasty truth is that any of the two/three have the capability of eliminating a half to three quarters of a million tons of the enemy's navy in a heartbeat with ultrasonic missiles.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[Mac-7]

I'm posting this in the "Military" forum to discuss the military aspect, versus any political aspect, of such an event on the United States. By "coordinated, joint attack" it is simply Russia and China's planned, coordinated, and commenced at the same time type of plan for both countries to launch some kind of military attack jointly on either U.S. forces, or key U.S.assets, at their weakest points.

It could be a symbolic provocation of some sort that would not lead to the loss of lives or property, such as suddenly surrounding and "locking U.S. forces out" of an important, or just symbolic asset of the U.S..

Perhaps most likely to occur would be the closing of some navigable body of water somewhere by their navy. And this is much less likely from Russia, as their navy has been long neglected, many of their ships don't even run on diesel fuel, some coal oil mixture unique to them. They barely sail.

Where would these events, geographically, be most likely to occur? And what assets stand most vulnerable right now?

Perhaps its not a good idea to get specific on any location, a general area is fine, especially if you have knowledge of any particularly specific or sensitive locations.

It could happen along with attacks by Iran and north korea

But America has allies too as a deterrent

 

[Confederate Soldier]

The nasty truth is that any of the two/three have the capability of eliminating a half to three quarters of a million tons of the enemy's navy in a heartbeat with ultrasonic missiles.

Going by that logic, we can do the same, and they know it.

 

[Death-Ninja]

At this time China is not capable of projecting naval power globally but with every passing year a blue-water navy becomes more of a reality.

As Napoleon once said, " When the Dragon wakes, the world will tremble."

Nope, not gonna happen, even with the total or near total backing of America's traitorous industrial class, there is a very good reason for this, China is poised to demographically collapse within 10-30 years, and by collapse I mean utterly collapse, those decades of their one child policy has utterly doomed the Han Chinese, their working age population is already collapsing via aging out, their entire economy is dependent upon "importation," and in the event of any military hostilities with the west, they will be smothered by a United States backed naval blockade of biblical proportion, and they will be all but powerless to penetrate such a blockade!

 

[Votto]

Brandon's legacy will surely be strategically uniting China and Russia and in doing so forming an axis which will cost the world dearly in the future.

It did not have to be that way.

They are already in cahoots.

Putin secured a deal with Xi before invading the Ukraine, which guaranteed Xi's support.

Putin would have never gone it alone, and China wants to know how the world will react since they will invade Tiwan at some point.

 

[BlackSand]

.

All they need to do is send women and children across our Southern border ...
And with any luck, they will have us killing each other in the name of Humanity ...

.​

 

[occupied]

Let's call this for what it really is. An effort at our members fighting an armchair war against Russia and/or China for the sake of assuring themselves that America is still the most powerful military force on the face of the earth. And it is!

But that doesn't bring the calm and satisfaction our members are needed to find!

Russia has proven that they are not a small quickly and easily defeated nation. Russia has proven itself to be a world superpower that has managed to win a war against the combined might of the US and Nato countries.

This is due to America choosing the wrong fight at the wrong time, in the wrong country as it's proxy.

And then America's failure to be able to turn the Russian people against Putin and their military's objective.

And of top of that! Scott Ritter has the audacity to say that Russia has attained the capability out of fighting this war, to actually have the ability to defeat America in a conventional war.

That my friends, you have to hear to believe?

Bullshit. Russia is expending weapons without the industrial base to quickly replace losses. It's even worse with soldiers. Their population will never recover from sending an entire generation of men to their deaths in the worst run war in living memory.

 

[Unkotare]

Don't worry about it. China and Russia hate each other.

 

[ding]

Let's call this for what it really is. An effort at our members fighting an armchair war against Russia and/or China for the sake of assuring themselves that America is still the most powerful military force on the face of the earth. And it is!

But that doesn't bring the calm and satisfaction our members are needed to find!

Russia has proven that they are not a small quickly and easily defeated nation. Russia has proven itself to be a world superpower that has managed to win a war against the combined might of the US and Nato countries.

This is due to America choosing the wrong fight at the wrong time, in the wrong country as it's proxy.

And then America's failure to be able to turn the Russian people against Putin and their military's objective.

And of top of that! Scott Ritter has the audacity to say that Russia has attained the capability out of fighting this war, to actually have the ability to defeat America in a conventional war.

That my friends, you have to hear to believe?

You sound like a Russian sympathizer. That's not surprising at all to me.