Its about free will v the state, BBD.
Could have fooled me... At the time I thought it was a pretty violent movie with little or no social value. Guess I'm not as bright as you are. Thanks for making me aware of that!
The gratuitous violence served to make the individual's free will as ghastly as possible.
Alex was a selfish fucking nasty idiot.
The state he lived in was a socialistic nanny-state nightmare.
He rebelled against that state by being a violent thug. that was how he expressed his rights as an individual.
Remember how his former thug chums became policemen and then beat the crap out of him?
What do you suppose Burgess was telling the viewer (or reader) about his attitude about the state AND the individuals who comprise it?
Its a black book, folks. A deeply cynical view of the world.
Of course, I loved it.
It mirrors my own views about the constant battle between individual rights and the rights of the collective.\ to protect itself (and its members) from the rights of the individuals.