Did you just pull the picture of a random black man off the internet. You still haven't linked to any credible news story of this.
He's the suspect cutie pie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you just pull the picture of a random black man off the internet. You still haven't linked to any credible news story of this.
Again, spoken like a man who went to sleep last night with a full belly in a warm bed.
If you had to live on the street for a few weeks, we'd see how "uncivilized" you'd become, Cockroach.
Didn't Oregon go back to criminalizing street drugs?
![]()
Oregon law rolling back drug decriminalization takes effect, making possession a crime again
The new law taking effect Sunday, which passed with the support of Republican lawmakers who had long opposed decriminalization, makes possessing small amounts of hard drugs a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail.www.pbs.org
If it had been my wife, I'd want to kill the sumbitch.Wonder how you'd feel, if that had been your wife.
Wow, you don't understand the concept at all, do you?
She was convicted of stealing the diary.
But the diary would have no value again Biden himself because he can very well claim that someone added those passages.
Just like the Feds couldn't prove the Hunter tax case based on the fake laptop alone... they had to develop that evidence independently to get a case.

If it had been my wife, I'd want to kill the sumbitch.
But that's not the point, is it? The minute we make it about personal revenge, none of us are safe. There's always going to be that person who thinks he deserves a pound of your flesh.
This man SHOULD have been in a mental hospital getting treatment. Instead, we let him wander the streets and this woman paid the price.
There would be physical evidence of the addition. Here's a clue- watching CSI MIami does not make you a forensic science expert.
Except no one is defunding the police. Shit, Police budgets go up, they buy military grade equipment. If anything, the cops are overfunded, which is why when you have a call out, they bring six or seven cars.If the Democrats defund the police, then personal revenge will be the law of the land. That's why progressives are fools.
Except no one is defunding the police. Shit, Police budgets go up, they buy military grade equipment. If anything, the cops are overfunded, which is why when you have a call out, they bring six or seven cars.
sf.curbed.com
Kamala Harris praised ‘defund the police’ movement in June 2020 radio interview
I was thinking Law and Order... that if someone steals evidence, that you can't use that in a criminal prosecution at all.
In fact, the guy who established that was Alan Dershashitz, when he got Claus von Bulow's conviction thrown out because a PI found the supposed "evidence".
Chain of custody was broken when the druggie stole the diary and sold it to a third party. No evidentiary value.
Can you cite that legal principle's name?
The Exclusionary Rule stops the state from illegally seizing evidence.
Chain of custody refers to the control of evidence once the police have it.
Do you have a citation for your Bulow claim?
![]()
Rhode Island Supreme Court overturned Claus von Bülow's convictions 40 years ago
NBC 10's Jim Taricani interviewed the socialite at his New York apartment about the ruling.turnto10.com
Limitations on the exclusionary rule have included the following:
Private search doctrine: Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government officials.[31]
Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That source does not support your claim.
This source shows that you do not understand the Exclusionary Rule and perhaps have watched a little too much TV.
I have a pretty good grasp on it. No prosecutor would use a diary that a drug addict tried to sell for money as "evidence".
No. You do not.
You are a shining example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Guy, whatever, Quoting something that makes you think you sound smart doesn't make you smart.
A stolen journal stolen by a drug addict trying to make enough to get a fix is not something ANYONe would take seriously.
It's Ashley's diary. Why did she write that her father showered with her, when she was a little girl?
Doesn't that bother you? Has she denied it?