The knockout game

Again, spoken like a man who went to sleep last night with a full belly in a warm bed.

If you had to live on the street for a few weeks, we'd see how "uncivilized" you'd become, Cockroach.

Wonder how you'd feel, if that had been your wife.
 
Wonder how you'd feel, if that had been your wife.
If it had been my wife, I'd want to kill the sumbitch.

But that's not the point, is it? The minute we make it about personal revenge, none of us are safe. There's always going to be that person who thinks he deserves a pound of your flesh.

This man SHOULD have been in a mental hospital getting treatment. Instead, we let him wander the streets and this woman paid the price.
 
Wow, you don't understand the concept at all, do you?

She was convicted of stealing the diary.

But the diary would have no value again Biden himself because he can very well claim that someone added those passages.

Just like the Feds couldn't prove the Hunter tax case based on the fake laptop alone... they had to develop that evidence independently to get a case.

There would be physical evidence of the addition. Here's a clue- watching CSI MIami does not make you a forensic science expert. :auiqs.jpg:
 
If it had been my wife, I'd want to kill the sumbitch.

But that's not the point, is it? The minute we make it about personal revenge, none of us are safe. There's always going to be that person who thinks he deserves a pound of your flesh.

This man SHOULD have been in a mental hospital getting treatment. Instead, we let him wander the streets and this woman paid the price.

If the Democrats defund the police, then personal revenge will be the law of the land. That's why progressives are fools.
 
It's mostly a gang initiation. Kill a white person with a single punch and you are a solid dude.
 
There would be physical evidence of the addition. Here's a clue- watching CSI MIami does not make you a forensic science expert.

I was thinking Law and Order... that if someone steals evidence, that you can't use that in a criminal prosecution at all.

In fact, the guy who established that was Alan Dershashitz, when he got Claus von Bulow's conviction thrown out because a PI found the supposed "evidence".

Chain of custody was broken when the druggie stole the diary and sold it to a third party. No evidentiary value.
 
If the Democrats defund the police, then personal revenge will be the law of the land. That's why progressives are fools.
Except no one is defunding the police. Shit, Police budgets go up, they buy military grade equipment. If anything, the cops are overfunded, which is why when you have a call out, they bring six or seven cars.
 
Except no one is defunding the police. Shit, Police budgets go up, they buy military grade equipment. If anything, the cops are overfunded, which is why when you have a call out, they bring six or seven cars.










 
I was thinking Law and Order... that if someone steals evidence, that you can't use that in a criminal prosecution at all.

In fact, the guy who established that was Alan Dershashitz, when he got Claus von Bulow's conviction thrown out because a PI found the supposed "evidence".

Chain of custody was broken when the druggie stole the diary and sold it to a third party. No evidentiary value.

Can you cite that legal principle's name?


The Exclusionary Rule stops the state from illegally seizing evidence.

Chain of custody refers to the control of evidence once the police have it.

Do you have a citation for your Bulow claim?
 

That source does not support your claim.


This source shows that you do not understand the Exclusionary Rule and perhaps have watched a little too much TV.


Limitations on the exclusionary rule have included the following:

Private search doctrine: Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government officials.[31]

 
I have a pretty good grasp on it. No prosecutor would use a diary that a drug addict tried to sell for money as "evidence".

No. You do not.

You are a shining example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
15th post
Guy, whatever, Quoting something that makes you think you sound smart doesn't make you smart.

A stolen journal stolen by a drug addict trying to make enough to get a fix is not something ANYONe would take seriously.

It's Ashley's diary. Why did she write that her father showered with her, when she was a little girl?
Doesn't that bother you? Has she denied it?
 
It's Ashley's diary. Why did she write that her father showered with her, when she was a little girl?
Doesn't that bother you? Has she denied it?

It's Ashley's JOURNAL that wasn't in her possession.
I dnn't know if she wrote that or not.
I don't know if it's true if she did write it. (Part of this kind of therapy is getting addicts to blame their parents for everything, which is why so many of them end up using drugs again.)
I do know that Ashley has a good relationship with her father now.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom