Yurt
Gold Member
this belongs in the conspiracy section
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Um...Not so fast, Skippy.
Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists
Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?
Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.
The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.
Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?
UK Telegraph
Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com
Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend TridentÂ…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.
This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.
The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."
As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.
Non sequitur and red herring....CO2 isn't a pollutant and nobody is saying it's OK to pollute.Um...Not so fast, Skippy.
Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists
Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?
Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.
The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.
Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?
UK Telegraph
Well thank Xenu that proved that, now I can go back to polluting the planet consequence-free!
Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com
Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend TridentÂ…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.
This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.
The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."
As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.
Well thank Xenu that proved that, now I can go back to polluting the planet consequence-free!
Right...97% of "scientists" who've been involved with the IPCC.Damn Frankie!
97% of Scientists say you are full of shit...
But rightwingnuts still buy into your act
Really easy to get the results you want, when you fish in the pool that has the highest likelihood of giving you the responses you want to get, isn't it?
Didn't go through the link I posted in #2, didja?
Man made climate change is not real. Nobody with common sense believes in it anymore. Even the support from the Euro-weenies has dropped. Move on.
Typical Right Wing Response
Scientists may have numbers and stuff...but they lack "common sense"
No wonder so many apply the same term to Sarah Palin
Man made climate change is not real. Nobody with common sense believes in it anymore. Even the support from the Euro-weenies has dropped. Move on.
Typical Right Wing Response
Scientists may have numbers and stuff...but they lack "common sense"
No wonder so many apply the same term to Sarah Palin
The "science" has been poisoned, skewed, and corrupted or haven't you been paying attention for the past year. It was never about science; it has always been about politics. The UN would give anything to have the power to collect tax revenue from countries and that is essentially what this has always been about, global wealth redistribution.
Repeat after me: Global warming is real.
Global wealth redistribution. Holy shit the conspiracy goes even deeper than we thought.
The sample was taken from IPCC toadies....The linked piece demonstrates the trail to the purposefully skewed group that were polled.
Your poll and thread are towering fails.
Global wealth redistribution. Holy shit the conspiracy goes even deeper than we thought.
What the hell do you think the Kyoto Protocol was designed to do? China and India, developing countries, were allowed to pollute as much as they wanted. Only American and European pollution was evidently bad for the world. What does that result in? Ta-dah! International wealth redistribution, so there you go, genius.