94,610,000 Americans NOT in Labor Force...5.6% Unemployment Rate...WT#?

[pinqy]

They still do say it is 5.1%
Only the stupidest of the stupid think it is not now 5.1%

Only a Liberal Socialist President who has a pi$$-poor jobs creation record that has proven to have been falsified in the past

What on earth are you talking about?

and his blind followers can declare an unemployment rate that does not take into account 94,610,000 out of work Americans

The Unemployment Rate is a measure of how much available labor is not being used. Why would you want to include unavailable labor in that equation?

 

[jillian]

Jobs created during U.S. presidential terms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

yah... the geniuses forget that... and also forget who crashed the economy. amusing little trolls, aren't they?

 

[jknowgood]

dont forget the way the local governments are playing the numbers.
I just quit/retired from my job as a network engineer for a county in Maryland, I was working 8 to 12 hours a day with full benefits.
They filled that position with two people that break up the work day with two 5 hour shifts. This leaves them at a level that they dont work enough hours to be considered full time and do not get the full benefits to go along with the job.
Two people under employed but its a net gain of one job on the charts. It will no doubt go down as part of the jobs created statistics.

The only people playing the numbers are the Right!

The number working PT for economic reasons is going DOWN!
That's right, any increase in PT work is because people only want to work PT, not because they are forced to so greedy businessmen can avoid paying benefits.

The government forced businesses to provide those benefits. If they cannot afford it they have to do what they can. Obama did it so that is his fault.

 

[Siete]

People age 16 to 17, who likely are in high school: 9 million

• People who are enrolled in either two- or four-year colleges: 21 million

• People age 65 and older, who have reached retirement age: 40 million people

That means 20 million people are of normal working age, not in college and not working. That’s less than one-quarter the amount repeatedly cited BY RW DIPSHITS !!

next contestant ..

 

[edthecynic]

I take it back...Obama has a FINE jobs program that is working great!

Jobs up only for immigrants, +14,000, down 262,000 for 'native-borns'

"For a third month in a row, native-born Americans saw their job numbers tumble (as in 'decline') while immigrants experience solid gains. According to the montly Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers just released, "foreign-born" (as in 'illegals') jobs numbers increased by 14,000, while those for "native-born" Americans fell off a cliff (as in MASSIVELY 'DECLINE'), by 262,000."

(Don't you just hate those 'lying, anti-Obama racists' at the BoLS?!)

Bush had a high of 23,312,000 foreign workers up about 1 million from 22,356,000 in 2005 when they started keeping track on the number, there are 24,928,000 foreign workers now after more than 6 years, only about 1.6 million more than Bush"s high.

 

[edthecynic]

dont forget the way the local governments are playing the numbers.
I just quit/retired from my job as a network engineer for a county in Maryland, I was working 8 to 12 hours a day with full benefits.
They filled that position with two people that break up the work day with two 5 hour shifts. This leaves them at a level that they dont work enough hours to be considered full time and do not get the full benefits to go along with the job.
Two people under employed but its a net gain of one job on the charts. It will no doubt go down as part of the jobs created statistics.

The only people playing the numbers are the Right!

The number working PT for economic reasons is going DOWN!
That's right, any increase in PT work is because people only want to work PT, not because they are forced to so greedy businessmen can avoid paying benefits.

The government forced businesses to provide those benefits. If they cannot afford it they have to do what they can. Obama did it so that is his fault.

Again, the number working PT for economic reasons is DOWN.
Lying about businessmen greedily moving workers from FT to PT to save the cost of the benefits will not make it true. no matter how much you wish it was true and no matter how often you mindlessly parrot the lie.

 

[Siete]

mindless parrots ... what else do the RW's have left ?

 

[pinqy]

People age 16 to 17, who likely are in high school: 9 million

• People who are enrolled in either two- or four-year colleges: 21 million

• People age 65 and older, who have reached retirement age: 40 million people

That means 20 million people are of normal working age, not in college and not working. That’s less than one-quarter the amount repeatedly cited BY RW DIPSHITS !!

next contestant ..

Actually dat on students age 16-24 is at A-16. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 to 24 years of age by school enrollment, age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, and educational attainment

 

[easyt65]

Bush had....

Bu...bu...but BUSH!

Every time you start talking about the CURRENT President's record, Liberal always gotta jump in their lil' time machine, go back nearly a decade and bring up Bush....just to avoid talking about Obama!

 

[Timmy]

Should disabled people and stay at home moms count as "unemployed"?

 

[edthecynic]

Bush had....

Bu...bu...but BUSH!

Every time you start talking about the CURRENT President's record, Liberal always gotta jump in their lil' time machine, go back nearly a decade and bring up Bush....just to avoid talking about Obama!

Kinda like the Right bring up Carter, but that's OK when the Right do it!

 

[easyt65]

Kinda like the Right bring up Carter, but that's OK when the Right do it!

WHO the HAIL brings up CARTER?

The ONLY one who brings up Carter is OBAMA, and that's only to say, "Well, at least I am not as bad of a President as CARTER" ...at which point CARTER busts the hell out LAUGHING!

 

[jknowgood]

dont forget the way the local governments are playing the numbers.
I just quit/retired from my job as a network engineer for a county in Maryland, I was working 8 to 12 hours a day with full benefits.
They filled that position with two people that break up the work day with two 5 hour shifts. This leaves them at a level that they dont work enough hours to be considered full time and do not get the full benefits to go along with the job.
Two people under employed but its a net gain of one job on the charts. It will no doubt go down as part of the jobs created statistics.

The only people playing the numbers are the Right!

The number working PT for economic reasons is going DOWN!
That's right, any increase in PT work is because people only want to work PT, not because they are forced to so greedy businessmen can avoid paying benefits.

The government forced businesses to provide those benefits. If they cannot afford it they have to do what they can. Obama did it so that is his fault.

Again, the number working PT for economic reasons is DOWN.
Lying about businessmen greedily moving workers from FT to PT to save the cost of the benefits will not make it true. no matter how much you wish it was true and no matter how often you mindlessly parrot the lie.

No, because a small business pays their employees what they can afford. Then government comes in and makes them pay thousands in extra benefits. They can't afford it and have to make choices, that they don't like but have to. Thanks to government.

 

[jknowgood]

Bush had....

Bu...bu...but BUSH!

Every time you start talking about the CURRENT President's record, Liberal always gotta jump in their lil' time machine, go back nearly a decade and bring up Bush....just to avoid talking about Obama!

Kinda like the Right bring up Carter, but that's OK when the Right do it!

I bring up Carter, only to mention how pleased he is that how Obama took him off the worst president ever in history list.

 

[edthecynic]

No, because a small business pays their employees what they can afford. Then government comes in and makes them pay thousands in extra benefits. They can't afford it and have to make choices, that they don't like but have to. Thanks to government.

The Right can't have it both ways, claiming first that businesses are cutting hours to avoid paying benefits, and when that lie is exposed claiming that businessmen are forced by government to pay benefits.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

No, because a small business pays their employees what they can afford. Then government comes in and makes them pay thousands in extra benefits. They can't afford it and have to make choices, that they don't like but have to. Thanks to government.

The Right can't have it both ways, claiming first that businesses are cutting hours to avoid paying benefits, and when that lie is exposed claiming that businessmen are forced by government to pay benefits.

if the employee is full time then the government does force them to pay benefits, if the employee is part time those rules dont apply.
where are people trying to have it both ways.

 

[AceRothstein]

The OP is a dishonest clown.

 

[edthecynic]

Kinda like the Right bring up Carter, but that's OK when the Right do it!

WHO the HAIL brings up CARTER?

The ONLY one who brings up Carter is OBAMA, and that's only to say, "Well, at least I am not as bad of a President as CARTER" ...at which point CARTER busts the hell out LAUGHING!

still the biggest clown on that list is Jimmy Carter. Ford handed him over a pretty good economy and the moron blew it.
Truman and johnson had everybody fighting a war, that's why their numbers are low

Have to give Carter some credit, He burned the country down in only 4 yrs

 

[edthecynic]

dont forget the way the local governments are playing the numbers.
I just quit/retired from my job as a network engineer for a county in Maryland, I was working 8 to 12 hours a day with full benefits.
They filled that position with two people that break up the work day with two 5 hour shifts. This leaves them at a level that they dont work enough hours to be considered full time and do not get the full benefits to go along with the job.
Two people under employed but its a net gain of one job on the charts. It will no doubt go down as part of the jobs created statistics.

No, because a small business pays their employees what they can afford. Then government comes in and makes them pay thousands in extra benefits. They can't afford it and have to make choices, that they don't like but have to. Thanks to government.

The Right can't have it both ways, claiming first that businesses are cutting hours to avoid paying benefits, and when that lie is exposed claiming that businessmen are forced by government to pay benefits.

if the employee is full time then the government does force them to pay benefits, if the employee is part time those rules dont apply.
where are people trying to have it both ways.

The government does not force SMALL BUSINESS to pay benefits. The business must have more than 50 FT employees, and even then they can choose to pay a fine smaller than the cost of benefits.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Pretty soon we'll have 200 million out of work, unemployment will be 1 percent and everything will be wonderful. This is the kabuki theatre math we have going on right now.