911 FOX reports Flight 93 shot down by an F-16 from the US National Air Guard

[eots]

It also states fuel tanks contributed to the collapse contrary to nist

why would you post a video full of statements that are directly opposed to the nist findings ?...

Because they don't know anything and just parrot official conspiracy rhetoric, and when fatal flaws are pointed out they have no explanation, precisely because of the fact they know absolutely nothing.

speaking of projecting....

you should be fired you are getting awfully lax at your job...do you really think you are earning your pay with lame responses like this ?

 

[daws101]

Because they don't know anything and just parrot official conspiracy rhetoric, and when fatal flaws are pointed out they have no explanation, precisely because of the fact they know absolutely nothing.

speaking of projecting....

you should be fired you are getting awfully lax at your job...do you really think you are earning your pay with lame responses like this ?

inaccurate bullshit...

 

[daws101]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6fe9YlHQwA&feature=share&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg]9/11 Truthers: Meet the Scholars for 9/11 Truth - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eots]

Dwain Deets,
MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:




Bio: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov




Larry L. Erickson, MS, PhD

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:





David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist,

retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.
Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories], and 7 were brought down by explosives. [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

 

[daws101]

Dwain Deets,
MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:




Bio: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov




Larry L. Erickson, MS, PhD

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:





David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist,

retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.
Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories], and 7 were brought down by explosives. [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

A&e for twoof no credibility here !

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11/

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.

 

[SAYIT]

someone farted in here.

You're the only one in your mommy's basement, Princess, so it must have been you again.
Boy, when you're not fartin' or shittin' your chokin' your little chicken. Interesting life.

 

[daws101]

someone farted in here.

You're the only one in your mommy's basement, Princess, so it must have been you again.
Boy, when you're not fartin' or shittin' your chokin' your little chicken. Interesting life.

handjob has a sick fascination with all things anal...

 

[Rat in the Hat]

someone farted in here.

Based on posts like this, I am becoming completely convinced that 9/11 MUST have been an inside job.

Just imagine how many converts Dickie the Gage would get if he just walked up on stage with a sign saying and declared "someone farted in here". THE PETITION would have over 1,000,000 signatures in a matter of days.




Sent from my NWO ShillPhone using Mock-a-mope II

 

[wihosa]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

 

[Mr. Jones]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

 

[daws101]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

oh! now we're in on it and were sent here to quash your freedom of speech.
that means the mods and admin are in on it too...
btw sister jones you're out of toilet paper and the lock on your back door needs fixing...

 

[daws101]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

not the guys who live in caves nonsense again...

 

[wihosa]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

It really does seem that some of the nay Sayers are part of the coverup. Arguing in the face of obvious problems with the original "investigation". NIST made assertions, not conclusions.

Any nay sayers should at least have the courage of their conviction and check out the AE911 site.

 

[wihosa]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

not the guys who live in caves nonsense again...

You are right, the idea that some guys living in caves in Afghanistan could pull of 911 is clearly nonsense. I'm glad you are finally waking up!

 

[daws101]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

It really does seem that some of the nay Sayers are part of the coverup. Arguing in the face of obvious problems with the original "investigation". NIST made assertions, not conclusions.

Any nay sayers should at least have the courage of their conviction and check out the AE911 site.

ae 911 are the laughingstock of the construction and architectural world,most of it members are neither..

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

It really does seem that some of the nay Sayers are part of the coverup. Arguing in the face of obvious problems with the original "investigation". NIST made assertions, not conclusions.

Any nay sayers should at least have the courage of their conviction and check out the AE911 site.

I've tried reading the AE911 site, but I get bored reading all the begging for donations and signatures.

 

[daws101]

Once again, no real investigation.
How about all you who are so sure that some guys living in caves were able to completely outwit the worlds greatest intelligence agency, high jack planes, make U turns in the sky, crash them into the TT completely destroying them, crash one into the Pentagon (one of the most fortified buildings in the world) all while the worlds most powerful military inexplicably fails to respond and then hours later for the first time in history a forty seven story modern steel frame high rise building fails due to a moderate office fire... How about all of you who are so sure of that at least agree that the circumstances deserve a real investigation with a real prosecutor with real subpoena power?

What are you afraid of, you might be wrong?

not the guys who live in caves nonsense again...

You are right, the idea that some guys living in caves in Afghanistan could pull of 911 is clearly nonsense. I'm glad you are finally waking up!

typical twoofer misrepresentation.
since none of the hijackers ever lived in caves and bin laden was a billionaire...that makes your assumption false.
if anyone needs to wake up it 's you assclowns.

 

[daws101]

Shit, they know they're wrong, but they don't care. Most of these people are only here doing a shift. They don't care about the nation, or the lies, proof, evidence, witnesses,...all they care about is keeping people from learning, and stifling any discussion by using a number of tactics, including ridicule, and easily debunked strawmen.
9-11 was a false flag operation and a cover up using psyop tactics...

It really does seem that some of the nay Sayers are part of the coverup. Arguing in the face of obvious problems with the original "investigation". NIST made assertions, not conclusions.

Any nay sayers should at least have the courage of their conviction and check out the AE911 site.

I've tried reading the AE911 site, but I get bored reading all the begging for donations and signatures.

the last thing I need is another coffee cup.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

It really does seem that some of the nay Sayers are part of the coverup. Arguing in the face of obvious problems with the original "investigation". NIST made assertions, not conclusions.

Any nay sayers should at least have the courage of their conviction and check out the AE911 site.

I've tried reading the AE911 site, but I get bored reading all the begging for donations and signatures.

the last thing I need is another coffee cup.

I'm saving up to buy the handwritten copy of THE PETITION with all the signers personal autographs.




Sent on my cufflink phone using Shillapost IV