911 another stake through the heart of the official story huggers!

[Meathead]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

 

[daws101]

they were hit by your imaginary airplane that you saw live on tv.

if they were imaginary, then no cgi would have been necessary..
so in reality they would have had to have been either projected cgi images of real air planes or real air planes.not imaginary

easy.

not one of those clips could you walk into court as a fact witness and claim you saw a plane impact the building. EVEN if you were the one who filmed it. you would be out on your ass 3 seconds after you opened your flap trap and I know for a fact you have no clue why.

bullshit...the clips are evidence of what was seen live...
and are admissible as evidence.
again you're misinterpreting the law...

 

[daws101]

you arent making any sense the bbc probly got it from rueters I forget

I'm seeing a pattern here, the twoofer again avoided the question.

Are you saying that Reuters were in on it now? Because they really needed to know? Were the BBC in on it, or was it just a mistake with all the confusion?

Useless twoofer is useless.

I am saying what I said nothing more nothing less.
reuters is a primary news feed for all the networks
what do you want me to do draw up a conspiracy theory for you? LOL
isnt it enough those planes are fake?

bullshit! Reuters is just one tiny news source, used by the networks for international news.
why the fuck would all the over the air and cable networks use them for an event that happened on their doorstep?
answer: they did not.
more smoking gun proof of your ignorance and mental illness.

 

[Rebelitarian]

Loose Change Final Cut

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU48jWXYyeA]Loose Change Final Cut Full Length.flv - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

easy.

not one of those clips could you walk into court as a fact witness and claim you saw a plane impact the building. EVEN if you were the one who filmed it. you would be out on your ass 3 seconds after you opened your flap trap and I know for a fact you have no clue why.

Ha ha...and how do you think your lunacy would hold up "in court".

It wouldn't even get to court...straight into the fucking asylum you go.

well enough to watch you get booted

is this a real plane? yes or no?

missing wings missing tail stretch front LOL

real yes or no?

only a nut job like you would try to pass that off as evidence...yes YOU WOULD GET BOOTED OUT OF COURT FOR THAT AMATEURISH SHIT.
ON THE OTHER HAND THIS: [ame=http://youtu.be/eo0IdOn2joA]9/11 Naudet WTC1 Strike Plus Aftermath HD - YouTube[/ame] IS ACTUAL NON DEBATABLE EVIDENCE taped live as it happened...the time code proves it..

 

[daws101]

Loose Change Final Cut

Loose Change Final Cut Full Length.flv - YouTube

 

[Montrovant]

they were hit by your imaginary airplane that you saw live on tv.

if they were imaginary, then no cgi would have been necessary..
so in reality they would have had to have been either projected cgi images of real air planes or real air planes.not imaginary

easy.

not one of those clips could you walk into court as a fact witness and claim you saw a plane impact the building. EVEN if you were the one who filmed it. you would be out on your ass 3 seconds after you opened your flap trap and I know for a fact you have no clue why.

Wait, if you witness something happen you cannot be a witness?

Or are you saying the act of filming somehow invalidates what a person sees?

 

[daws101]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

it's cheap entertainment!

 

[daws101]

if they were imaginary, then no cgi would have been necessary..
so in reality they would have had to have been either projected cgi images of real air planes or real air planes.not imaginary

easy.

not one of those clips could you walk into court as a fact witness and claim you saw a plane impact the building. EVEN if you were the one who filmed it. you would be out on your ass 3 seconds after you opened your flap trap and I know for a fact you have no clue why.

Wait, if you witness something happen you cannot be a witness?

Or are you saying the act of filming somehow invalidates what a person sees?

sure when you film something you're taking away a piece of it's soul!

 

[Roudy]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

Yes, we're bored. The thread makes us laugh.

 

[KokomoJojo]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

they believe what they are told to believe because they have dysfunctional reasoning abilities and at some point they aways have to pay the piper.



Psychologists Say: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ SANE, Government Dupes CRAZY and Hostile.

Laurie Manwell, Univ of Guelph; users of the [CT], “Conspiracy Theorist” label impedes their cognitive function, published in American Behavioral Scientist 2010; anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing beliefs.

Univ of Buffalo Prof Steven Hoffman; anti-conspiracy people prone to “confirmation bias”, and pre-existing belief confirmation, using irrational mechanisms (such as the “CT” label) to avoid personal conflict.

Extreme irrationality of those who attack “CT's” is exposed by Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State Univ. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: CTst as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.

Now pro-conspiracy voices are more numerous and rational than anti-conspiracy ones and anti-CT people are like hostile, paranoid cranks.




So much butt hurt

 

[KokomoJojo]

Ha ha...and how do you think your lunacy would hold up "in court".

It wouldn't even get to court...straight into the fucking asylum you go.

well enough to watch you get booted

is this a real plane? yes or no?

missing wings missing tail stretch front LOL

real yes or no?

only a nut job like you would try to pass that off as evidence...yes YOU WOULD GET BOOTED OUT OF COURT FOR THAT AMATEURISH SHIT.
ON THE OTHER HAND THIS: [ame="http://youtu.be/eo0IdOn2joA"]9/11 Naudet WTC1 Strike Plus Aftermath HD - YouTube[/ame] IS ACTUAL NON DEBATABLE EVIDENCE taped live as it happened...the time code proves it..

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

 

[Roudy]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

they believe what they are told to believe because they have dysfunctional reasoning abilities and at some point they aways have to pay the piper.



Psychologists Say: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ SANE, Government Dupes CRAZY and Hostile.

Laurie Manwell, Univ of Guelph; users of the [CT], “Conspiracy Theorist” label impedes their cognitive function, published in American Behavioral Scientist 2010; anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing beliefs.

Univ of Buffalo Prof Steven Hoffman; anti-conspiracy people prone to “confirmation bias”, and pre-existing belief confirmation, using irrational mechanisms (such as the “CT” label) to avoid personal conflict.

Extreme irrationality of those who attack “CT's” is exposed by Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State Univ. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: CTst as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.

Now pro-conspiracy voices are more numerous and rational than anti-conspiracy ones and anti-CT people are like hostile, paranoid cranks.




So much butt hurt

The hills are alive with all the stupid irrelevant answers you've given when faced with the truth. I agree.

 

[Roudy]

well enough to watch you get booted

is this a real plane? yes or no?

missing wings missing tail stretch front LOL

real yes or no?

only a nut job like you would try to pass that off as evidence...yes YOU WOULD GET BOOTED OUT OF COURT FOR THAT AMATEURISH SHIT.
ON THE OTHER HAND THIS: [ame="http://youtu.be/eo0IdOn2joA"]9/11 Naudet WTC1 Strike Plus Aftermath HD - YouTube[/ame] IS ACTUAL NON DEBATABLE EVIDENCE taped live as it happened...the time code proves it..

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

Another asinine gif. We show actual footage shot live and this idiot shows animated gifs. Oh, did I tell you he thinks his animated gifs cancel out two missing airplanes and dead passengers with grieving families, hundreds of live camera shots and live witnesses on the ground?

 

[KokomoJojo]

only a nut job like you would try to pass that off as evidence...yes YOU WOULD GET BOOTED OUT OF COURT FOR THAT AMATEURISH SHIT.
ON THE OTHER HAND THIS: 9/11 Naudet WTC1 Strike Plus Aftermath HD - YouTube IS ACTUAL NON DEBATABLE EVIDENCE taped live as it happened...the time code proves it..

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

Another asinine gif. We show actual footage shot live and this idiot shows animated gifs. Oh, did I tell you he thinks his animated gifs cancel out two missing airplanes and dead passengers with grieving families, hundreds of live camera shots and live witnesses on the ground?

play that pity card, when all else fails MORE DRAMA PLEASE, and 800 thousand babies starving and 6 million people dying.

so when you cant prove which one is fake and which one is real then grasp for anything you think can float your titanic.

But you still are saddled with proving the gray one is real when we know for a fact the red one is not and it looks idenitical and was made on 10 minutes.

That said its extremely easy to prove the red one is fake, therefore the gray one is what? fake or real?

we are talking about proving a plane here which needs to go no further than the video clips shown to us.


The planes have not been determined to be real, you keep dodging that.

In fact they look patently fake since the fake plane looks flawlessly like it.

so millions of people witnessed a cgi plane huh?

How did they pull that off?

some kind of mass hullucination?

 

[Montrovant]

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

Another asinine gif. We show actual footage shot live and this idiot shows animated gifs. Oh, did I tell you he thinks his animated gifs cancel out two missing airplanes and dead passengers with grieving families, hundreds of live camera shots and live witnesses on the ground?

play that pity card, when all else fails MORE DRAMA PLEASE, and 800 thousand babies starving and 6 million people dying.

so when you cant prove which one is fake and which one is real then grasp for anything you think can float your titanic.

But you still are saddled with proving the gray one is real when we know for a fact the red one is not and it looks idenitical and was made on 10 minutes.

That said its extremely easy to prove the red one is fake, therefore the gray one is what? fake or real?

we are talking about proving a plane here which needs to go no further than the video clips shown to us.


The planes have not been determined to be real, you keep dodging that.

In fact they look patently fake since the fake plane looks flawlessly like it.

so millions of people witnessed a cgi plane huh?

How did they pull that off?

some kind of mass hullucination?

Why would anyone try to prove anything about your ridiculous fuzzy gif?

 

[daws101]

I am curious about those who bother responding to this. Is there something seriously wrong with you?

they believe what they are told to believe because they have dysfunctional reasoning abilities and at some point they aways have to pay the piper.



Psychologists Say: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ SANE, Government Dupes CRAZY and Hostile.

Laurie Manwell, Univ of Guelph; users of the [CT], “Conspiracy Theorist” label impedes their cognitive function, published in American Behavioral Scientist 2010; anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing beliefs.

Univ of Buffalo Prof Steven Hoffman; anti-conspiracy people prone to “confirmation bias”, and pre-existing belief confirmation, using irrational mechanisms (such as the “CT” label) to avoid personal conflict.

Extreme irrationality of those who attack “CT's” is exposed by Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State Univ. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: CTst as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.

Now pro-conspiracy voices are more numerous and rational than anti-conspiracy ones and anti-CT people are like hostile, paranoid cranks.




So much butt hurt

this coming from the guy who puts the "T" in tard and the "D"in dysfunctional...

 

[daws101]

well enough to watch you get booted

is this a real plane? yes or no?

missing wings missing tail stretch front LOL

real yes or no?

only a nut job like you would try to pass that off as evidence...yes YOU WOULD GET BOOTED OUT OF COURT FOR THAT AMATEURISH SHIT.
ON THE OTHER HAND THIS: [ame="http://youtu.be/eo0IdOn2joA"]9/11 Naudet WTC1 Strike Plus Aftermath HD - YouTube[/ame] IS ACTUAL NON DEBATABLE EVIDENCE taped live as it happened...the time code proves it..

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

asked and answered.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Another asinine gif. We show actual footage shot live and this idiot shows animated gifs. Oh, did I tell you he thinks his animated gifs cancel out two missing airplanes and dead passengers with grieving families, hundreds of live camera shots and live witnesses on the ground?

play that pity card, when all else fails MORE DRAMA PLEASE, and 800 thousand babies starving and 6 million people dying.

so when you cant prove which one is fake and which one is real then grasp for anything you think can float your titanic.

But you still are saddled with proving the gray one is real when we know for a fact the red one is not and it looks idenitical and was made on 10 minutes.

That said its extremely easy to prove the red one is fake, therefore the gray one is what? fake or real?

we are talking about proving a plane here which needs to go no further than the video clips shown to us.


The planes have not been determined to be real, you keep dodging that.

In fact they look patently fake since the fake plane looks flawlessly like it.

so millions of people witnessed a cgi plane huh?

How did they pull that off?

some kind of mass hullucination?

Why would anyone try to prove anything about your ridiculous fuzzy gif?

um because they are frames from the video you believe proves a plane impacted the building. Unless you have nice juicy clear ones? Its all we the public have to work with. If you wouldnt modify them and add planes they wouldnt be so fuzzy.


is this a real plane? yes or no?

prove yours is real and the red one is fake

 

[daws101]

prove yours is rreal and the red one is fake

Another asinine gif. We show actual footage shot live and this idiot shows animated gifs. Oh, did I tell you he thinks his animated gifs cancel out two missing airplanes and dead passengers with grieving families, hundreds of live camera shots and live witnesses on the ground?

play that pity card, when all else fails MORE DRAMA PLEASE, and 800 thousand babies starving and 6 million people dying.

so when you cant prove which one is fake and which one is real then grasp for anything you think can float your titanic.

But you still are saddled with proving the gray one is real when we know for a fact the red one is not and it looks idenitical and was made on 10 minutes.

That said its extremely easy to prove the red one is fake, therefore the gray one is what? fake or real?

we are talking about proving a plane here which needs to go no further than the video clips shown to us.


The planes have not been determined to be real, you keep dodging that.

In fact they look patently fake since the fake plane looks flawlessly like it.

so millions of people witnessed a cgi plane huh?

How did they pull that off?

some kind of mass hullucination?

the hallucinations are all yours.

The planes have not been determined to be real,-koko7
the above statement proves mental illness!