I notice no one has anything to say about the youtube video showing the false claim of free fall......
As expected....
14.75 seconds according to your video. I've driven my 1994 Mustang GT when she was stock, down the 1/4 mile in 14.52 seconds with nothing but air as resistance. The WTC were massive and had plenty of resistence to give.
BTW you made sure to include someone who happens to NOT be scientist or a physics expert like NIST is supposed to be consisted of. Nice strawman there gump.
Let's assume your reasoning that the 9-11 commission report is correct t like you claim it is..
In the report they mention that the towers came down in about 10 seconds...Look it up yourself.
10 seconds is closer to freefall then 14.75, so you just proved by yourself the commission is wrong in this instance.

You further do not understand that the towers should have taken closer to 1 minute to fully collapse rather then 9.22 which is free fall, or 14.75.
All of that steel structure, you know the part of the hirise that is built with thicker more robust steel at the bottoms...Did not provide any resistance to the collapsing wall.NIST even mentions this but doesn't even think about explaining.. Why not?
And how the hell is the inner core going to just disintegrate and poof away into a cloud of dust, and dissapear? Jet fuel fires certainly can't do that. As a matter of fact nano thermite can't either. So what do you think can bring down such a massive steel hirise, 1250 feet tall, in a time span that is ..according to your video possibly only 4-5 seconds LESS then a free fall collapse? Of course the video is less then scientific and accurate but still way faster then should be physically expected.
Keep in mind that this happened to BOTH towers, and then again albeit in a different manner to WTC 7 that DID experience free fall, and free fall acceleration..
Your video tries to show that -1) Rosie Donnell is no physics expert but still smarter then you . 2) the tower came down just a little bit short of free fall speed. 3) the massive inner core disintegrated into a fine dust that glorified kerosene could not possibly have been hot enough to achieve.
So now we need to try to figure out and explain what the hell made the massive core disintegrate?
And how such a massive hirise could fall so fast, the same way, on 2 occasions in the same day?
What ever caused these things to be destroyed, it for sure was NOT jet fuel kerosene, and this should be enough proof that something else, that we may not totally understand yet, was involved.
It matters not how it was planted, or how it all was facilitated, who kept quiet etc.. the fact remains this mystery is not best explained by jet fuel fires, and this has been my point all along.
Here's another video showing the dissapearing parts of the building from another angle.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI]9/11 WTC North Tower Core, HAVE YOU SEEN IT? - YouTube[/ame]