Some of that is correct.
The rest of it is bullshit spewing from morons.
There were WAY too many indicators that pointed to Bush being the inside terrorist here.
There were WAY too many private journalists that spoke with a LOT of White House interns
that all said the same thing.....Bush was behind it. Too many notices left around his office(s) that
other people were privy to that confirmed what these interns claimed.
And kind of interesting, that ALL of these notes, witnesses, and interns suddenly "disappeared" a few days after their findings were published.
Jet fuel burns at around 410 degrees. Metals such as steel and iron start burning and melting around 1500 degrees. Jet fuel also does not cause explosions such as what destroyed these buildings.
Bush was in fact, a worm for the Dems, as he is butt-buddies with the Clintons....who turned the entire DNC into their private mafia organization in 1993.
410degrees F is towards the low end of ignition for jet fuel, which is chemically very close to kerosene. The following excerpt is from one of many similar pages on the internet, but I choose this because it's more to the point. EXCERPT:
"
Jet fuel burns at temperatures between 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Designed specifically for use with gas-turbine engines, jet fuel is available in three varieties: Jet A, Jet A-1 and Jet B. The latter is used for improved cold-weather performance.
The flash point of both Jet A and Jet A-1, the two most commonly used fuels for commercial aviation, is 100 F. They both have an autoignition temperature of 473 F.
Jet A is usually found only in the United States, and the rest of the world uses Jet A-1. The main difference between the two jet fuels is that A-1 freezes at a lower temperature. They are both kerosene-type jet fuels. "
...
Jet fuel burns at temperatures between 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Designed specifically for use with gas-turbine engines, jet fuel is available in three varieties: Jet A, Jet A-1 and Jet B. The latter is used for improved cold-weather performance.
www.reference.com
There are a few other factors many fail to know or appreciate regards the explosions and fires in the towers;
1) Most modern commercial aircraft such as those used in the Sept. 11,2001 attacks have a significant portion of the material used in their construction being composites = plastics = made from petroleum. While framework and struts/spars, etc. are often metal, mostly aluminum; much of the exterior skin tends to be composites, mostly of carbon fiber with petroleum based resins(plastics) as the bonding agent. Interiors also have a large number of petroleum based synthetics for things such as carpet, seating and the stowage bins overhead which are usually made from fiberglass composites.
Bottom-line is that your modern airliner is almost as much plastic as your scale model kit of such and all these composites/plastics will burn when enough heat and flame is provided ~ such as an impact and explosion event that sets off huge combustions.
2) The interiors of most modern offices also have a mix of synthetic and "plastic" materials, along with some wood products, which collectively can add more fuel to a fire once such gets going.
3) The disintegration of impact when the aircraft crashed into the towers causes rapid fuel dispersal much like what would result with a Fuel-Air-Explosive type bomb, hence the jet fuel explosions looking like the fireballs they were.
4) All the above means that there was enough fuel load for the fires in addition to "just" the jet fuel to produce heat in the range of 1500 degrees F (+/-), sufficient to soften the steel support structure of the towers.
5) Most of the structural steel support of the towers was the lattice framework of the exteriors. The flooring was basically slab construct anchored to the exterior lattice framing for the majority of support. Once a portion of the exterior steel had been heated enough to soften and bend from stress loads of wight above, the bowing outward would undo the anchoring of the floors, allowing them to fall downward. Also, the support for the upper stories not involved in flame would be lost, allowing them to fall downward. Collectively you have the upper structure and the detached floors falling downward, with increasing mass and energy setting off a pancaking effect causing the interior to drop at accelerating pace and the outer lattice of steel support to start peeling away like a banana skin.
6) All the buildings of the Trade Center shared a common basement and foundation structure, such that when the two Towers feel/collapsed, the weakened the foundation of others and this is why #7 also collapsed inward.
7) The Towers were built just before the personal computers boom happened and hence lacked the electrical wiring, transformers, and other equipment need for the modern offices of the 1980-1990s. There was constant interior upgrade bringing in electrical wiring, transformers, etc. and was some of the electrical transformers that caused the secondary explosions heard before the collapse as well as during the collapse.
8) Most commercial airliners are painted a dull to flat gray on the undersides, and both the 757 and 767 used in the attacks are twin jumbo jet engine aircraft. Their altitude above the ground witnesses, the early morning light angles, and the likelyhood of few of those observers knowing much about "military" aircraft of similar size and construct is part of what has lead to some mis-information and confusion as to what type of aircraft were involved.
FWIW - I spent most of 1996-2007 working for a major aircraft component sub-contrator making parts for both these aircraft. Both exterior and interior parts.
all of what you said has debunked in these two videos here.
You nailed it my friend.
