What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

9/11....20 years of lies.

OP
Angelo

Angelo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
31,000
Reaction score
15,482
Points
1,915
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
 

MisterBeale

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
32,485
Reaction score
14,311
Points
1,590

9/11 - THE FOOTAGE THEY DIDN'T LET YOU SEE TWICE (9/11 2001 Documentary)​

 

Stryder50

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2021
Messages
999
Reaction score
610
Points
873
Location
Lynden, WA, USA
Some of that is correct.
The rest of it is bullshit spewing from morons.

There were WAY too many indicators that pointed to Bush being the inside terrorist here.
There were WAY too many private journalists that spoke with a LOT of White House interns
that all said the same thing.....Bush was behind it. Too many notices left around his office(s) that
other people were privy to that confirmed what these interns claimed.

And kind of interesting, that ALL of these notes, witnesses, and interns suddenly "disappeared" a few days after their findings were published.

Jet fuel burns at around 410 degrees. Metals such as steel and iron start burning and melting around 1500 degrees. Jet fuel also does not cause explosions such as what destroyed these buildings.

Bush was in fact, a worm for the Dems, as he is butt-buddies with the Clintons....who turned the entire DNC into their private mafia organization in 1993.
410degrees F is towards the low end of ignition for jet fuel, which is chemically very close to kerosene. The following excerpt is from one of many similar pages on the internet, but I choose this because it's more to the point. EXCERPT:
"Jet fuel burns at temperatures between 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Designed specifically for use with gas-turbine engines, jet fuel is available in three varieties: Jet A, Jet A-1 and Jet B. The latter is used for improved cold-weather performance.

The flash point of both Jet A and Jet A-1, the two most commonly used fuels for commercial aviation, is 100 F. They both have an autoignition temperature of 473 F.

Jet A is usually found only in the United States, and the rest of the world uses Jet A-1. The main difference between the two jet fuels is that A-1 freezes at a lower temperature. They are both kerosene-type jet fuels. "
...

There are a few other factors many fail to know or appreciate regards the explosions and fires in the towers;
1) Most modern commercial aircraft such as those used in the Sept. 11,2001 attacks have a significant portion of the material used in their construction being composites = plastics = made from petroleum. While framework and struts/spars, etc. are often metal, mostly aluminum; much of the exterior skin tends to be composites, mostly of carbon fiber with petroleum based resins(plastics) as the bonding agent. Interiors also have a large number of petroleum based synthetics for things such as carpet, seating and the stowage bins overhead which are usually made from fiberglass composites.

Bottom-line is that your modern airliner is almost as much plastic as your scale model kit of such and all these composites/plastics will burn when enough heat and flame is provided ~ such as an impact and explosion event that sets off huge combustions.

2) The interiors of most modern offices also have a mix of synthetic and "plastic" materials, along with some wood products, which collectively can add more fuel to a fire once such gets going.

3) The disintegration of impact when the aircraft crashed into the towers causes rapid fuel dispersal much like what would result with a Fuel-Air-Explosive type bomb, hence the jet fuel explosions looking like the fireballs they were.

4) All the above means that there was enough fuel load for the fires in addition to "just" the jet fuel to produce heat in the range of 1500 degrees F (+/-), sufficient to soften the steel support structure of the towers.

5) Most of the structural steel support of the towers was the lattice framework of the exteriors. The flooring was basically slab construct anchored to the exterior lattice framing for the majority of support. Once a portion of the exterior steel had been heated enough to soften and bend from stress loads of wight above, the bowing outward would undo the anchoring of the floors, allowing them to fall downward. Also, the support for the upper stories not involved in flame would be lost, allowing them to fall downward. Collectively you have the upper structure and the detached floors falling downward, with increasing mass and energy setting off a pancaking effect causing the interior to drop at accelerating pace and the outer lattice of steel support to start peeling away like a banana skin.

6) All the buildings of the Trade Center shared a common basement and foundation structure, such that when the two Towers feel/collapsed, the weakened the foundation of others and this is why #7 also collapsed inward.

7) The Towers were built just before the personal computers boom happened and hence lacked the electrical wiring, transformers, and other equipment need for the modern offices of the 1980-1990s. There was constant interior upgrade bringing in electrical wiring, transformers, etc. and was some of the electrical transformers that caused the secondary explosions heard before the collapse as well as during the collapse.

8) Most commercial airliners are painted a dull to flat gray on the undersides, and both the 757 and 767 used in the attacks are twin jumbo jet engine aircraft. Their altitude above the ground witnesses, the early morning light angles, and the likelyhood of few of those observers knowing much about "military" aircraft of similar size and construct is part of what has lead to some mis-information and confusion as to what type of aircraft were involved.

FWIW - I spent most of 1996-2007 working for a major aircraft component sub-contrator making parts for both these aircraft. Both exterior and interior parts.
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
9,515
Points
2,030
Some of that is correct.
The rest of it is bullshit spewing from morons.

There were WAY too many indicators that pointed to Bush being the inside terrorist here.
There were WAY too many private journalists that spoke with a LOT of White House interns
that all said the same thing.....Bush was behind it. Too many notices left around his office(s) that
other people were privy to that confirmed what these interns claimed.

And kind of interesting, that ALL of these notes, witnesses, and interns suddenly "disappeared" a few days after their findings were published.

Jet fuel burns at around 410 degrees. Metals such as steel and iron start burning and melting around 1500 degrees. Jet fuel also does not cause explosions such as what destroyed these buildings.

Bush was in fact, a worm for the Dems, as he is butt-buddies with the Clintons....who turned the entire DNC into their private mafia organization in 1993.
410degrees F is towards the low end of ignition for jet fuel, which is chemically very close to kerosene. The following excerpt is from one of many similar pages on the internet, but I choose this because it's more to the point. EXCERPT:
"Jet fuel burns at temperatures between 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Designed specifically for use with gas-turbine engines, jet fuel is available in three varieties: Jet A, Jet A-1 and Jet B. The latter is used for improved cold-weather performance.

The flash point of both Jet A and Jet A-1, the two most commonly used fuels for commercial aviation, is 100 F. They both have an autoignition temperature of 473 F.

Jet A is usually found only in the United States, and the rest of the world uses Jet A-1. The main difference between the two jet fuels is that A-1 freezes at a lower temperature. They are both kerosene-type jet fuels. "
...

There are a few other factors many fail to know or appreciate regards the explosions and fires in the towers;
1) Most modern commercial aircraft such as those used in the Sept. 11,2001 attacks have a significant portion of the material used in their construction being composites = plastics = made from petroleum. While framework and struts/spars, etc. are often metal, mostly aluminum; much of the exterior skin tends to be composites, mostly of carbon fiber with petroleum based resins(plastics) as the bonding agent. Interiors also have a large number of petroleum based synthetics for things such as carpet, seating and the stowage bins overhead which are usually made from fiberglass composites.

Bottom-line is that your modern airliner is almost as much plastic as your scale model kit of such and all these composites/plastics will burn when enough heat and flame is provided ~ such as an impact and explosion event that sets off huge combustions.

2) The interiors of most modern offices also have a mix of synthetic and "plastic" materials, along with some wood products, which collectively can add more fuel to a fire once such gets going.

3) The disintegration of impact when the aircraft crashed into the towers causes rapid fuel dispersal much like what would result with a Fuel-Air-Explosive type bomb, hence the jet fuel explosions looking like the fireballs they were.

4) All the above means that there was enough fuel load for the fires in addition to "just" the jet fuel to produce heat in the range of 1500 degrees F (+/-), sufficient to soften the steel support structure of the towers.

5) Most of the structural steel support of the towers was the lattice framework of the exteriors. The flooring was basically slab construct anchored to the exterior lattice framing for the majority of support. Once a portion of the exterior steel had been heated enough to soften and bend from stress loads of wight above, the bowing outward would undo the anchoring of the floors, allowing them to fall downward. Also, the support for the upper stories not involved in flame would be lost, allowing them to fall downward. Collectively you have the upper structure and the detached floors falling downward, with increasing mass and energy setting off a pancaking effect causing the interior to drop at accelerating pace and the outer lattice of steel support to start peeling away like a banana skin.

6) All the buildings of the Trade Center shared a common basement and foundation structure, such that when the two Towers feel/collapsed, the weakened the foundation of others and this is why #7 also collapsed inward.

7) The Towers were built just before the personal computers boom happened and hence lacked the electrical wiring, transformers, and other equipment need for the modern offices of the 1980-1990s. There was constant interior upgrade bringing in electrical wiring, transformers, etc. and was some of the electrical transformers that caused the secondary explosions heard before the collapse as well as during the collapse.

8) Most commercial airliners are painted a dull to flat gray on the undersides, and both the 757 and 767 used in the attacks are twin jumbo jet engine aircraft. Their altitude above the ground witnesses, the early morning light angles, and the likelyhood of few of those observers knowing much about "military" aircraft of similar size and construct is part of what has lead to some mis-information and confusion as to what type of aircraft were involved.

FWIW - I spent most of 1996-2007 working for a major aircraft component sub-contrator making parts for both these aircraft. Both exterior and interior parts.
you didnt counter a single thing posted that explosives brought down the towers t.:auiqs.jpg:all of what you said has debunked in these two videos here.



and ESPECIALLY this great one.


 
Last edited:

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
9,515
Points
2,030
Still no evidence
It only takes a little common sense and knowledge of Newton's basic laws of physics to agree with us that neither the twins or Bldg 7 could have collapsed without controlled demolition charges having been placed there prior to 9/11, and it will eventually be shown to a grand jury, and put on record.

Whether or not folks get held accountable means nothing to me....only that the American people learn the truth.
CIA shills nazi boy and wrongwinger can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.:auiqs.jpg:
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
9,515
Points
2,030
Some of that is correct.
The rest of it is bullshit spewing from morons.

There were WAY too many indicators that pointed to Bush being the inside terrorist here.
There were WAY too many private journalists that spoke with a LOT of White House interns
that all said the same thing.....Bush was behind it. Too many notices left around his office(s) that
other people were privy to that confirmed what these interns claimed.

And kind of interesting, that ALL of these notes, witnesses, and interns suddenly "disappeared" a few days after their findings were published.

Jet fuel burns at around 410 degrees. Metals such as steel and iron start burning and melting around 1500 degrees. Jet fuel also does not cause explosions such as what destroyed these buildings.

Bush was in fact, a worm for the Dems, as he is butt-buddies with the Clintons....who turned the entire DNC into their private mafia organization in 1993.
:thankusmile: You nailed it my friend.:thup:
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
16,234
Reaction score
8,383
Points
1,108
I turned completely around on 9/11.

We were on a glide path to peace, prosperity and budget surpluses when our Intel Agencies murdered 3,000 Americans and blamed it on Islamists just to embroil us in an unwinnable war and built the surveillance State.

Most evil motherfuckers on the planet

OMG.. I get why you are such a raving nutter.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
122,025
Reaction score
37,453
Points
2,290
I turned completely around on 9/11.

We were on a glide path to peace, prosperity and budget surpluses when our Intel Agencies murdered 3,000 Americans and blamed it on Islamists just to embroil us in an unwinnable war and built the surveillance State.

Most evil motherfuckers on the planet

OMG.. I get why you are such a raving nutter.
A group of camel fuckers in a cave in Pashtun planned and carried out 9/11.

Sureeeeee
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
9,888
Reaction score
2,064
Points
265
Still no evidence
It only takes a little common sense and knowledge of Newton's basic laws of physics to agree with us that neither the twins or Bldg 7 could have collapsed without controlled demolition charges having been placed there prior to 9/11, and it will eventually be shown to a grand jury, and put on record.
Yes you and angelo are consistently defeated and sling shit in response.

You and gipper and angelo have always been my bitch and been made to look like drooling fools
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
9,888
Reaction score
2,064
Points
265
Some of that is correct.
The rest of it is bullshit spewing from morons.

There were WAY too many indicators that pointed to Bush being the inside terrorist here.
There were WAY too many private journalists that spoke with a LOT of White House interns
that all said the same thing.....Bush was behind it. Too many notices left around his office(s) that
other people were privy to that confirmed what these interns claimed.

And kind of interesting, that ALL of these notes, witnesses, and interns suddenly "disappeared" a few days after their findings were published.

Jet fuel burns at around 410 degrees. Metals such as steel and iron start burning and melting around 1500 degrees. Jet fuel also does not cause explosions such as what destroyed these buildings.

Bush was in fact, a worm for the Dems, as he is butt-buddies with the Clintons....who turned the entire DNC into their private mafia organization in 1993.
410degrees F is towards the low end of ignition for jet fuel, which is chemically very close to kerosene. The following excerpt is from one of many similar pages on the internet, but I choose this because it's more to the point. EXCERPT:
"Jet fuel burns at temperatures between 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Designed specifically for use with gas-turbine engines, jet fuel is available in three varieties: Jet A, Jet A-1 and Jet B. The latter is used for improved cold-weather performance.

The flash point of both Jet A and Jet A-1, the two most commonly used fuels for commercial aviation, is 100 F. They both have an autoignition temperature of 473 F.

Jet A is usually found only in the United States, and the rest of the world uses Jet A-1. The main difference between the two jet fuels is that A-1 freezes at a lower temperature. They are both kerosene-type jet fuels. "
...

There are a few other factors many fail to know or appreciate regards the explosions and fires in the towers;
1) Most modern commercial aircraft such as those used in the Sept. 11,2001 attacks have a significant portion of the material used in their construction being composites = plastics = made from petroleum. While framework and struts/spars, etc. are often metal, mostly aluminum; much of the exterior skin tends to be composites, mostly of carbon fiber with petroleum based resins(plastics) as the bonding agent. Interiors also have a large number of petroleum based synthetics for things such as carpet, seating and the stowage bins overhead which are usually made from fiberglass composites.

Bottom-line is that your modern airliner is almost as much plastic as your scale model kit of such and all these composites/plastics will burn when enough heat and flame is provided ~ such as an impact and explosion event that sets off huge combustions.

2) The interiors of most modern offices also have a mix of synthetic and "plastic" materials, along with some wood products, which collectively can add more fuel to a fire once such gets going.

3) The disintegration of impact when the aircraft crashed into the towers causes rapid fuel dispersal much like what would result with a Fuel-Air-Explosive type bomb, hence the jet fuel explosions looking like the fireballs they were.

4) All the above means that there was enough fuel load for the fires in addition to "just" the jet fuel to produce heat in the range of 1500 degrees F (+/-), sufficient to soften the steel support structure of the towers.

5) Most of the structural steel support of the towers was the lattice framework of the exteriors. The flooring was basically slab construct anchored to the exterior lattice framing for the majority of support. Once a portion of the exterior steel had been heated enough to soften and bend from stress loads of wight above, the bowing outward would undo the anchoring of the floors, allowing them to fall downward. Also, the support for the upper stories not involved in flame would be lost, allowing them to fall downward. Collectively you have the upper structure and the detached floors falling downward, with increasing mass and energy setting off a pancaking effect causing the interior to drop at accelerating pace and the outer lattice of steel support to start peeling away like a banana skin.

6) All the buildings of the Trade Center shared a common basement and foundation structure, such that when the two Towers feel/collapsed, the weakened the foundation of others and this is why #7 also collapsed inward.

7) The Towers were built just before the personal computers boom happened and hence lacked the electrical wiring, transformers, and other equipment need for the modern offices of the 1980-1990s. There was constant interior upgrade bringing in electrical wiring, transformers, etc. and was some of the electrical transformers that caused the secondary explosions heard before the collapse as well as during the collapse.

8) Most commercial airliners are painted a dull to flat gray on the undersides, and both the 757 and 767 used in the attacks are twin jumbo jet engine aircraft. Their altitude above the ground witnesses, the early morning light angles, and the likelyhood of few of those observers knowing much about "military" aircraft of similar size and construct is part of what has lead to some mis-information and confusion as to what type of aircraft were involved.

FWIW - I spent most of 1996-2007 working for a major aircraft component sub-contrator making parts for both these aircraft. Both exterior and interior parts.
you didnt counter a single thing posted that explosives brought down the towers t.:auiqs.jpg:all of what you said has debunked in these two videos here.



and ESPECIALLY this great one.


That is because one cannot counter fantasy.

No one especially you or that fat fool angelo has ever produced the slightest evidence that explosives were used.

None were and none of your second rater fools can demonstrate otherwise.

Angelo has been asked repeatedly and has never posted any

You dipshits are finished
 
OP
Angelo

Angelo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
31,000
Reaction score
15,482
Points
1,915
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Disinformation Agent Soupy is snippy tonight.
( takes bong hit and does Seth Rogan chuckle --Uh huh huh huh huh huh huh huh hu huuuh ! )
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
9,888
Reaction score
2,064
Points
265
Disinformation Agent Soupy is snippy tonight.
( takes bong hit and does Seth Rogan chuckle --Uh huh huh huh huh huh huh huh hu huuuh ! )
No such agents and stating fadts is not snippy.

Still no evidence from you fools
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
78,884
Reaction score
19,300
Points
2,180
20 years of lies....

Yeah... the 9/11 truthers should stop lying. Or bring fourth some proof that 0.0000001% of what you guys have alleged is true.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top