Patriot911
Rookie
- Banned
- #621
Are you saying fucktard Jones is a victim of PMS? Permanent Menstral Syndrome? By God, it FITS! Somebody give that "man" some midol, STAT!Your funny when you have your period.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying fucktard Jones is a victim of PMS? Permanent Menstral Syndrome? By God, it FITS! Somebody give that "man" some midol, STAT!Your funny when you have your period.
so, mainstreet America gets hit, the argument goes on and on about the specifics
i wanna know one thing here
WTF were all those tax $$$$'s that we've doled out to the military for generations doin' that day?
What they were supposed to be doing. Protecting us from threats coming in from overseas. We were caught with out pants down.
You shouldn't give me such easy assignments!
Here's a good one!
According to the NIST explanations they ignore and therefore violate the laws of physics, you nitpicking little troll!
NIST Project Leader Shyam Sunder explained that WTC 7 could not have come down in free-fall, because there was resistance to the fall provided by the steel structure underneath.
Many other physics analysis are presented by Chandler on his website 911SpeakOut.org, applying the laws of physics to WTC 7 and the Twin Towers. For a more detailed account of the unexplained features of the destruction of WTC Building 7, see the article on page 1.
Nullifying Newton: Official Story Violates Laws of Physics
Sure everyone noticed it, that's why it took them years to explain it As I've explained in the other thread about this, people generally refer to the main part of the building, you know the 47 story part that housed all the offices and where people worked, that fell essentially straight down, the part you disingenuous fucks call the "facade', the one that didn't show any signs of deformations.
BTW, funny how you seem to know so much about the penthouse, but don't mention the rumble or possible explosion right before it and the rest of the building come down.
New WTC 7 Video Indicates Explosion at Penthouse Before Collapse | The Truth
Why do you leave such things out?
Yes a court trial that was riddled with problems LOL, in which the defendants mental status was questioned, among other things.If one simply googles "massoui trial farce" they would have more insight to this trial.
This is a bad example of "justice" to hang your OCT on.
Of course someone has to mention this to you for you to start posting links.
Funny you didn't post anylinks to prove how it was the truth movement that started the "melted steel" rumor
I bet I can show you that more times then not you don't post links. You will be held accountable to continue posting links to back up your assertions, as I can show you countless times the majority of your posts are basically " you lie" or another lie, truthtard lies" and leave it at that with nothing to back it up.
Not hardly scumbag, all one has to do is take the time to look up your past postings and they would see how many times you have lied in various forms.
The most recent of which was when you asserted that the melting steel rumor was started by "fucktard truthers like you" to Triton.
This is a fact and the reality is you are a lying troll trying to disguise itself as a "patriot"
Your funny when you have your period.
shut up troll
so, mainstreet America gets hit, the argument goes on and on about the specifics
i wanna know one thing here
WTF were all those tax $$$$'s that we've doled out to the military for generations doin' that day?
What they were supposed to be doing. Protecting us from threats coming in from overseas. We were caught with out pants down.
but there was ample evidence of planed domestic terror attacks using hijacked planes as weapons
Your funny when you have your period.
shut up troll
Why don't you shut up, asshole?
Are you saying fucktard Jones is a victim of PMS? Permanent Menstral Syndrome? By God, it FITS! Somebody give that "man" some midol, STAT!Your funny when you have your period.
Contradicting yourself again. Did it experience freefall or not?Again, all we have is you dishonest fucks lying your asses off by making claims and not backing up shit. First off, the building did NOT fall at free fall acceleration. That is another blatant lie by you that you have been called on so many times yet insist on lying about. Just shows you can't even tell the truth when exposed.
WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds. The rest met resistance. The NIST report explains how this is possible.
Changing what definitions? It is you that makes up arguments and twists what others say around as strawman arguments. We refer to the 47 stories of the main building when we talk about the symmetry, of the collapse, and no deformations. You claim all this collapsing was taking place inside as though those components were not attached to the outside of the building! Yet no noticeable deformations were noticed, so you disingenuous trolls mention the penthouse, that was on top !?Oh, so now you're trying to weasle out of your lies by changing definitions? Go figure. You get exposed for lying so you come up with more lies to cover your sorry ass. Isn't going to work you disgusting piece of shit.
The rumble/explosion that you and NIST said didn't exist, and said were not picked up by audio. The video posted was obtained through the FOIA that NIST pretended they didn't receive, and initially did not respond to until a lawsuit was filed. NIST = Not Interested in Searching for TruthWhat.... you mean the rumble that would PERFECTLY FIT with the NIST theory? The one I have talked about numerous times? The rumble that could be the vertical and then horizontal internal collapse? Or were you ASSuming that would be perfectly silent?
You're a BS artist, it is imperative that people demand links from you like I did above, where NIST explains the free fall.So according to a dishonest piece of shit like you, I have to go into every angle of a point just for your edification? Nope. You're not worth the oxygen wasted on you to keep you alive. People want to know? I post it. I shouldn't have to explain it to you time and time again without you whining like a little bitch when I fail to mention an aspect of the total event.
The Zacarias Moussaoui was a farce. People interested can research it. The highlighted point above is exactly showing your way of thinking. It does not matter if it was not a fair trial, for you the ends justify the means. How unPatriotic and UnAmerican of you.Wrong yet again, fucktard. Regardless of ANY OTHER ISSUE with the trial, they couldn't have convicted Moussaoui without first proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. This is a FACT you cannot get around no matter what else happened in the trial. Excuses don't cut it here.
Yes you did you lying asshole, but instead of having the integrity of admitting it you sit and spin and lie some more It is all above and pointed out. You don't have the integrity to admit it like a man and move on, just as expected though, from a lying troll like you.Another lie from you. I've never made the claim it was the truthtard bowel movement that started the melted steel rumor. It never stops. Anyone else need proof of Fucktard Jones' complete lack of morals, integrity or honesty?
So it doesn't matter that I can post more times then not that most times you don't post links?Doesn't matter. You lied and said I NEVER post links. This is a blatant lie where you trying to dishonestly weasle out of it isn't going to cut it. I post links when asked. You fucktards can't say the same, can you. Still waiting for you to post a single shred of evidence.
If my so called lies are soooo obvious then it should be no problem in posting your links that prove me wrong, but you hardly ever do. Now you say someone has to ask you for links first? Tell you what from now on whenever you want to address something I post, instead of saying "you lie" back it up with a link from a credible source. Consider this my official request.Most of the time your bullshit lies are so obvious I shouldn't have to back it up. In the mean time, if asked, I back it up. You dishonest fucks run away when asked to back up your bullshit or post articles from conspiratard sites or articles that have been corrected for years.
Um the only thing you have exposed is yourself, as a trolling liar, hypocrite, and BS artist that uses every form of fallacy arguments to try and debate, and that shows no integrity, or honesty.Your track record of all of this speaks for itself. The history of your postings are archived for others to verify this if they wish to do so.Yet you can't point them out even when you try. You got your ass handed to you and your numerous lies exposed.
This has already been pointed out below and above, all that's left is for you to man up, admit your "mistake" and move on, but we know you wont even in the face of this blatant lie of yours, because you aren't a man, nor have any integrity, or honesty within you. And since when did I say I am some sort of official spokesman for the truth movement? Wasn't it you who said we have many opinions??Wrong yet again. When are you going to stop lying? You're embarassing yourself and the rest of the truthtard bowel movement!
The highlighted part speaks volumes of you lying .Here is what was said
Nowhere do I state it was the sole providence of truthtards, nor do I state who started the claims. When are you going to come clean and admit you're nothing but a fucktard troll who likes to make up lies? It will do your soul a lot of good. Who knows? Maybe you won't spend eternity with Osama, Hitler and the rest of the traitors of humanity.I've never made that claim. That is usually done by fucktard truthers like you who don't know the difference.
Contradicting yourself again. Did it experience freefall or not?Again, all we have is you dishonest fucks lying your asses off by making claims and not backing up shit. First off, the building did NOT fall at free fall acceleration. That is another blatant lie by you that you have been called on so many times yet insist on lying about. Just shows you can't even tell the truth when exposed.
WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds. The rest met resistance. The NIST report explains how this is possible.
And no where that I have found where the NIST report explains the 2.25 secs. of freefall. They just mentioned it and moved on.
Link please.
Changing what definitions? It is you that makes up arguments and twists what others say around as strawman arguments. We refer to the 47 stories of the main building when we talk about the symmetry, of the collapse, and no deformations. You claim all this collapsing was taking place inside as though those components were not attached to the outside of the building! Yet no noticeable deformations were noticed, so you disingenuous trolls mention the penthouse, that was on top !?Oh, so now you're trying to weasle out of your lies by changing definitions? Go figure. You get exposed for lying so you come up with more lies to cover your sorry ass. Isn't going to work you disgusting piece of shit.
This is an example of how you resort to twisting what someones intent is to suit your need to create a strawman argument. Clear as day.
The rumble/explosion that you and NIST said didn't exist, and said were not picked up by audio. The video posted was obtained through the FOIA that NIST pretended they didn't receive, and initially did not respond to until a lawsuit was filed. NIST = Not Interested in Searching for Truth
You're a BS artist, it is imperative that people demand links from you like I did above, where NIST explains the free fall.
You also have a habit of misinterpreting what someone says on purpose, so that your rebuttal fits your newly created argument point.
The Zacarias Moussaoui was a farce. People interested can research it. The highlighted point above is exactly showing your way of thinking. It does not matter if it was not a fair trial, for you the ends justify the means. How unPatriotic and UnAmerican of you.
Yes you did you lying asshole, but instead of having the integrity of admitting it you sit and spin and lie some more It is all above and pointed out. You don't have the integrity to admit it like a man and move on, just as expected though, from a lying troll like you.
So it doesn't matter that I can post more times then not that most times you don't post links?
It is the basis for the argument, in your delusional world this doesn't matter??
You just mentioned in the beginning of this post NIST explains the free fall, yet you provided no link to back up your claims, you again prove my point that you don't post links when you assert something, and that you are a lying scumbag troll.
Thank you for proving my point.
If my so called lies are soooo obvious then it should be no problem in posting your links that prove me wrong, but you hardly ever do. Now you say someone has to ask you for links first? Tell you what from now on whenever you want to address something I post, instead of saying "you lie" back it up with a link from a credible source. Consider this my official request.
Um the only thing you have exposed is yourself, as a trolling liar, hypocrite, and BS artist that uses every form of fallacy arguments to try and debate, and that shows no integrity, or honesty.Your track record of all of this speaks for itself. The history of your postings are archived for others to verify this if they wish to do so.
This has already been pointed out below and above, all that's left is for you to man up, admit your "mistake" and move on, but we know you wont even in the face of this blatant lie of yours, because you aren't a man, nor have any integrity, or honesty within you. And since when did I say I am some sort of official spokesman for the truth movement? Wasn't it you who said we have many opinions??
The highlighted part speaks volumes of you lying .Here is what was said
Nowhere do I state it was the sole providence of truthtards, nor do I state who started the claims. When are you going to come clean and admit you're nothing but a fucktard troll who likes to make up lies? It will do your soul a lot of good. Who knows? Maybe you won't spend eternity with Osama, Hitler and the rest of the traitors of humanity.I've never made that claim. That is usually done by fucktard truthers like you who don't know the difference.
How can you when you have your head up your ass all the time, and ignore the many links and postings others provide for you?And yet I am still not seeing a shred of evidence that can disprove the 911CR or the NIST reports. Go figure......
It did not. This has been pointed out to you time and time again, yet you are STILL either too fucking stupid or too fucking dishonest. To say something fell at freefall acceleration is to say something fell at freefall acceleration and nothing else. To say it fell for 2.25 seconds of freefall acceleration and was slower the rest of the time is accurate and truthful.Contradicting yourself again. Did it experience freefall or not?Again, all we have is you dishonest fucks lying your asses off by making claims and not backing up shit. First off, the building did NOT fall at free fall acceleration. That is another blatant lie by you that you have been called on so many times yet insist on lying about. Just shows you can't even tell the truth when exposed.
WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds. The rest met resistance. The NIST report explains how this is possible.
NIST reportMr. Jones said:And no where that I have found where the NIST report explains the 2.25 secs. of freefall. They just mentioned it and moved on.
Link please.
The definition of the exterior of the building. You claimed it showed no signs of deformation, and when this was exposed as a lie, you pretend you were only talking about the walls, not the entire building. Keep it up, weasle! You're doing a great job of exposing your dishonesty!Mr. Jones said:Changing what definitions?Oh, so now you're trying to weasle out of your lies by changing definitions? Go figure. You get exposed for lying so you come up with more lies to cover your sorry ass. Isn't going to work you disgusting piece of shit.
Just what we would expect someone who just got their ass handed to them to say. WAAAAH! You fucking baby!Mr. Jones said:It is you that makes up arguments and twists what others say around as strawman arguments.
So the penthouse somehow doesn't count as part of the main building? WTF do you think was holding up the penthouse you ignorant fuck!Mr. Jones said:We refer to the 47 stories of the main building when we talk about the symmetry, of the collapse, and no deformations.
Try to follow along, fucktard.... the penthouse falling PROVES the interior was collapsing before the exterior. If YOU were right, the Penthouse should have remained standing until the entire building fell.Mr. Jones said:You claim all this collapsing was taking place inside as though those components were not attached to the outside of the building! Yet no noticeable deformations were noticed, so you disingenuous trolls mention the penthouse, that was on top !?
No, you're just making up excuses because you got the shit kicked out of you.... AGAIN!Mr. Jones said:This is an example of how you resort to twisting what someones intent is to suit your need to create a strawman argument. Clear as day.
Mr. Jones said:The rumble/explosion that you and NIST said didn't exist, and said were not picked up by audio.[/qutoe]
Rumble does not equal explosion you dishonest FUCKTARD! Care to show us any examples of controlled demolition where all you hear is a rumble before the collapse instead of explosives? You fucking dishonest traitors really expect everyone ELSE to be complete idiots in order to believe your bullshit, don't you!
I've shown you videos not associated with the NIST AT ALL that shows the same thing. Once again bullshit artist Fucktard Jones ignores the truth to push bullshit.Mr. Jones said:The video posted was obtained through the FOIA that NIST pretended they didn't receive, and initially did not respond to until a lawsuit was filed. NIST = Not Interested in Searching for Truth
Yet you rarely post links to back up your bullshit. Hmmmm. What a fucking hypocrite liar you are. You demand more of others than you can possibly produce.Mr. Jones said:You're a BS artist, it is imperative that people demand links from you like I did above, where NIST explains the free fall.
Wrong again, fucktard! You're the one who constantly puts words in other peoples mouths that is completely contradictory to what was said. For instance, you claimed I said truthtards started the rumor of melted steel. I never said anything of the sort.Mr. Jones said:You also have a habit of misinterpreting what someone says on purpose, so that your rebuttal fits your newly created argument point.
Wrong again, Fucktard Jones! Once again you ignore the FACT that regardless of ANYTHING ELSE with the trial, the prosecutors HAD TO PROVE beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. They did so. Thus your bullshit claim of Al Qaeda having never been proven to be behind 9/11 remains a baldfaced lie. Your fucked up OPINION of the Moussaoui trial means jack shit. I know it. You know it. Everyone else knows it.Mr. Jones said:The Zacarias Moussaoui was a farce. People interested can research it. The highlighted point above is exactly showing your way of thinking. It does not matter if it was not a fair trial, for you the ends justify the means. How unPatriotic and UnAmerican of you.
So why didn't you link where I said truthtards created the rumor of melted steel? We both know why. You can make the claim all you want, but we BOTH know I never made that claim.Mr. Jones said:Yes you did you lying asshole, but instead of having the integrity of admitting it you sit and spin and lie some more It is all above and pointed out. You don't have the integrity to admit it like a man and move on, just as expected though, from a lying troll like you.
No. It doesn't. You lied your slimy ass off that I NEVER post links. I proved you wrong. What was it you were saying just a little bit ago? "You don't have the integrity to admit it like a man and move on, just as expected though, from a lying troll like you." Eat your own words you disgusting piece of shit!Mr. Jones said:So it doesn't matter that I can post more times then not that most times you don't post links?
No, it is NOT the basis of the argument. For someone who accuses others of twisting things, you sure do do a lot of it. Let me remind you what the basis of the argument is; YOU LYING YOUR DISGUSTING ASS OFF. Your lie is that I never post links. Your words. Not mine. Pretending like the ratio of posts to links somehow validates your lie is bullshit because your lie flat out is not true. ANYONE can see that. Except, of course, truthtard fuckwads like you who refuse to see the truth.Mr. Jones said:It is the basis for the argument, in your delusional world this doesn't matter??
Wrong again, king of the liars. I said I post proof when asked. I posted proof when asked. Once again you've been caught in a lie. It really does never stop with you does it. I am seriously enjoying you exposing your dishonesty for everyone to see. What do you think your credibility is now?Mr. Jones said:You just mentioned in the beginning of this post NIST explains the free fall, yet you provided no link to back up your claims, you again prove my point that you don't post links when you assert something, and that you are a lying scumbag troll.
The only thing that has been proven is that you are a disgusting liar. The lie was I NEVER post links, yet I've posted many before you made that lie, including one to you just a few posts earlier. Suck on that, pig!Mr. Jones said:Thank you for proving my point.
I don't need to. Most of your lies are obvious on their face. When it makes sense to post a link, I do. Like when you claimed the NASA photographs proved temperatures at 2800F, yet only showed temperatures at 1400F. Did you address that? No. You ran like a little bitch.Mr. Jones said:If my so called lies are soooo obvious then it should be no problem in posting your links that prove me wrong, but you hardly ever do.
No, just piece of shits like you who I know I've linked before and who I know don't bother to read links.Mr. Jones said:Now you say someone has to ask you for links first?
How about you post credible links to back up your bullshit first! Oh wait. Then you would never be able to post!Mr. Jones said:Tell you what from now on whenever you want to address something I post, instead of saying "you lie" back it up with a link from a credible source.
Wrong yet again! All you've been doing is making excuses as to why your blatant lies aren't lies, and you SUCK at coming up with excuses!Mr. Jones said:Um the only thing you have exposed is yourself, as a trolling liar, hypocrite, and BS artist that uses every form of fallacy arguments to try and debate, and that shows no integrity, or honesty.Your track record of all of this speaks for itself. The history of your postings are archived for others to verify this if they wish to do so.
Yet you STILL can't post a link to what you claim are multitudes of lies. In the mean time, I DO admit when I make mistakes and I can prove that as well. Keep digging, asshole! You're bound to hit the center of the earth sooner or later!Mr. Jones said:This has already been pointed out below and above, all that's left is for you to man up, admit your "mistake" and move on, but we know you wont even in the face of this blatant lie of yours, because you aren't a man, nor have any integrity, or honesty within you. And since when did I say I am some sort of official spokesman for the truth movement? Wasn't it you who said we have many opinions??
Wrong yet again, you dishonest piece of shit! YOUR claim is that I said truthards STARTED the rumors of molten steel, yet I don't say anything of the sort. The fact that I said fucktard truthers is MEANINGLESS in the face of your lie! Or are you just too fucking stupid to understand all this?Mr. Jones said:The highlighted part speaks volumes of you lying .Here is what was said
Nowhere do I state it was the sole providence of truthtards, nor do I state who started the claims. When are you going to come clean and admit you're nothing but a fucktard troll who likes to make up lies? It will do your soul a lot of good. Who knows? Maybe you won't spend eternity with Osama, Hitler and the rest of the traitors of humanity.I've never made that claim. That is usually done by fucktard truthers like you who don't know the difference.
Thanks for proving yet again what a worthless piece of shit excuse for a human being you are, you traitorous scum! Al Qaeda is proud of ignorant assholes like you trying to destroy America from within.
How can you when you have your head up your ass all the time, and ignore the many links and postings others provide for you?And yet I am still not seeing a shred of evidence that can disprove the 911CR or the NIST reports. Go figure......
Shit a simple search will answer your statement, but we all know you wont bother, and just come here to say meaningless things like this.
How can you when you have your head up your ass all the time, and ignore the many links and postings others provide for you?And yet I am still not seeing a shred of evidence that can disprove the 911CR or the NIST reports. Go figure......
Shit a simple search will answer your statement, but we all know you wont bother, and just come here to say meaningless things like this.
Patriot911 says "fucktard" more times in one post than the number of seconds it took WTC 7 collapse into its own foundation