80% OF PEOPLE GETTING PUBLIC HOUSING BENEFITS VOTE DEMOCRAT

[Nosmo King]

If democrats didnt buy votes with this kind of stuff, they wouldnt be able to win elections.

Voter turnout is at an all time low. fewer that 40% of the voters turned out in 2012. How many of the poor turned out to vote?

You're looking for an answer to a question that is not asked.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

What handouts does the middle class get? None.

Mortgage interest deduction. Child tax credit. Employer-sponsored health insurance exemption.

The top ten personal tax expenditure handouts added up to $709 billion in 2014. And that's just the top ten.

Total spending on welfare for 2014: $600 billion.

So people getting to keep more of their own money is a government handout??

Yes, because it is paid for by higher tax rates.

And you aren't getting to keep more of your money. I explained above how that lie you swallow is the perfect con.

You're delusional.

 

[David_42]

And this is a bad thing? People in public housing, housing that keeps a roof over there heads, generally support the party that wants to protect them.

The party that wants to keep them poor and miserable, is what you mean.
The point of poverty programs is supposed to be to end poverty. But with Demcorats those programs promote poverty.

Bullshit, the programs are proven to help people get out of poverty, and taking measurements post 2008 to determine the effectiveness of programs the number of the poor isn't a good way to do things.

Show statistics please.
I know in this area of the country, most are on welfare as if it was a family business that gets passed from generation to generation.
and, if it is so much of a program that gets people out of poverty, why do the democrats fight limits on it? like, you get 4 years max then nothing per family.

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

 

[g5000]

Let's say we eliminated all welfare spending. Food stamps, Obamaphones, whatever the **** you guys are always whining on about.

We would still have a federal budget. We would all still have to pay taxes. Yes, they would be lower, but now let's see how your tax deduction costs everyone else, and yourself, money.

Two neighbors. Identical incomes. Their collective share of the federal budget is, say, $1000. This means they each owe $500.

But wait. Ted has bought some products for which the government rewards him. He gets a $100 deduction! Woo hoo! "I get to keep more of my money!", exclaims Ted.

So Ted's tax bill is now $400 instead of $500.

But wait. The two neighbors still collectively owe $1000.

That means Ted's neighbor is going to have to make up the difference, or the government is going to have a $100 deficit.

See how that works?

Your tax deduction comes out of other people's pockets.

But it also comes out of your own. How?

Well, to get more money out of Ted's neighbor, Bernie, the government obviously has to raise Bernie's tax rate.

But hold on a second. Ted and Bernie earn identical incomes, remember? So that means Ted's income tax rate goes up, too.

So the government raises taxes by five percent.

Now, instead of owing $500, Ted and Bernie each owe $525.

After taking out his $100 deduction, Ted pays $425.

Has Ted actually gotten to keep $100 of his own money? Nope. Because his tax rate is higher, he really only made $75.

And his neighbor Bernie is paying $25 extra on his taxes because of the higher tax rate. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

But the budget is STILL not balanced. $425 + $525 is $950. So we have a $50 deficit.

And that is how the current system works. Higher tax rates and deficit spending.

But it gets worse. The MID is rolled into the price of Ted's house. He is paying more for his mortgage because of the MID. So Ted's big tax deduction is actually zeroed out by higher home prices and higher tax rates.

Ted believes the gigantic lie that he is getting to keep more of his own money. BWA-HA-HA-HA! The perfect con. The rube doesn't even know he's been taken and thinks he came out ahead!

The people who are ACTUALLY making out are the people who benefit from higher home prices: builders, real estate agents, brokers, and bankers. That's one of the big reasons the real estate lobby spends $133 million a year on cash contributions to Congress and lobbying. They make a $96 billion profit. "Thanks a lot Ted!", the real estate lobby exclaims. They loooooove Ted the Rube.

And not only that, Bernie is subsidizing Ted. He is paying $525 in taxes instead of his fair share of $500.

And not only that, we have an insane system where two people earning identical incomes are paying radically different taxes. Bernie: $525. Ted: $425.

So, yeah. That "getting to keep more of my own money" thing is a $1.2 trillion lie. You are stealing from your neighbors and yourself, and redistributing that wealth up the food chain.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The party that wants to keep them poor and miserable, is what you mean.
The point of poverty programs is supposed to be to end poverty. But with Demcorats those programs promote poverty.

Bullshit, the programs are proven to help people get out of poverty, and taking measurements post 2008 to determine the effectiveness of programs the number of the poor isn't a good way to do things.

Show statistics please.
I know in this area of the country, most are on welfare as if it was a family business that gets passed from generation to generation.
and, if it is so much of a program that gets people out of poverty, why do the democrats fight limits on it? like, you get 4 years max then nothing per family.

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

 

[David_42]

Bullshit, the programs are proven to help people get out of poverty, and taking measurements post 2008 to determine the effectiveness of programs the number of the poor isn't a good way to do things.

Show statistics please.
I know in this area of the country, most are on welfare as if it was a family business that gets passed from generation to generation.
and, if it is so much of a program that gets people out of poverty, why do the democrats fight limits on it? like, you get 4 years max then nothing per family.

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Let's say we eliminated all welfare spending. Food stamps, Obamaphones, whatever the **** you guys are always whining on about.

We would still have a federal budget. We would all still have to pay taxes. Yes, they would be lower, but now let's see how your tax deduction costs everyone else, and yourself, money.

Two neighbors. Identical incomes. Their collective share of the federal budget is, say, $1000. This means they each owe $500.

But wait. Ted has bought some products for which the government rewards him. He gets a $100 deduction! Woo hoo! "I get to keep more of my money!", exclaims Ted.

So Ted's tax bill is now $400 instead of $500.

But wait. The two neighbors still collectively owe $1000.

That means Ted's neighbor is going to have to make up the difference, or the government is going to have a $100 deficit.

See how that works?

Your tax deduction comes out of other people's pockets.

But it also comes out of your own. How?

Well, to get more money out of Ted's neighbor, Bernie, the government obviously has to raise Bernie's tax rate.

But hold on a second. Ted and Bernie earn identical incomes, remember? So that means Ted's income tax rate goes up, too.

So the government raises taxes by five percent.

Now, instead of owing $500, Ted and Bernie each owe $525.

After taking out his $100 deduction, Ted pays $425.

Has Ted actually gotten to keep $100 of his own money? Nope. Because his tax rate is higher, he really only made $75.

And his neighbor Bernie is paying $25 extra on his taxes because of the higher tax rate. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

But the budget is STILL not balanced. $425 + $525 is $950. So we have a $50 deficit.

And that is how the current system works. Higher tax rates and deficit spending.

But it gets worse. The MID is rolled into the price of Ted's house. He is paying more for his mortgage because of the MID. So Ted's big tax deduction is actually zeroed out by higher home prices and higher tax rates.

Ted believes the gigantic lie that he is getting to keep more of his own money. BWA-HA-HA-HA! The perfect con. The rube doesn't even know he's been taken and thinks he came out ahead!

The people who are ACTUALLY making out are the people who benefit from higher home prices: builders, real estate agents, brokers, and bankers. That's one of the big reasons the real estate lobby spends $133 million a year on cash contributions to Congress and lobbying. They make a $96 billion profit. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

And not only that, Bernie is subsidizing Ted. He is paying $525 in taxes instead of his fair share of $500.

And not only that, we have an insane system where two people earning identical incomes are paying radically different tax rates. Bernie: $525. Ted: $425.

So, yeah. That "getting to keep more of my own money" thing is a $1.2 trillion lie.

and the perfect argument for a flat tax with no deductions and no income limits.
both pay the same. everyone pays the same from the poor to the rich, the same is paid.

 

[David_42]

Let's say we eliminated all welfare spending. Food stamps, Obamaphones, whatever the **** you guys are always whining on about.

We would still have a federal budget. We would all still have to pay taxes. Yes, they would be lower, but now let's see how your tax deduction costs everyone else, and yourself, money.

Two neighbors. Identical incomes. Their collective share of the federal budget is, say, $1000. This means they each owe $500.

But wait. Ted has bought some products for which the government rewards him. He gets a $100 deduction! Woo hoo! "I get to keep more of my money!", exclaims Ted.

So Ted's tax bill is now $400 instead of $500.

But wait. The two neighbors still collectively owe $1000.

That means Ted's neighbor is going to have to make up the difference, or the government is going to have a $100 deficit.

See how that works?

Your tax deduction comes out of other people's pockets.

But it also comes out of your own. How?

Well, to get more money out of Ted's neighbor, Bernie, the government obviously has to raise Bernie's tax rate.

But hold on a second. Ted and Bernie earn identical incomes, remember? So that means Ted's income tax rate goes up, too.

So the government raises taxes by five percent.

Now, instead of owing $500, Ted and Bernie each owe $525.

After taking out his $100 deduction, Ted pays $425.

Has Ted actually gotten to keep $100 of his own money? Nope. Because his tax rate is higher, he really only made $75.

And his neighbor Bernie is paying $25 extra on his taxes because of the higher tax rate. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

But the budget is STILL not balanced. $425 + $525 is $950. So we have a $50 deficit.

And that is how the current system works. Higher tax rates and deficit spending.

But it gets worse. The MID is rolled into the price of Ted's house. He is paying more for his mortgage because of the MID. So Ted's big tax deduction is actually zeroed out by higher home prices and higher tax rates.

Ted believes the gigantic lie that he is getting to keep more of his own money. BWA-HA-HA-HA! The perfect con. The rube doesn't even know he's been taken and thinks he came out ahead!

The people who are ACTUALLY making out are the people who benefit from higher home prices: builders, real estate agents, brokers, and bankers. That's one of the big reasons the real estate lobby spends $133 million a year on cash contributions to Congress and lobbying. They make a $96 billion profit. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

And not only that, Bernie is subsidizing Ted. He is paying $525 in taxes instead of his fair share of $500.

And not only that, we have an insane system where two people earning identical incomes are paying radically different tax rates. Bernie: $525. Ted: $425.

So, yeah. That "getting to keep more of my own money" thing is a $1.2 trillion lie.

and the perfect argument for a flat tax with no deductions and no income limits.
both pay the same. everyone pays the same from the poor to the rich, the same is paid.

It doesn't work, it's impossible, it would require massively destroying social services and would lead to even worse inequality. I shouldn't have to explain why.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Show statistics please.
I know in this area of the country, most are on welfare as if it was a family business that gets passed from generation to generation.
and, if it is so much of a program that gets people out of poverty, why do the democrats fight limits on it? like, you get 4 years max then nothing per family.

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

the majority do. and to top it off, they cant seem to stop having babies becuase every neglected baby is more money in their pocket.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Let's say we eliminated all welfare spending. Food stamps, Obamaphones, whatever the **** you guys are always whining on about.

We would still have a federal budget. We would all still have to pay taxes. Yes, they would be lower, but now let's see how your tax deduction costs everyone else, and yourself, money.

Two neighbors. Identical incomes. Their collective share of the federal budget is, say, $1000. This means they each owe $500.

But wait. Ted has bought some products for which the government rewards him. He gets a $100 deduction! Woo hoo! "I get to keep more of my money!", exclaims Ted.

So Ted's tax bill is now $400 instead of $500.

But wait. The two neighbors still collectively owe $1000.

That means Ted's neighbor is going to have to make up the difference, or the government is going to have a $100 deficit.

See how that works?

Your tax deduction comes out of other people's pockets.

But it also comes out of your own. How?

Well, to get more money out of Ted's neighbor, Bernie, the government obviously has to raise Bernie's tax rate.

But hold on a second. Ted and Bernie earn identical incomes, remember? So that means Ted's income tax rate goes up, too.

So the government raises taxes by five percent.

Now, instead of owing $500, Ted and Bernie each owe $525.

After taking out his $100 deduction, Ted pays $425.

Has Ted actually gotten to keep $100 of his own money? Nope. Because his tax rate is higher, he really only made $75.

And his neighbor Bernie is paying $25 extra on his taxes because of the higher tax rate. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

But the budget is STILL not balanced. $425 + $525 is $950. So we have a $50 deficit.

And that is how the current system works. Higher tax rates and deficit spending.

But it gets worse. The MID is rolled into the price of Ted's house. He is paying more for his mortgage because of the MID. So Ted's big tax deduction is actually zeroed out by higher home prices and higher tax rates.

Ted believes the gigantic lie that he is getting to keep more of his own money. BWA-HA-HA-HA! The perfect con. The rube doesn't even know he's been taken and thinks he came out ahead!

The people who are ACTUALLY making out are the people who benefit from higher home prices: builders, real estate agents, brokers, and bankers. That's one of the big reasons the real estate lobby spends $133 million a year on cash contributions to Congress and lobbying. They make a $96 billion profit. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

And not only that, Bernie is subsidizing Ted. He is paying $525 in taxes instead of his fair share of $500.

And not only that, we have an insane system where two people earning identical incomes are paying radically different tax rates. Bernie: $525. Ted: $425.

So, yeah. That "getting to keep more of my own money" thing is a $1.2 trillion lie.

and the perfect argument for a flat tax with no deductions and no income limits.
both pay the same. everyone pays the same from the poor to the rich, the same is paid.

It doesn't work, it's impossible, it would require massively destroying social services and would lead to even worse inequality. I shouldn't have to explain why.

social services needs to be destroyed. and it would bring equality, not inequality.

 

[g5000]

Show statistics please.
I know in this area of the country, most are on welfare as if it was a family business that gets passed from generation to generation.
and, if it is so much of a program that gets people out of poverty, why do the democrats fight limits on it? like, you get 4 years max then nothing per family.

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine.

Just the blacks and Mexicans, you know.

 

[David_42]

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

the majority do. and to top it off, they cant seem to stop having babies becuase every neglected baby is more money in their pocket.

Your nothing more then a hateful bigot. You literally just said most people on social security/Medicare/etc use cocaine. Idiot.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment
Welfare programs shown to reduce poverty in America

How the Safety Net Cuts Poverty Rates

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine.

Just the blacks and Mexicans.

thats a fairly racist comment. You should reconsider before making statements like that.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

the majority do. and to top it off, they cant seem to stop having babies becuase every neglected baby is more money in their pocket.

Your nothing more then a hateful bigot. You literally just said most people on social security/Medicare/etc use cocaine. Idiot.

I see what I see.
sorry if you think someone elses money should be yours just because you were born.
try working for a living then get back to us.
or if you do work, start donating more, I think there is a spot on your taxes that you can give extra money if you want.

 

[David_42]

Let's say we eliminated all welfare spending. Food stamps, Obamaphones, whatever the **** you guys are always whining on about.

We would still have a federal budget. We would all still have to pay taxes. Yes, they would be lower, but now let's see how your tax deduction costs everyone else, and yourself, money.

Two neighbors. Identical incomes. Their collective share of the federal budget is, say, $1000. This means they each owe $500.

But wait. Ted has bought some products for which the government rewards him. He gets a $100 deduction! Woo hoo! "I get to keep more of my money!", exclaims Ted.

So Ted's tax bill is now $400 instead of $500.

But wait. The two neighbors still collectively owe $1000.

That means Ted's neighbor is going to have to make up the difference, or the government is going to have a $100 deficit.

See how that works?

Your tax deduction comes out of other people's pockets.

But it also comes out of your own. How?

Well, to get more money out of Ted's neighbor, Bernie, the government obviously has to raise Bernie's tax rate.

But hold on a second. Ted and Bernie earn identical incomes, remember? So that means Ted's income tax rate goes up, too.

So the government raises taxes by five percent.

Now, instead of owing $500, Ted and Bernie each owe $525.

After taking out his $100 deduction, Ted pays $425.

Has Ted actually gotten to keep $100 of his own money? Nope. Because his tax rate is higher, he really only made $75.

And his neighbor Bernie is paying $25 extra on his taxes because of the higher tax rate. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

But the budget is STILL not balanced. $425 + $525 is $950. So we have a $50 deficit.

And that is how the current system works. Higher tax rates and deficit spending.

But it gets worse. The MID is rolled into the price of Ted's house. He is paying more for his mortgage because of the MID. So Ted's big tax deduction is actually zeroed out by higher home prices and higher tax rates.

Ted believes the gigantic lie that he is getting to keep more of his own money. BWA-HA-HA-HA! The perfect con. The rube doesn't even know he's been taken and thinks he came out ahead!

The people who are ACTUALLY making out are the people who benefit from higher home prices: builders, real estate agents, brokers, and bankers. That's one of the big reasons the real estate lobby spends $133 million a year on cash contributions to Congress and lobbying. They make a $96 billion profit. Thanks a ******* lot Ted!

And not only that, Bernie is subsidizing Ted. He is paying $525 in taxes instead of his fair share of $500.

And not only that, we have an insane system where two people earning identical incomes are paying radically different tax rates. Bernie: $525. Ted: $425.

So, yeah. That "getting to keep more of my own money" thing is a $1.2 trillion lie.

and the perfect argument for a flat tax with no deductions and no income limits.
both pay the same. everyone pays the same from the poor to the rich, the same is paid.

It doesn't work, it's impossible, it would require massively destroying social services and would lead to even worse inequality. I shouldn't have to explain why.

social services needs to be destroyed. and it would bring equality, not inequality.

Typical Christian Right wing nutter. Take away food stamps from kids and seniors.

 

[g5000]

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine.

Just the blacks and Mexicans.

thats a fairly racist comment. You should reconsider before making statements like that.

They use their EBT cards to buy liquor and steaks. Hookers and blow.

It's common knowledge around here among a lot of right wingers. They've gone on about it quite a bit.

They talk about shit like that to reinforce their "because gifts" electoral theory, not realizing they are demonstrating the whole time how much the Right hates minorities.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Wrong. The last article assumes that if those programs didnt exist people would simply sit on the street and do nothing.

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

the majority do. and to top it off, they cant seem to stop having babies becuase every neglected baby is more money in their pocket.

Your nothing more then a hateful bigot. You literally just said most people on social security/Medicare/etc use cocaine. Idiot.

by the way, another liberal tactic, when did social security become welfare?
you sir, are an uninformed idiot.

 

[David_42]

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine. Many work, are seniors, children, can't find a job to support themselves.. You're a lying sack of shit.

the majority do. and to top it off, they cant seem to stop having babies becuase every neglected baby is more money in their pocket.

Your nothing more then a hateful bigot. You literally just said most people on social security/Medicare/etc use cocaine. Idiot.

by the way, another liberal tactic, when did social security become welfare?
you sir, are an uninformed idiot.

Do you know the usage of welfare? No?

 

[g5000]

EVERYBODY takes. Then whines about the other guy taking. It would be hilarious if it wasn't dragging the whole country under.

"Gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it."

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Err, those people also work and it's called a safety net for a reason. What would they do without a safety net? Private charities couldn't handle the Great Depression, what makes you think they'd handle millions without any help?

ERR. no they dont. most of them just sit on the stoop smoking crack while waiting for their welfare check.
its not my responsibility to pay for others that refuse to produce.

You can't actually believe that most people on "welfare" which includes food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.. Are using cocaine.

Just the blacks and Mexicans.

thats a fairly racist comment. You should reconsider before making statements like that.

They use their EBT cards to buy liquor and steaks. Hookers and blow.

It's common knowledge around here among a lot of right wingers. They've gone on about it quite a bit.

They talk about shit like that to reinforce their "because gifts" electoral theory, not realizing they are demonstrating the whole time how much the Right hates minorities.

I have seen them do that, Ive also seen them pulling money out of the ATM at the casino in Maryland with their EBT card.
If we are going to have welfare I would suggest they have food dropped off weekly for them to eat. each gets the same (unless health situations require different). no money no choice. Beggers cant and should not be choosers.