80 million on Medicaid

That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.

Republicans keep crashing the economy and they keep repeating that mistake over and over again. Cut taxes, blow up the deficit, crash the economy.

So why do people keep voting the Republicans in the office when the only thing they have done for the past 40 years is to crash the economy in favour of the wealthy.

The wealthy have come out ahead in everyone of these crashes and working in middle-class people get further and further behind.

But you keep voting for them.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold and over valuation of the dollar during the oil crisis of the 1970s, and Milton Friedman's "tome" became popular in arguing that the monetary supply should just be tied to growth (or decline) in gnp so that the money supply would avoid both inflation and deflation.

The fed began buying govt bonds (debt) as part of QE. While the deficits under Obama decreased once the recession ended, the Fed did not sell off all of it's bond holdings. I believe they pursued the policy of once a bond matured, they simply "wrote it off their books" or it went poof. That would work

But when Trump became potus and the gop passed its two tax cuts, and growth DID NOT cause revenues to rise to offset the lost revenue, the Fed purchased govt debt again. That set in place a way to issue all the debt we want even if no one wants to buy it.
 
Last edited:
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.

But you keep voting for them.
I don’t vote for Republicans, never have, never will. You’re WAY out your depth in this conversation, let the adults talk you might learn something if you take off those partisan blinders and try to be objective for a change……..
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
 

Liberals are the biggest dumbasses on the planet. They prove it with the all disastrous things they support like letting other countries export their poverty here. How dumb do you have to be to have open borders? If they is what they are learning with their education system then some teachers need to be fired.
You seem upset by the voting patterns of the best-educated and most prosperous states, but I doubt if any will defer to your insistence they they follow your lead since their approach is obviously working for them.

No one I know of is advocating for your "open borders" as an immigration policy. Some free-market capitalists promote tariff-free commerce in that regard.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.

But you keep voting for them.
I don’t vote for Republicans, never have, never will. You’re WAY out your depth in this conversation, let the adults talk you might learn something if you take off those partisan blinders and try to be objective for a change……..

What an arrogant little twit you are. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn’t be voting Republican.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.

But you keep voting for them.
I don’t vote for Republicans, never have, never will. You’re WAY out your depth in this conversation, let the adults talk you might learn something if you take off those partisan blinders and try to be objective for a change……..

What an arrogant little twit you are. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn’t be voting Republican.
Uh-huh, better an “arrogant little twit” than an individual completely devoid of objectivity, integrity, self awareness and the ability to comprehend English.

Apparently you missed the part regarding the relationship between for whom I cast my votes and Republicans.

NOW FEEL FREE TO CARRY ON YOUR NON-STOP, POINTLESS, HYPER-PARTISAN GIBBERISH.
 

Liberals are the biggest dumbasses on the planet. They prove it with the all disastrous things they support like letting other countries export their poverty here. How dumb do you have to be to have open borders? If they is what they are learning with their education system then some teachers need to be fired.
You seem upset by the voting patterns of the best-educated and most prosperous states, but I doubt if any will defer to your insistence they they follow your lead since their approach is obviously working for them.

No one I know of is advocating for your "open borders" as an immigration policy. Some free-market capitalists promote tariff-free commerce in that regard.


You are confused because they are not educated. They do too many stupid Libtard things to be considered educated by any measurement.

They may tell you that they are educated but they are lying to you and you are idiot enough to believe them.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
that is the rub. When the dollar is not longer the reserve currency, prices are gonna go UUUUUPPP. Perhaps China's endgame is for the yuan to be the new dollar. But I don's see why other countries would tie to a currency that is fixed by pols.

But the problem was the gold standard failed to halt the great depression. There's a youtube of Friedman explaining what happened but essentially when one country redeemed another country's money from the other country's gold reserve .... they kept it. In theory, the state with a lot of gold would have their money become overvalued, so they'd buy stuff in other countries with a devalued currency that was cheaper, so that country would get the gold. But it all stopped. And there was no way to start it again.

But with any currency that is not tied to some tangible thing (seashells, tulips, gold whatever) you rightly point out that we can make as much as we want. It's like crack. But you and I can say no to crack, but we're stuck with the deficits.
 


You are confused because they are not educated. They do too many stupid Libtard things to be considered educated by any measurement.

They may tell you that they are educated but they are lying to you and you are idiot enough to believe them.
You seem to lash out at the best-educated, most prosperous states because you are in a snit over their political proclivities.

If you would like to pretend they are other objective criteria confirms, you'll have to cit credible alternative criteria. Your sniveling about them is of negligible value.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
that is the rub. When the dollar is not longer the reserve currency, prices are gonna go UUUUUPPP. Perhaps China's endgame is for the yuan to be the new dollar. But I don's see why other countries would tie to a currency that is fixed by pols.

But the problem was the gold standard failed to halt the great depression. There's a youtube of Friedman explaining what happened but essentially when one country redeemed another country's money from the other country's gold reserve .... they kept it. In theory, the state with a lot of gold would have their money become overvalued, so they'd buy stuff in other countries with a devalued currency that was cheaper, so that country would get the gold. But it all stopped. And there was no way to start it again.

But with any currency that is not tied to some tangible thing (seashells, tulips, gold whatever) you rightly point out that we can make as much as we want. It's like crack. But you and I can say no to crack, but we're stuck with the deficits.
What failed to end the Depression was FDR's government interference


FDR’s Policies Lengthened the 1930’s Depression by ~7 Years

 


You are confused because they are not educated. They do too many stupid Libtard things to be considered educated by any measurement.

They may tell you that they are educated but they are lying to you and you are idiot enough to believe them.
You seem to lash out at the best-educated, most prosperous states because you are in a snit over their political proclivities.

If you would like to pretend they are other objective criteria confirms, you'll have to cit credible alternative criteria. Your sniveling about them is of negligible value.


You are still confused aren't you? How can anybody be "educated" and support Libtard policies that are always a disaster?
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
that is the rub. When the dollar is not longer the reserve currency, prices are gonna go UUUUUPPP. Perhaps China's endgame is for the yuan to be the new dollar. But I don's see why other countries would tie to a currency that is fixed by pols.

But the problem was the gold standard failed to halt the great depression. There's a youtube of Friedman explaining what happened but essentially when one country redeemed another country's money from the other country's gold reserve .... they kept it. In theory, the state with a lot of gold would have their money become overvalued, so they'd buy stuff in other countries with a devalued currency that was cheaper, so that country would get the gold. But it all stopped. And there was no way to start it again.

But with any currency that is not tied to some tangible thing (seashells, tulips, gold whatever) you rightly point out that we can make as much as we want. It's like crack. But you and I can say no to crack, but we're stuck with the deficits.
What failed to end the Depression was FDR's government interference


FDR’s Policies Lengthened the 1930’s Depression by ~7 Years

Hitler and Mussolini succeeded. Strange that.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
that is the rub. When the dollar is not longer the reserve currency, prices are gonna go UUUUUPPP. Perhaps China's endgame is for the yuan to be the new dollar. But I don's see why other countries would tie to a currency that is fixed by pols.

But the problem was the gold standard failed to halt the great depression. There's a youtube of Friedman explaining what happened but essentially when one country redeemed another country's money from the other country's gold reserve .... they kept it. In theory, the state with a lot of gold would have their money become overvalued, so they'd buy stuff in other countries with a devalued currency that was cheaper, so that country would get the gold. But it all stopped. And there was no way to start it again.

But with any currency that is not tied to some tangible thing (seashells, tulips, gold whatever) you rightly point out that we can make as much as we want. It's like crack. But you and I can say no to crack, but we're stuck with the deficits.
Under Bretton Woods, gold was valued at a fixed price to dollars (1 oz: $35), therefore the country with the most gold could print the most currency, each unit still retained the same intrinsic value in relationship to gold and thus the value relationship to all other currencies in the system.

You’re correct though, the gold standard does suffer from liquidity problems always has always will, but fiat currencies suffer from a bigger problem, increasing devaluation risk leading to the return to intrinsic value (0). Which outcome is worse for the citizenry, Depression or hyper-inflation?

Who knows, perhaps crypto will be the way to “start it again”, if we can solve the transaction scalability problems, switch from effort based mining to stake based mining and achieve real psuedonimity of the blockchain ledger. A fully democratized, decentralized currency system, nice idea, huh?
 


You are still confused aren't you? How can anybody be "educated" and support Libtard policies that are always a disaster?
I'll take your inability to provide any data that contradicts that which rates the best-educated and most prosperous states as an admission that you have nothing of substance to offer. You're just pissy about the political orientation of the best-educated and most prosperous states.

If you make sacrifices to your gods that the people of Massachusetts suddenly vote as if they were Mississippians, you are going to be disappointed.
 
That same Constitution that told us what real money was. It is not that there were people not doing well back then. But the taxes were nothing compared to today and the same issues and much worse exist. It is understandable. Poverty and hunger is not a fun thing. Yet it exists here with massive payouts in many ways. So the taxes keep rising in incremental ways. And the issues do not go away.
The Founding Fathers anticipated the inevitable societal changes and designed a democracy wherein succeeding electorates decide their contemporary concerns by electing representative who legislate according to those priorities.
Yes it does. But to subvert it a fiat currency had to installed and it was pushed through by very powerful globalists. Legalized loan sharks who take a cut from every federal reserve note.
I realize Fiat Currency is a popular buzzword, but both the founders and Lincoln gop financed wars with fiat currency
So did the Romans and the practice played a major role in their decline. The fact that mistakes were made in the past doesn’t justify making the same ones in the present.
Well I agree, sort of. But the problem has nothing to do with "fiat currency" and the buzzword of today. We paid our unsecured debts we ran up in wars. The gold standard was responsible for turning a recession into a decade long global depression that was only cured with "fiat money." The problem is leaders willing to vote for crap and tax cuts regardless of budget deficits.
You seem to be forgetting the effects of our dropping Bretton Woods in the early 1970’s and why that agreement existed in the first place. After it was gone the dollar was no longer tied to ANYTHING and since much of the world uses the dollar as their reserve currency guess what their currencies are tied to?

We’re doing the same thing with the dollar that the Romans did to the denarius and for the same reasons (removing spending restraint on the state), the Romans devalued their currency so badly that even the state stopped accepting it for tax payments.
I wasn't forgetting. Bretton Woods and the gold standard caused an outflow of gold
Stop right there, what was the root cause of the net outflow of gold that caused Nixon to abandon Bretton Woods? the oil crisis is irrelevant since it took place after Nixons action.

Second question, how would you explain the rising popularity of crypto for transactions? I ask because it’s directly related to the first question.

hint: what do people do with respect to money when “the jig is up”?

Woof,woof Doggie always good to read your insights.
You're right. While the oil crisis was part of Nixon's motivation that actually predated the oil embargo. We'd reached "peak oil" in domestic production which caused us to import more, and that caused dollars (tied to gold) to go overseas.

And I recall it seemed like a good idea at the time. LOL. I just wanted a job that didn't involve being part of the Vietnam adventure.
By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[7]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[8] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark.[9] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[9] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[9] France acquired $191 million in gold.[9] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[9] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[9] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods.
You captured the gist of question #1, the world figured out that we were CHEATING (printing more dollars than we had gold reserves to back them) on Bretton Woods to pay for the Great Society and the Vietnam War. People being people saw the writing on the wall and wanted gold at the fixed asset price instead of dollars (which is want to happen when they see a devaluation coming). The bullshit excuse that Nixon gave “defend the dollar from the speculators” was just that BULLSHIT, they weren’t “speculators” they knew exactly what was happening. Since then we’ve been on a grand experiment in currencies never before seen in the History of Civilization, fiat currencies tied to another fiat currency, it’s good for us as long as the dollar remains the worlds reserve currency, not so good when that ends.

Crypto is a symptom of the same problem, fiat currencies return to their intrinsic value when the illusion cracks and nobody wants to be in them when it does, the cracks, they’re starting to show. All it will take is one major economy (for example CHINA) to dump their dollar reserves and the dominoes will fall.
that is the rub. When the dollar is not longer the reserve currency, prices are gonna go UUUUUPPP. Perhaps China's endgame is for the yuan to be the new dollar. But I don's see why other countries would tie to a currency that is fixed by pols.

But the problem was the gold standard failed to halt the great depression. There's a youtube of Friedman explaining what happened but essentially when one country redeemed another country's money from the other country's gold reserve .... they kept it. In theory, the state with a lot of gold would have their money become overvalued, so they'd buy stuff in other countries with a devalued currency that was cheaper, so that country would get the gold. But it all stopped. And there was no way to start it again.

But with any currency that is not tied to some tangible thing (seashells, tulips, gold whatever) you rightly point out that we can make as much as we want. It's like crack. But you and I can say no to crack, but we're stuck with the deficits.
Under Bretton Woods, gold was valued at a fixed price to dollars (1 oz: $35), therefore the country with the most gold could print the most currency, each unit still retained the same intrinsic value in relationship to gold and thus the value relationship to all other currencies in the system.

You’re correct though, the gold standard does suffer from liquidity problems always has always will, but fiat currencies suffer from a bigger problem, increasing devaluation risk leading to the return to intrinsic value (0). Which outcome is worse for the citizenry, Depression or hyper-inflation?

Who knows, perhaps crypto will be the way to “start it again”, if we can solve the transaction scalability problems, switch from effort based mining to stake based mining and achieve real psuedonimity of the blockchain ledger. A fully democratized, decentralized currency system, nice idea, huh?
Well we learned that the answer to hyperinflation is to just hike rates till there is no demand for goods. Of course that means a lot lose jobs. Reagan's first term was no dance in the candlelight. lol And we do in theory act in concert with other national banks. China ... not.

Since 1996 or so our problem really has been bubble markets. Or rampant speculation. Or too many dollars in search of an investment. Or insufficient consumer demand to get our output to rise. I don't really see gold or monetarism as an answer to that. In the 1970's the fed set rates to get full employment. Now it looks at inflation too.

The gop's answer was a tax cut both in 2000 and 2016. How that was supposed to work always seemed illogical to me since the rich folks with the money to invest got more of it when there was already a glut (see bubble markets), and the workers were just buying stuff on credit. Trump had this unique theory that 1970 industrial jobs that are now automated would make a comeback, and we'd pay people in the US 5-6 times what people in asia will do the same job for. Not surprisingly, it failed.

The dems seem to have stumbled onto a plan because of covid. For a number of reasons that no one really say which is more important, there are fewer US workers now. Probably extended UI benefits. But the workforce aged, and some retired. We don't have the illegal immigrants. And people are seeing wages go up because of demand for labor, so they quit one job to get another. And during the pandemic we didn't have the usual job attrition of people leaving jobs, so there may be just pent up demand to "take this job and shove it."

I really don't know. I thought the democrat centrists were not all wrong in making sure workers had educ for their kids, and HC and retirement simply by taxing rich folks (who have an excess of investment money) so workers would use their own pay to buy more stuff. Which not coincidentally would me the investor class would find investments to make this stuff. But that seems to be unpopular even more with the workers than with the investors. I did read that there's some call to make all employers fund employee 401ks.
 
Last edited:
The 3rd world will break Americas Medicaid

That is silly, because people don't intentionally get sick or injured, just to get Medicaid.
If the 3rd world countries were not run by US owned military juntas, then they would all already have good health care and not need to come to the US.
 
In the richest nation on earth. That’s a lot of poor suffering Americans.

What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a ‘High-Water Mark’
That's really quite incredible. Less than 150M working people out of 330M have to pay for their own health care and also these 80M others' health care.

A family of two has to pay for the health care of three.
It’s actually worse than that, my spouse works at a health care provider and the problems that they are having with Medicaid patients overconsumption of service are causing massive problems with their practice. They routinely schedule appointments and don’t show, they schedule appointments and show up not for treatment but just expecting prescriptions, they refuse to follow treatment plans, they abuse the system in every way possible. Of course that doesn’t mean that all Medicaid patients are like that but it’s reached such epidemic proportions that it’s costing too much money and causing problems seeing other patients that the practice is considering just dropping their contracts with Medicaid, they can’t afford it anymore and it’s negatively impacting all the other private insurance and Medicare patients.

So the bottom line is, the taxpayers aren’t just paying for the Medicaid patients to get treatment, they’re paying for all the WASTE that Medicaid patients are incurring along with paying for getting worse service. Of course Medicaid is administer by the State so this will vary from State to State but I suspect it’s pretty wide spread.
This is the fault of government. Their failure to properly manage and control the program allows people to abuse it.
That’s a big part of it, the lions share of the problem comes from the fact that when you make a good or service “free” for the consumer, over-consumption and thus market failures inevitably follow.

Nah, no one is going out and breaking a leg just so they can get a cast for free.
The problem is over charging providers because insurance companies like high provider charges because that forces people to need to buy insurance even more.
 

Forum List

Back
Top