70% of those infected with Kung Flu wore masks, followed CDC guidelines.

[Concerned American]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

You sound like Fauci, the CDC/WHO/DNC You COULD get covid and POTENTIALLY die if the third blue moon of the year fall on Friday the 13th. But if you wear a mask, you COULD POTENTIALLY save some old codgers life. How about this. Come up with some actual SCIENCE and not just a bunch of moronic democrat governors and reps saying science and you will get some factual WILL, DOES verbs. For crying out loud. WA governor Jay Inslee was on the news last night saying "Because of the NEW science and because we are doing so well, we will be opening our schools." C'mon, Jay, you moron. We've been locked down with mask mandates for a month and a half now and cases are still spiking. How about that NEW science.

No I sound like a guy who has chronic asthma and who listens to Doctors he knows and trusts.

I have among my friends 2 ER docs and a retired infectious disease dr/ pathologist who know a **** of a lot more than you do

I'll call your 4 docs and raise you 5. Take it down the road moron.

it 3 doctors you see where I used the slash mark?

and those 3 people know a **** of a lot more than you.

You don't know ****-all about me moron. I do know that you are a sheep that will hide in his basement because the MSM/DNC has overhyped a disease that is less deadly than the seasonal flu.

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

I wonder why people working with viruses in a lab where there are no coughing or sneezing people wear hermeticaly-sealed suits?

why do you suppose? let's see how smart you really are.

Okay...

https://i.ibb.co/2vHLvYY/masks03.jpg

 

[jc456]

I wonder why people working with viruses in a lab where there are no coughing or sneezing people wear hermeticaly-sealed suits?

why do you suppose? let's see how smart you really are.

Okay...

https://i.ibb.co/2vHLvYY/masks03.jpg

not sure how that answers the question I asked. What you just posted shows wearing masks don't work.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

I wonder why people working with viruses in a lab where there are no coughing or sneezing people wear hermeticaly-sealed suits?

why do you suppose? let's see how smart you really are.

Okay...

https://i.ibb.co/2vHLvYY/masks03.jpg

not sure how that answers the question I asked. What you just posted shows wearing masks don't work.

Right. According to my original reply, which you quoted and seems pretty clear, it's why they wear hermetically-sealed suits.

 

[Blues Man]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

But the onus should be on the vulnerable person.

it's really not that onerous to wear a mask in a store.

it's a minor inconvenience at best

How's the view of that lemming in front of you?

you do know that whole lemming over the cliff thing is a myth don't you?

Not in your case. Answer the question, how's that view.

The question is irrelevant because lemmings do not run off cliffs.

Your blanket statement is false. Do some research, they do, on occasion of overpopulation (every 3 or 4 years according to Animal Planet) run off of cliffs and swim out to sea resulting in death. Geez, I am getting tired of educating you morons. Look it up and GET FACTS, not poll numbers to make a point. So, it is not irrelevant, How's the view?

Lemmings Jumping Off Cliffs En Masse Is a Myth

Lemmings don't commit mass suicide as is popularly believed, but they are aggressive and have even been known to charge larger predators.

animals.howstuffworks.com

The truth is, their reputation for jumping off sea cliffs en masse is a myth.

 

[Bobob]

Where do you get your info from? Certainly not from the medical profession or news sources.

Search Results
Web results
COVID-19 Hospitalizations Hit Record Highs. Where ... - NPR
www.npr.org › sections › health-shots › 2020/11/10 › co...
Nov 10, 2020 — Seriously ill COVID-19 patients are starting to fill up hospital beds in record ... With the virus now surging across the country, experts warn that the impact ... COVID-19 patients can be more labor intensive because health care ...


“Excess Death” Data Point to Pandemic's True Toll | CDC
www.cdc.gov › cdcresponse › accomplishments › exces...
Oct 27, 2020 — Since the pandemic began, Lauren and a team at NCHS have been developing ways to make sure those numbers are available rapidly and are ...

read the Excess Death material and no where does it state the average death rate increased. Now I may have missed it and you can merely pull that data from the link to prove me wrong. So please, show me from that link where the average death rate increased from the decades known count? Please show me your brilliance.

The death rate from this disease has increased dramatically and that is the point of this discussion.
If you want to dance, then dance.

then why can't you show the death rate change figures?

I speak of the death rate increase from the Covid virus and nothing else.

Where do you get your info from? Certainly not from the medical profession or news sources.

Search Results
Web results
COVID-19 Hospitalizations Hit Record Highs. Where ... - NPR
www.npr.org › sections › health-shots › 2020/11/10 › co...
Nov 10, 2020 — Seriously ill COVID-19 patients are starting to fill up hospital beds in record ... With the virus now surging across the country, experts warn that the impact ... COVID-19 patients can be more labor intensive because health care ...


“Excess Death” Data Point to Pandemic's True Toll | CDC
www.cdc.gov › cdcresponse › accomplishments › exces...
Oct 27, 2020 — Since the pandemic began, Lauren and a team at NCHS have been developing ways to make sure those numbers are available rapidly and are ...

read the Excess Death material and no where does it state the average death rate increased. Now I may have missed it and you can merely pull that data from the link to prove me wrong. So please, show me from that link where the average death rate increased from the decades known count? Please show me your brilliance.

The death rate from this disease has increased dramatically and that is the point of this discussion.
If you want to dance, then dance.

then why can't you show the death rate change figures?

SHOTS - HEALTH NEWS
Coronavirus Is Surging: How Severe Is Your State's Outbreak?
December 22, 2020 • View NPR's maps and graphics to see where COVID-19 is hitting hardest in the U.S., which state outbreaks are growing and which are leveling off.

 

[Blues Man]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

You sound like Fauci, the CDC/WHO/DNC You COULD get covid and POTENTIALLY die if the third blue moon of the year fall on Friday the 13th. But if you wear a mask, you COULD POTENTIALLY save some old codgers life. How about this. Come up with some actual SCIENCE and not just a bunch of moronic democrat governors and reps saying science and you will get some factual WILL, DOES verbs. For crying out loud. WA governor Jay Inslee was on the news last night saying "Because of the NEW science and because we are doing so well, we will be opening our schools." C'mon, Jay, you moron. We've been locked down with mask mandates for a month and a half now and cases are still spiking. How about that NEW science.

No I sound like a guy who has chronic asthma and who listens to Doctors he knows and trusts.

I have among my friends 2 ER docs and a retired infectious disease dr/ pathologist who know a **** of a lot more than you do

I'll call your 4 docs and raise you 5. Take it down the road moron.

it 3 doctors you see where I used the slash mark?

and those 3 people know a **** of a lot more than you.

You don't know ****-all about me moron. I do know that you are a sheep that will hide in his basement because the MSM/DNC has overhyped a disease that is less deadly than the seasonal flu.

I go out every day.

I walk my dogs in the state forest, I go to the supermarket twice a week, I go to play guitar with some buddies at least twice a week.

And any virus that causes a respiratory infection can become serious for me because as I said I have chronic asthma.

So i take precautions. I get a flu shot , I'll get the COVID vaccine too.

 

[dudmuck]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

 

[Concerned American]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

You sound like Fauci, the CDC/WHO/DNC You COULD get covid and POTENTIALLY die if the third blue moon of the year fall on Friday the 13th. But if you wear a mask, you COULD POTENTIALLY save some old codgers life. How about this. Come up with some actual SCIENCE and not just a bunch of moronic democrat governors and reps saying science and you will get some factual WILL, DOES verbs. For crying out loud. WA governor Jay Inslee was on the news last night saying "Because of the NEW science and because we are doing so well, we will be opening our schools." C'mon, Jay, you moron. We've been locked down with mask mandates for a month and a half now and cases are still spiking. How about that NEW science.

No I sound like a guy who has chronic asthma and who listens to Doctors he knows and trusts.

I have among my friends 2 ER docs and a retired infectious disease dr/ pathologist who know a **** of a lot more than you do

I'll call your 4 docs and raise you 5. Take it down the road moron.

it 3 doctors you see where I used the slash mark?

and those 3 people know a **** of a lot more than you.

You don't know ****-all about me moron. I do know that you are a sheep that will hide in his basement because the MSM/DNC has overhyped a disease that is less deadly than the seasonal flu.

I go out every day.

I walk my dogs in the state forest, I go to the supermarket twice a week, I go to play guitar with some buddies at least twice a week.

And any virus that causes a respiratory infection can become serious for me because as I said I have chronic asthma.

So i take precautions. I get a flu shot , I'll get the COVID vaccine too.

Good, I'm glad for you. May you live long and prosper. I will continue to live a life as free of government intervention as I can. That includes refusing any and all democrat elitist mandates that they pass on the populace and refuse to follow themselves. See Piglosi, Newsom, Cuomo, Whitmer, Lightfoot, Inslee...

 

[Concerned American]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

Democrats throwing around the word "science" HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

But the onus should be on the vulnerable person.

it's really not that onerous to wear a mask in a store.

it's a minor inconvenience at best

How's the view of that lemming in front of you?

you do know that whole lemming over the cliff thing is a myth don't you?

No, it’s true. They just changed the name to democrats.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

But the onus should be on the vulnerable person.

it's really not that onerous to wear a mask in a store.

it's a minor inconvenience at best

How's the view of that lemming in front of you?

you do know that whole lemming over the cliff thing is a myth don't you?

Not in your case. Answer the question, how's that view.

The question is irrelevant because lemmings do not run off cliffs.

Democrats do.

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

Democrats throwing around the word "science" HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!

dude, right? science supposes facts which demofks can't stand.

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

 

[dudmuck]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

"may be" is used in the context of how masks reduce the virus exhaled by infected people. There is no question as to whether masks reduce an infected wearer from spreading the virus, the only question is precisely how its achieved.
If you read more than just the one sentence i coped, then you'd know that.

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

"may be" is used in the context of how masks reduce the virus exhaled by infected people. There is no question as to whether masks reduce an infected wearer from spreading the virus, the only question is precisely how its achieved.
If you read more than just the one sentence i coped, then you'd know that.

what do you mean there is no question? the fk there is, that fact is you can't prove it. I aske for your evidence and you use a phrse like 'may be' then you don't even know what the phrase means. it means there isn't any evidence. none nada zip. and yet here you are promoting 'may be' I'm still laughing you tried to justify that phrase as fact.

 

[dudmuck]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

"may be" is used in the context of how masks reduce the virus exhaled by infected people. There is no question as to whether masks reduce an infected wearer from spreading the virus, the only question is precisely how its achieved.
If you read more than just the one sentence i coped, then you'd know that.

what do you mean there is no question? the fk there is, that fact is you can't prove it. I aske for your evidence and you use a phrse like 'may be' then you don't even know what the phrase means. it means there isn't any evidence. none nada zip. and yet here you are promoting 'may be' I'm still laughing you tried to justify that phrase as fact.

at the web-site I already provided:

But health experts say the evidence is clear that masks can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and that the more people wearing masks, the better.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

see the section
What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

"may be" is used in the context of how masks reduce the virus exhaled by infected people. There is no question as to whether masks reduce an infected wearer from spreading the virus, the only question is precisely how its achieved.
If you read more than just the one sentence i coped, then you'd know that.

what do you mean there is no question? the fk there is, that fact is you can't prove it. I aske for your evidence and you use a phrse like 'may be' then you don't even know what the phrase means. it means there isn't any evidence. none nada zip. and yet here you are promoting 'may be' I'm still laughing you tried to justify that phrase as fact.

at the web-site I already provided:

But health experts say the evidence is clear that masks can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and that the more people wearing masks, the better.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

see the section
What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?

well before I go read, why didn't you pull the phrase out and quote it here? Don't you schmucks know how to do that?

 

[jc456]

My experience suggests the best way to avoid catching Wuhan is to avoid indoor gatherings.
I travel all around the country as a side job and play bar music as a primary job. Almost all gigs canceled in 2020 but I’ve continued traveling on the other job. For over 30 years I’ve never gone this far into the season without having contracted at least a cold by now. Not this year. Process of elimination suggests the indoor events are the culprit.
Of course all of this should be moot by now as we should have naturally been over this already. But democrat gov’s and their lockdowns are only delaying the process.

It only stands to reason that isolation will nearly eliminate most communicable diseases. However if it becomes a matter of course, eventually everyone will lose their herd immunity and you will see mass die offs due to minor disease. Don't be naive and fall for all of this "end of the world" garbage. Go on with your life, the sky is not falling and this is just so much sensationalized crap.

You can go ahead and live your life while at least trying to minimize risk of getting COVID.

I'm not a shut in but I take precautions. I have had asthma since i was a kid and don't want to risk getting a potentially severe pulmonary infection

There is a vulnerable population, of which you are a member. You take necessary precautions, as you should. The vast majority of the population is not fatally vulnerable and will recover just as they would with a common cold or flu. Please , do keep yourself safe. Merry Christmas.

you do realize that if you follow some simple precautions as well that you could possible prevent a vulnerable person from getting sick and possibly dying right?

you have zero evidence to make that statement. none, nada, zip.

BTW, the missing evidence is what I want to see. please provide it. help us out.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

can you read your own fking post? two big fking words in that title. " may be" do you know what those two words mean? hahahahahahahahahahaha you fail on your own post. The mere fact you use that as your guidance is my evidence you don't know shit. Everyday, every demofk post, they fail with their own words. just once would it hurt for a demofk to be honest, it would be nice. They can't scrape up any evidence yet scream from the cliff.

"may be" is used in the context of how masks reduce the virus exhaled by infected people. There is no question as to whether masks reduce an infected wearer from spreading the virus, the only question is precisely how its achieved.
If you read more than just the one sentence i coped, then you'd know that.

what do you mean there is no question? the fk there is, that fact is you can't prove it. I aske for your evidence and you use a phrse like 'may be' then you don't even know what the phrase means. it means there isn't any evidence. none nada zip. and yet here you are promoting 'may be' I'm still laughing you tried to justify that phrase as fact.

at the web-site I already provided:

But health experts say the evidence is clear that masks can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and that the more people wearing masks, the better.

Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

see the section
What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?

dude, seriously?

But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”

Drop my mthr fking mic. I'm laughing.
you know what the evidence of nature is? when women exposed their babies to mumps and chicken pops. Community herding. it's worked for centuries. now some **** comes along and says experiment of nature is masks? LOL.