7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:
 
This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.
The above is all true of course but misses the essential point which is that liberals simply lack the IQ to understand how freedom works and therefore believe in magical government just like little children believe in Santa Claus.
 
First, did it truly not cross your mind to credit the actual author/publisher of the remarks in the OP? (Unless, of course, you are the owner of Townhall.com, which holds the copyright to content published on its site.)

3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

This is rich coming in an age when the GOP POTUS -- before and after becoming POTUS -- puts his image ahead of all else. What the hell? The man is so concerned about his ego and image that he refused to attend both the Gridiron and WHPC roasts.

I can't say that liberals don't care about image, but I can say they don't appear to care about it any more or less than do conservatives, especially Republicans.

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about
5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals.
6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?

Something wrong like:
  • Being unable to get a decent job where one is and with the skills one possesses and rather than either moving or developing new skills, one just complains about it and waits for a "savior" to make someone else give them a job?
  • Blaming someone else, rather than looking in the mirror, for everything that's not gone as one would have wanted?
  • Taking credit for things whereof one made no substantive contribution to effecting them?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not liberals who are complaining about why they cannot get jobs and are blaming everyone and everything except themselves for that being so. The harbingers of what kinds of skills one needed to have to obtain and keep a good job in the 21st century have been around for some 20+ years. It's nobody's fault but one's own that one didn't heed them and obtain those skills, or move to where the skills one possesses are sufficiently in demand that one can get a "decent" job as a result of having them.

Conservatives, especially the ones who form the core of Trump's support base, want the world changed -- back to what it was some 50 or so years ago -- to suit them and their inadequacies rather than independently, as individuals, taking steps to thrive in the world that is. There's a reason so many liberals are on the coasts and in big cities: that's where good jobs and opportunities are most readily available.

want the world changed -- back to what it was some 50 or so years ago

So the liberals don't want high taxes? I am xonufsex.

Do they?
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
whassamatter, loser? You don't want to tak about Israel's election anymore? :lmao:

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



So so many links I have ...well you and fat Ed zero....



Obama Is Pursuing Regime Change in Israel

Canada.....

FOUND! Obama’s boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt


FOUND! Obama's boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt



With no laws on their books to prevent it from happening, top Barack Hussein Obama campaign aides are masterminding anti Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu and anti Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper 2015 election campaigns.




:dance:
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



So so many links I have ...well you and fat Ed zero....



Obama Is Pursuing Regime Change in Israel

Canada.....

FOUND! Obama’s boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt


FOUND! Obama's boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt



With no laws on their books to prevent it from happening, top Barack Hussein Obama campaign aides are masterminding anti Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu and anti Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper 2015 election campaigns.




:dance:
I have zero links? Just how ******* deranged are you? I just included a link in my last post even. Not just any link, but thee link. The link to the Senate report that almost every one of your links references as their source.

:dance:
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
whassamatter, loser? You don't want to tak about Israel's election anymore? :lmao:

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.
:dance:



Again that wasn't the question Obama cock holster...



What's this Obama your dear leader also messed with the French elections in 2012? Say it ain't so joe



Wikileaks Exposes CIA Involvement In French 2012 Presidential Election | Zero Hedge



The 7 pages of documents reveal that all major French political parties "were targeted for infiltration by the CIA's human ("HUMINT") and electronic ("SIGINT") spies in the seven months leading up to France's 2012 presidential election."



:dance:
 
Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



So so many links I have ...well you and fat Ed zero....



Obama Is Pursuing Regime Change in Israel

Canada.....

FOUND! Obama’s boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt


FOUND! Obama's boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt



With no laws on their books to prevent it from happening, top Barack Hussein Obama campaign aides are masterminding anti Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu and anti Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper 2015 election campaigns.




:dance:
I have zero links? Just how ******* deranged are you? I just included a link in my last post even. Not just any link, but thee link. The link to the Senate report that almost every one of your links references as their source.

:dance:


What are you yapping about ! All you post is Obama and his hence men got away with it zzzzzzzzz


Yet the facts remain Obama meddled in isreals election...




:dance:
 
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



So so many links I have ...well you and fat Ed zero....



Obama Is Pursuing Regime Change in Israel

Canada.....

FOUND! Obama’s boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt


FOUND! Obama's boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt



With no laws on their books to prevent it from happening, top Barack Hussein Obama campaign aides are masterminding anti Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu and anti Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper 2015 election campaigns.




:dance:
I have zero links? Just how ******* deranged are you? I just included a link in my last post even. Not just any link, but thee link. The link to the Senate report that almost every one of your links references as their source.

:dance:


What are you yapping about ! All you post is Obama and his hence men got away with it zzzzzzzzz


Yet the facts remain Obama meddled in isreals election...




:dance:

.


Who the hell is this slim fast billionaire guy?


Slim Fast Billionaire, Obama, State Department, V15 to oust Netanyahu from power



Slim Fast Billionaire, Obama, State Department, V15 to oust Netanyahu from power




One Voice,a PAC, a UN NGO, states on their website that they are a partner of the US State Department and have received hefty sums of money from alleged US donors to overthrow and defeat Netanyahu and establish a two state solution for middle east peace. One Voice solicits money on a grand scale to create “social and political” change all over the world.

On the ground in Israel according to Harretz, a popular newspaper in Israel has discovered that Jeremy Bird , a 2012 field officer for the Obama election campaign that tried to turn Texas blue with “Battle Ground Texas”, a PAC formed by Obama for President.

Bird has been busy as late in Israel working with One Voice, it’s many American Donors, to include Slim Fast billionaire S. Daniel Abraham to solidify votes against Netanyahu with old fashioned Western Political know how.



:dance:
.
 
Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



So so many links I have ...well you and fat Ed zero....



Obama Is Pursuing Regime Change in Israel

Canada.....

FOUND! Obama’s boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt


FOUND! Obama's boots on the ground in Israel, Canada and Egypt



With no laws on their books to prevent it from happening, top Barack Hussein Obama campaign aides are masterminding anti Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu and anti Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper 2015 election campaigns.




:dance:
I have zero links? Just how ******* deranged are you? I just included a link in my last post even. Not just any link, but thee link. The link to the Senate report that almost every one of your links references as their source.

:dance:


More interesting news...




Attention has been focused on V15 after a bipartisan US Senate subcommittee criticized the State Department for giving a $350,000 grant to OneVoice, which became V15 and latter changed its name to dahstsu??
 
Oh look what one voice and V15 did was also legal in isreal, it don't change the fact Obama medeled tards


American-funded anti-Netanyahu group acted legally, Israel's watchdog rules


Legally, Israel's Watchdog Rules

Despite Netanyahu's claims, V15's activities did not constitute illegal campaign contribution to Israeli left, says comptroller, but right wing rally held two days before elections was.

Jonathan Lis
18.10.2016 | 16:49

The state watchdog ruled Tuesday that V15, an American-funded organization seeking to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the last election, acted legally, despite claims to the contrary by government officials.



V15 partnered with New York-based group OneVoice – whichreceived State Department funding to promote the peace process – to recruit thousands of volunteers to go door to door during the winter 2015 election campaign. V15, which tried to convince Israelis to vote to change the Likud-led government, was also funded by Jewish-American businessman S. Daniel Abraham.

...


In July, a U.S. Senate investigative committee found that the State Department had indirectly funded V15 via OneVoice.


After the project ended when peace talks foundered in April 2014, OneVoice changed tack. In late 2014, a few weeks after Netanyahu declared a new election, OneVoice gave V15 the database it had developed with State Department funding.


.:dance::dance::dance::dance:
.
 
xonufsexXelor, post: 17326831, member: 60905"]
First, did it truly not cross your mind to credit the actual author/publisher of the remarks in the OP? (Unless, of course, you are the owner of Townhall.com, which holds the copyright to content published on its site.)

3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

This is rich coming in an age when the GOP POTUS -- before and after becoming POTUS -- puts his image ahead of all else. What the hell? The man is so concerned about his ego and image that he refused to attend both the Gridiron and WHPC roasts.

I can't say that liberals don't care about image, but I can say they don't appear to care about it any more or less than do conservatives, especially Republicans.

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about
5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals.
6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?

Something wrong like:
  • Being unable to get a decent job where one is and with the skills one possesses and rather than either moving or developing new skills, one just complains about it and waits for a "savior" to make someone else give them a job?
  • Blaming someone else, rather than looking in the mirror, for everything that's not gone as one would have wanted?
  • Taking credit for things whereof one made no substantive contribution to effecting them?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not liberals who are complaining about why they cannot get jobs and are blaming everyone and everything except themselves for that being so. The harbingers of what kinds of skills one needed to have to obtain and keep a good job in the 21st century have been around for some 20+ years. It's nobody's fault but one's own that one didn't heed them and obtain those skills, or move to where the skills one possesses are sufficiently in demand that one can get a "decent" job as a result of having them.

Conservatives, especially the ones who form the core of Trump's support base, want the world changed -- back to what it was some 50 or so years ago -- to suit them and their inadequacies rather than independently, as individuals, taking steps to thrive in the world that is. There's a reason so many liberals are on the coasts and in big cities: that's where good jobs and opportunities are most readily available.

want the world changed -- back to what it was some 50 or so years ago

So the liberals don't want high taxes? I am xonufsex.

Do they?[/QUOTE]


xonufsex



Do you think it's funny changing quotes prick?
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



The president himself, you tired of being a cock holder for Obama yet ?





:dance:
 
Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”




:dance: :dance: :dance:


.
And yet, your own source which investigated those charges says otherwise...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

:dance:


This reminds me remember when your Messiah blabbed about isreals nukes?
He betrayed an ally....



Just cause ...


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less


president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.





:dance:
Speaking of outing Israel's secret nuclear arsenal... what did Obama reveal that the Bush administration didn't already expose...??

George Bush's own Secretary of Defense in 2006, speaking about Iran while being confirmed...

MR. GATES: No, I don’t think he’s kidding. And -- but I think that there are, in fact, higher powers in Iran than he, than the president. And I think that while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for a nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons -- Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west, and us in the Persian Gulf --

The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates

:dance:

You never tire of losing, do ya, loser?



And screw you, I am not going to read that entire thing to see if your lying again





:dance:
 
15th post
president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.
LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]
 
president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.
LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]


Who is lying once again..Obama snitched to the world on a trusted ally


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less



Every president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war


:dance:
 
president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.
LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]


Who is lying once again..
You as always!
 
president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war.

It remained that way until February 2015 when President Obama revealed that Israel did indeed have nuclear weapons.
LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]


Who is lying once again..Obama snitched to the world on a trusted ally


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less



Every president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war


:dance:



Obama snitched, no one knew what they really had.


Obama Release Of Secret Report On Israel Nukes Betrays Ally


Of course, Israel's nuclear prowess is an open secret. But the details have heretofore been largely unknown — something that's called "constructive ambiguity" in nuclear diplomacy. Keep your enemy guessing.


Now that Obama snitched the world knows they have as greatest nuke technology as us..


It turns out isreal might have the hydrogen bomb, no one expected that in the world


The truth about Israel's secret nuclear arsenal



 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom