7 Animals Raping Toddlers In Mall Bathroom...


And they had the audacity to film it. One more reason to expand the use of the death penalty...
Cut their dicks off. Cauterize the resulting mess. Then drop them off in the middle of a large desert with no supplies.
 
We all know this will never happen...

If you are found guilty of sexually abusing a minor, or you are found guilty of knowingly, willingly and intentionally killing someone it should be an automatic death penalty.

If you're found guilty of either of those there should be no appeals, no death row, no nuthouse. Just execution within 48 hours of the conviction.

And I also do not think it should be up to states. It should be a federal level thing. No state should be able to decide if they have a death penalty.

A year of that and you'll see a big drop in child diddlers and murders.
 
If you are found guilty of sexually abusing a minor, or you are found guilty of knowingly, willingly and intentionally killing someone it should be an automatic death penalty.

If you're found guilty of either of those there should be no appeals, no death row, no nuthouse. Just execution within 48 hours of the conviction.

And I also do not think it should be up to states. It should be a federal level thing. No state should be able to decide if they have a death penalty.

A year of that and you'll see a big drop in child diddlers and murders.
No way those in DC would pen thier own death warrants...
 
Cut their dicks off. Cauterize the resulting mess. Then drop them off in the middle of a large desert with no supplies.

No.

Too costly and time consuming.

They should be executed in a quick, clean and humane manner. They should just simply executed and removed from society with no emotion involved. They should be put down the same as a mad dog.

Honestly I say a guillotine made of stainless steel in a stainless steel room. Hose it down after, keep it sharp and oiled. It would be quick, very little cost to maintain and simple to do.
 
If you are found guilty of sexually abusing a minor, or you are found guilty of knowingly, willingly and intentionally killing someone it should be an automatic death penalty.

If you're found guilty of either of those there should be no appeals, no death row, no nuthouse. Just execution within 48 hours of the conviction.

And I also do not think it should be up to states. It should be a federal level thing. No state should be able to decide if they have a death penalty.

A year of that and you'll see a big drop in child diddlers and murders.

Can't support this. Way too many people have been wrongfully convicted of this. With child sex abuse, you're guilty until proven innocent. A child who is mad at her step dad for not buying her a new Iphone accuses him of rape. He is arrested and charged accordingly. There is no evidence other than this little girl who is mad. The prosecutor offers a 10 year plea deal. The guy says I didn't do it. Do you think putting a crying 10yo on the stand is going to make this man look innocent? Juries ALWAYS error on the side of guilty in these types of cases, even with weak or non-existent evidence.

It's also very common for pissed off spouses to coerce their children into saying their other parent abused them, so they can obtain full custody.

Sorry, I am not EVER for the death penalty, especially with non-death resulting crimes. A study found that as many as 35% of all child abuse allegations are false.

 
Last edited:
Can't support this. Way too many people have been wrongfully convicted of this. With child sex abuse, you're guilty until proven innocent. A child who is mad at her step dad for not buying her a new Iphone accuses him of rape. He is arrested and charged accordingly. There is no evidence other than this little girl who is mad. The prosecutor offers a 10 year plea deal. The guy says I didn't do it. Do you think putting a crying 10yo on the stand is going to make this man look innocent?

Sorry, I am not EVER for the death penalty, especially with non-death resulting crimes. A study found that as many as 35% of all child abuse allegations are false.

They filmed themselves doing it. There is no question of guilt...
 
They filmed themselves doing it. There is no question of guilt...

Yes, they did but that's not the quote I was replying to. The quote I replied to says simply "If you are found guilty of sexually abusing a minor." It didn't say "only if it was caught on video." So my point is as many as 1 out of every 3 people accused is a false accusation. That is FAR BEYOND any reasonable amount to warrant a death penalty.
 
Last edited:
Can't support this. Way too many people have been wrongfully convicted of this. With child sex abuse, you're guilty until proven innocent. A child who is mad at her step dad for not buying her a new Iphone accuses him of rape. He is arrested and charged accordingly. There is no evidence other than this little girl who is mad. The prosecutor offers a 10 year plea deal. The guy says I didn't do it. Do you think putting a crying 10yo on the stand is going to make this man look innocent? Juries ALWAYS error on the side of guilty in these types of cases, even with weak or non-existent evidence.

It's also very common for pissed off spouses to coerce their children into saying their other parent abused them, so they can obtain full custody.

Sorry, I am not EVER for the death penalty, especially with non-death resulting crimes. A study found that as many as 35% of all child abuse allegations are false.


That's why I said found guilty. Not simply accused, not simply charged, I said found guilty.

That means you go to court, there is evidence of some sort, a witness, something that gives the court reason to find you guilty.

And there is a hell of a lot of good reason to execute for a non death related crime like banging children. Banging a kid will ruin them for life, it can ruin a families life, and so on.

Not to mention a pedophile is way worse than a murder. A pedophile is someone who doesn't just not value human life they don't value the life of a child. This is a person who will sexually abuse a child, the weakest and most vulnerable person around. A pedophile is the worst kind of criminal because if they will rape a child they have truly abandoned decency, sanity, morality. They can never, ever be a part of a functioning society.

Even if you put a pedophile in prison for life you're still executing them. Only difference is you're killing them with prison. So why waste decades worth of time, energy, resources, money and manpower to execute them slowly with time when you can just do it and get it over with?

Maybe I understand it better than you because I had a incident with a pedophile when I was a kid.
 
That's why I said found guilty. Not simply accused, not simply charged, I said found guilty.

That means you go to court, there is evidence of some sort, a witness, something that gives the court reason to find you guilty.

And there is a hell of a lot of good reason to execute for a non death related crime like banging children. Banging a kid will ruin them for life, it can ruin a families life, and so on.

Not to mention a pedophile is way worse than a murder. A pedophile is someone who doesn't just not value human life they don't value the life of a child. This is a person who will sexually abuse a child, the weakest and most vulnerable person around. A pedophile is the worst kind of criminal because if they will rape a child they have truly abandoned decency, sanity, morality. They can never, ever be a part of a functioning society.

Even if you put a pedophile in prison for life you're still executing them. Only difference is you're killing them with prison. So why waste decades worth of time, energy, resources, money and manpower to execute them slowly with time when you can just do it and get it over with?

Maybe I understand it better than you because I had a incident with a pedophile when I was a kid.

That's what I'm saying. Up to 35% of people FOUND GUILTY of child abuse have not done anything. They plea out for fear of getting decades in prison even if they didn't do it. Juries find them guilty after viewing a crying 10yo little girl on the stand, of course with her hair in pigtails, to make her look even more innocent. What jury is going to look at her on the stand balling her eyes out and say "This guy is innocent?" NONE. VERY FEW who go to trial are found innocent. How many rapists have been exonerated with DNA? WAY TOO MANY.

This lawyers website gives advice on how to prove innocence when falsely accused. PROVE INNOCENCE? What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Even lawyers know better.


People don't want to hear it, but it's been proven time and time again that child sex abusers have the LOWEST recidivism rate of ALL crimes except murder, and that's because most murderers never get released. Stranger danger is also now known as a myth. Your child is more likely to be struck by lightening than harmed by a stranger or even a sex offender living nearby.

I was molested by my grandfather when I was 6 and falsely accused of molesting a neighborhood girl when i was 14 because she wanted me to kiss her while I babysat her and I refused. So I've also been on BOTH sides of the coin as well.
 
Last edited:
If you are found guilty of sexually abusing a minor, or you are found guilty of knowingly, willingly and intentionally killing someone it should be an automatic death penalty.

If you're found guilty of either of those there should be no appeals, no death row, no nuthouse. Just execution within 48 hours of the conviction.

And I also do not think it should be up to states. It should be a federal level thing. No state should be able to decide if they have a death penalty.

A year of that and you'll see a big drop in child diddlers and murders.
What if you get convicted despite the fact that you’re totally innocent?
 

Forum List

Back
Top