63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

[Political Junky]

Why did George W. Bush lie when he said there were no WMD in Iraq?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_A77N5WKWM]Bush admits that Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Liability]

According to WikiLeaks, small amounts of chemical WMDs were found in Iraq and continued to surface for years after the 2003 US invasion.

100% of rderp is a dumbass.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Why did George W. Bush lie when he said there were no WMD in Iraq?

Bush admits that Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11 - YouTube

george bush is a librul

 

[Yurt]

this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

so dems lied...bush lied, the cia lied, most world leaders lied...

**** yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.

as long as you're cool calling dems etc liars...have at it

 

[Liability]

this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

You NEEEEEEED to mock it even though it is self-eviently and completely and totally true.

 

[Meister]

democrats were for more inspections.

which were done.

ask hans blix.

you will never own up to this, you scumbags.

maybe it helps you if i tell you that i am not an american. i am german.

it feels good to not be culpable for starting a war for a change.

With your half truths and not admitting to the actual facts, you are looking lame dude.
You probably don't remember when the inspectors were denied access to stategic areas for days, and only then let in to the sites....enough time to move what needed to be. If the democrats didn't want an invasion, they shouldn't have voted for it....PERIOD.
Sound more like your still butthurt over WWII when the Germans had their ass handed to them on a pewter plate, dude. Time to move forward...remember?

dude, you are the old ****, not me.

so don't try to bluff me with this "you don't remember" stuff.

now, get off my lawn, poser.

Get off YOUR lawn....really? What lawn would that be........

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Notice how the narrative has now changed with the LYING libs.. They got BUSTED.. and now they're on to a new tactic.. I don't give a SHIT about George Bush or anyone else for that matter who covered up this shit and left veterans dying and suffering.. He's a liar too.. like the rest of you liberal liars. YOU OWN IT.. FOR YEARS!

 

[L.K.Eder]

this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

You NEEEEEEED to mock it even though it is self-eviently and completely and totally true.

you think the invasion of iraq was justified because of the threat to the US, the threat being the chemical gas weapon remnants, aka the WMD?

 

[Billo_Really]

CIA, PENTAGON KNEW U.N. DESTROYED IRAQI NERVE-GAS ROCKETS

WASHINGTON -- American intelligence knew at the time that United Nations inspectors had discovered and destroyed Iraqi rockets containing 4.4 tons of nerve gas at Khamisiyah in 1992, the CIA said Thursday.

CIA, PENTAGON KNEW U.N. DESTROYED IRAQI NERVE-GAS ROCKETS.(MAIN) - Albany Times Union (Albany, NY) | HighBeam Research


Don't EVER let another LYING scumbag liberal say there were not weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.. They're LIARS.

There were no WMD's in Iraq after 1994.

U.N.: Iraq had no WMD after 1994

U.N. reports submitted to the Security Council before the war by Hans Blix, former chief U.N. arms inspector, and Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency, have been largely validated by U.S. weapons teams. The common findings:

- Iraq's nuclear weapons program was dormant.

- No evidence was found to suggest Iraq possessed chemical or biological weapons. U.N. officials believe the weapons were destroyed by U.N. inspectors or Iraqi officials in the years after the 1991 Gulf War.​

After everything that has been said on this issue, if WMD's had been found in Iraq, this is the first thing you would see the next day...

 

[L.K.Eder]

With your half truths and not admitting to the actual facts, you are looking lame dude.
You probably don't remember when the inspectors were denied access to stategic areas for days, and only then let in to the sites....enough time to move what needed to be. If the democrats didn't want an invasion, they shouldn't have voted for it....PERIOD.
Sound more like your still butthurt over WWII when the Germans had their ass handed to them on a pewter plate, dude. Time to move forward...remember?

dude, you are the old ****, not me.

so don't try to bluff me with this "you don't remember" stuff.

now, get off my lawn, poser.

Get off YOUR lawn....really? What lawn would that be........

mine, obviously.

 

[CaféAuLait]

The term, "Weapon of Mass Destruction," is ambiguous. A molotov cocktail tossed into a crowded bar literally and categorically qualifies as a weapon of mass destruction. As does an ordinary fragmentation grenade or a high-capacity machine gun turned against an unarmed and trapped crowd.

As far as a chemical weapon is concerned, it can be considered a weapon of mass destruction if used to optimum effect. But not any moreso than a comparably lethal high-explosive or indendiary device. In keeping with the topic at hand, the chemical weapons found in Iraq, which were purchased from the U.S. as far back as the 1970s and 80s, are long past their shelf-life and are no longer useful.

The bottom line is the widely accepted meaning of a "WMD" is some sort of nuclear device, from a so-called "dirty bomb" to a full-scale thermonuclear bomb or artillery round. So the lingering rumors about chemical weapons being found in Iraq are nothing more than attempts to justify the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq.

WMD's include nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons.

and the case for invasion was tried to be sold with the mushroom cloud (for obvious reasons) and with anthrax (for obvious reasons as well, if you remember 2001), not with sarin or mustard gas.

So which one were the democrats selling with all of their claims?

A. All of the above and they focused on gas and biologic weapons.

“Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 – 1994, despite Iraq’s denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq’s claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction.” — Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.” — Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration�s policy towards Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.” — Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

See previous quotes as well.

 

[hazlnut]

According to WikiLeaks, small amounts of chemical WMDs were found in Iraq and continued to surface for years after the 2003 US invasion.

You mean the traces of old chemicals found on the floor of some unused armory?

FAIL.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

CIA, PENTAGON KNEW U.N. DESTROYED IRAQI NERVE-GAS ROCKETS

WASHINGTON -- American intelligence knew at the time that United Nations inspectors had discovered and destroyed Iraqi rockets containing 4.4 tons of nerve gas at Khamisiyah in 1992, the CIA said Thursday.

CIA, PENTAGON KNEW U.N. DESTROYED IRAQI NERVE-GAS ROCKETS.(MAIN) - Albany Times Union (Albany, NY) | HighBeam Research


Don't EVER let another LYING scumbag liberal say there were not weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.. They're LIARS.

There were no WMD's in Iraq after 1994.

U.N.: Iraq had no WMD after 1994

U.N. reports submitted to the Security Council before the war by Hans Blix, former chief U.N. arms inspector, and Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency, have been largely validated by U.S. weapons teams. The common findings:

- Iraq's nuclear weapons program was dormant.

- No evidence was found to suggest Iraq possessed chemical or biological weapons. U.N. officials believe the weapons were destroyed by U.N. inspectors or Iraqi officials in the years after the 1991 Gulf War.​

After everything that has been said on this issue, if WMD's had been found in Iraq, this is the first thing you would see the next day...

You know what you asshole?? Desert Storm took place BEFORE 1994.. All we've heard is THERE WERE NO WMDS, PERIOD... from you sack of shit liberals... You got your ass handed to you and now you're moving the goalposts.. YOU FOOL.

 

[Meister]

dude, you are the old ****, not me.

so don't try to bluff me with this "you don't remember" stuff.

now, get off my lawn, poser.

Get off YOUR lawn....really? What lawn would that be........

mine, obviously.

I guess you have nothing once your lies were exposed. it must suck

 

[L.K.Eder]

WMD's include nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons.

and the case for invasion was tried to be sold with the mushroom cloud (for obvious reasons) and with anthrax (for obvious reasons as well, if you remember 2001), not with sarin or mustard gas.

So which one were the democrats selling with all of their claims?

A. All of the above and they focused on gas and biologic weapons.

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.” — Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration�s policy towards Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.” — Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

See previous quotes as well.

what do you want to hear?

if you want absolution, visit a priest.

 

[Billo_Really]

whose call was it then moron, yours?

The UNSC. Their the ones who issued the resolution.

BTW, do you know what they're saying, when they finish a resolution with the term, "we remain seized on the matter"?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

According to WikiLeaks, small amounts of chemical WMDs were found in Iraq and continued to surface for years after the 2003 US invasion.

You mean the traces of old chemicals found on the floor of some unused armory?

FAIL.

NO FOOL.. You and all of the other LIARS in this thread got owned.. STFU

 

[Meister]

WMD's include nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons.

and the case for invasion was tried to be sold with the mushroom cloud (for obvious reasons) and with anthrax (for obvious reasons as well, if you remember 2001), not with sarin or mustard gas.

So which one were the democrats selling with all of their claims?

A. All of the above and they focused on gas and biologic weapons.

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.” — Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration�s policy towards Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.” — Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

See previous quotes as well.

The truth is stationary and can't be moved, the only way he has an arguement is when he moves the truth.....then it's no more than a leftwing nut's yarn.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Get off YOUR lawn....really? What lawn would that be........

mine, obviously.

I guess you have nothing once your lies were exposed. it must suck

which lies, senile old man?

and be precise

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Get off YOUR lawn....really? What lawn would that be........

mine, obviously.

I guess you have nothing once your lies were exposed. it must suck

lol!! It's amazing how liberals double down on stupidity .. even after they've been shown to be liars.. This is why they're called insane.. They truly are.