6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

Right?
It was illegal to hit the boat the 2nd time because there were survivors from the initial strike?
Abject nonsense.
Did you watch the video at all ? There was no boat just debris the two survivors were hanging onto.
 
Right?
It was illegal to hit the boat the 2nd time because there were survivors from the initial strike?
Abject nonsense.
I tried to search for that video on the internet. It's no longer available but there are all these propaganda videos about double strikes being used. This is a propaganda campaign. Now I'm certain they are trying to cover up the fact that they blew up a boat that wasn't carrying drugs. Wakeuppeople ! You're being scammed !
 
I tried to search for that video on the internet. It's no longer available but there are all these propaganda videos about double strikes being used. This is a propaganda campaign. Now I'm certain they are trying to cover up the fact that they blew up a boat that wasn't carrying drugs.
They were fishing for tuna right
 
No you are absolutely wrong. The facts support my conclusion. A blind man could see that.You called me a reject. You are as big a pickup as Hegseth is. You and he should have both been kicked out of the military. The UCMJ and the Geneva Convention are the foundations our military stands on. You have no honor.
there is no requirement in the Geneva convention or the UCMJ to cease fire on an active target nor to ceasefire because the boat is damaged. Link to the article of both that says so or shut up liar,
 
there is no requirement in the Geneva convention or the UCMJ to cease fire on an active target nor to ceasefire because the boat is damaged. Link to the article of both that says so or shut up liar,
These people would tell you once you set an enemy tank on fire, you can't shoot the crew trying to bail out.
 
Last edited:
there is no requirement in the Geneva convention or the UCMJ to cease fire on an active target nor to ceasefire because the boat is damaged. Link to the article of both that says so or shut up liar,
Active ? You looked up the wrong requirement. You are an idiot..
 
it was an active target reject now either post the links to Geneva convention or UCMJ tell a service member to not shoot at the enemy cause we damaged them.
I can't post things on this track phone. It's all I've got. But I stand by everything I've said and I'm not running a cover up campaign like the one going on now. They're trying desperately to make this disappear. Guess what , it's not going to !
 
15th post
The idea is to transport drugs not people. This makes no sense. It just doesn't add up. People instead of cargo. Think !
Dont people have to load the drugs and guard the drugs.
 
Dont people have to load the drugs and guard the drugs.
There are people to do that at the destination point. And how much protection do you need in the open seas. Why are you trying so hard to protect obvious war crimes.
 
There are people to do that at the destination point. And how much protection do you need in the open seas. Why are you trying so hard to protect obvious war crimes.
Who cares why are you defending drug dealers. Is your order going to be delayed
 
Back
Top Bottom