6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

[pknopp]

Great lengths. How funny. I simply asked you to present the numbers. You didn't because you can't.

The article I posted (if you had bothered to read it) noted 170 citizens illegally detained/arrested.

Show me the quote where I said violating peoples rights was OK. That actual quote. Let's see it.

Quit making excuses. Quit supporting it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

How is reminding them of their legal oath suborning mutiny?

See post 145.

 

[Marener]

Because the democrat pols have not defined an alleged illegal order

A private or even an officer is asking to be hung out to dry if they defy a lawful order that they may think is illegal

Thats too bad for the soldier, but even worse for military authority and the nation

What a weak justification.

You’re saying that members of Congress should be hung simply because they didn’t specifically identify any orders that are illegal?

 

[berg80]

Gawd, they will defend ANYTHING.

Even this. Death threats.

They've actually normalized the POTUS suggesting members of Congress be hung. Yet, I have no doubt it will get worse.

 

[OldFlame]

I'm reasonably sure these congress people are talking about military action against Venezuela based on the premise that their government is actively supporting and helping their citizens traffic drugs to the U.S.

I have not seen the evidence from our lazy media establishment that this is not true, but I haven't seen evidence from them or the government that it is true either.

So you see nothing wrong with their message and form of delivery?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Republicans say the military must obey illegal orders

Were you lying when you said this, or just talking out your ass?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

If you're going to troll, boy, take some pride in yourself and learn how to do it

If you’re going to participate in a thread, address the topic within it. Did Democrats commit sedition, and do they deserve to die for calling for members not to follow unlawful orders.

I understand you have dodged every single question because you have been looking up what Trump said in order to agree with him.

But hurry up a little. It’s been several comments and you’ve said nothing.

 

[TNHarley]

The one time trump told the truth was when he said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and MAGA wouldnt care.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you’re going to participate in a thread, address the topic within it

Pay better attention.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Pay better attention.

Trumpet is so crazy that even this ardent supporter of his won’t talk about sedition

 

[M14 Shooter]

Trumpet is so crazy that even this ardent supporter of his won’t talk about sedition

If you're going to troll, boy, take some pride in yourself and learn how to do it

 

[MisterBeale]

So you see nothing wrong with their message and form of delivery?

It is a bit. . . desperate.

They are members of congress, they should sponsor legislation that outlines their concerns, rather than these silly theatrics.

I don't however see the language they used as being "insurrectionist," rhetoric, anymore than Trump's speech at the capitol on Jan. 6th was.

It was strong political rhetoric only. . . . it was clearly intended for the constituents of their districts.



This is just politics.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The one time trump told the truth was when he said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and MAGA wouldnt care.

Were you lying when you said this, or just talking out your ass?

 

[Lockback]

The one time trump told the truth was when he said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and MAGA wouldnt care.

Well, maybe they deserved being shot.
Did you ever think of that?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It is a bit. . . desperate.

They are members of congress, they should sponsor legislation that outlines their concerns, rather than these silly theatrics.

I don't however see it as "insurrectionist," rhetoric anymore than Trump's speech at the capitol on Jan. 6th was.

It was strong political rhetoric only. . . . it was clearly intended for the constituents of their districts.



Just politics.

.

"Silly theatrics" YES!

.

 

[Mac1958]

Thats not parsing. Its their oath of enlustment.

Reminding the military of a military rule is an Insurrection now.

That's how far gone these people are.

I love how desperate they are to dilute that word. It's around their neck after Jan 6, and tough shit.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Reminding the military of a military rule is an Insurrection now.

That's how far gone these people are.

I love how desperate they are to dilute that word. It's around their neck after Jan 6, and tough shit.

.

You believe all that.





.

 

[toobfreak]

"Silly theatrics" YES!

Well, they say we get the politicians that we deserve. Apparently the Left deserve politicians which match their 50 IQs with puerile performance art.

 

[OldFlame]

It is a bit. . . desperate.

They are members of congress, they should sponsor legislation that outlines their concerns, rather than these silly theatrics.

I don't however see the language they used as being "insurrectionist," rhetoric, anymore than Trump's speech at the capitol on Jan. 6th was.

It was strong political rhetoric only. . . . it was clearly intended for the constituents of their districts.



This is just politics.

I think it's outrageous, and it wasn't only shown in their districts, so I'm not buying that either.

 

[MisterBeale]

I think it's outrageous, and it wasn't only shown in their districts, so I'm not buying that either.

OK, we'll agree to disagree.

Until and unless the administration coughs up proof that the plans for Venezuela amount to a "national defense," I'll stick with the constitution.