As has been pointed out 57 percent of 316 people does not equal out to most Republicans
I agree with that. What's your point? Polling has never been about asking the whole of a group, of the majority of a group. A sampling is selected. If you want to suggest that in this case the sample was not adequately a representative sample, then by all means make your argument. But to simply object to the fact that the sample itself was not a majority of the whole class is just silly and indicates ignorance and lack of education.
and the site that used the poll is very much a far left site
No doubt. Just look at the gross license they took with their headline. Extreme bias deviating from the facts seems very clear.
so I stand by my call of bullshit. It would be the same if a right wing site used a poll that said 57 percent of Democrats supported America adopting Sharia law to make peace with radical Islam I would call bullshit on that as well.
Very well. But I also stand by what I pointed out. PPP is a generally well respected polling company, known to deliver accurate results. Notice that I have not in any way suggested that they are infallible, nor have I suggested that there might not be issues with this particular polling. You call bullshit, I just think you're a little premature in drawing that conclusion based on a guilt-by-association type of reasoning. I've read the report, it appears to be generally sound, but there is room for scrutiny. For example, one thing that I noticed is that I couldn't find any indication as to the geographic spread of the selected sampling. It's easy to collect 300 participants in a small geographic region, and if that is what happened in this case it would certainly call into question whether the sampling is truly representative of Republicans or representative of localized culture. Also, if the sampling was done by standing outside churches across the 50 states, that would also give significant cause to question how representative the sampling was.