How did a steel highrise freefall for 2.25 seconds into its own foot print? 8 floors of freefall, straight down, symmetrically, requires that all support columns were removed on EACH floor simultaneously. This is impossible. Fire cannot do this, let alone half of this.
You claim to know what happened already, could you explain this to me?
And could you please take the time to watch the DVD when it comes out on youtube? Thanks.
Then what else do we know. We know you are of course insinuating a controlled demolition like all truthers.
What do we know about controlled demolitions? We know buildings have to be rigged to accomplish them. And while there are certainly questions and inconsistencies with the 'official' story, one thing has consistently remained missing from the evidence for a controlled demolition. Not a single soul has come forward to report suspicious activity that would have been required to rig the building. Not a single soul has come forward in a moment of guilt to confess to rigging either of the two towers.
truthers are full of explanations for their theories, but amazingly tight lipped when it comes to how the buildings were rigged to implode. Of all the people that said they heard bangs right before the collapses to the experts offering counter opinions. Why is it that we can't get a single person to come forward saying the witnessed the towers being rigged? Why is it that not one of the many peope it would have taken to righ the buildng has taken credit? Hell give me a missing person's report or something showing that someone who was gonna tell the truth is now missing.
So since no person has come forward saying they put Bombs in the World Trade Center prior to 9/11, we can throw out ANY fact that it is possible? What detective strategy is that? Where is this practice of investigating used? Would you like your type of analysis to be used on a murder victim in your family? It is absurd you are suggesting that since no report of someone admitting bombs were being planted/suspicious noises, then there is NO chance of it being a demolition. That is a very eye opening statement from you, and is not a great impression.
A building freefell for 2.25 seconds, This. Is. Impossible. Unless. Explosives. Were. Used.
It is on video, we have witnesses, we have evidence, we have video, we have forensics, we have corroborating evidence, etc etc. Why can't you look at THOSE facts, and digest those instead, rather than take some random assumptions and say it debunks the facts? Its not smart, its not respectable, and its not right.
Please, just open your mind, use your intellect, think deep. Put aside implications, facts are facts. Now a reinvestigation could help us answer any other factors we DONT know for sure. Which is required. 3000 people were murdered, millions of lives have been affected in the middle east, we are in wars, we have had liberties taken, we have spent trillions, why can't we ask the simple questions and get answers? Wouldn't you want to have a THOROUGH investigation that was not a fraud on this event? This event changed the world. We need to know the truth.
I have no disrespect for you. I know how hard it is to fathom this.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPlV99AVQE[/ame]
I'd really ask of you to watch this. If one video you could ever watch and sit down and 'waste your time on', make it this one. Be open, you have the mind, I can tell you're wanting the truth. Don't deflect. You CAN handle it. Trust physics, trust your eyes, DONT trust the governments reports.
