40 New Scientific Papers Assert that Global Warming is Horse Manure

[konradv]

Name the scientists working on oil money. Why do you want to lose money? Is your ego that sensitive?

Are you honestly saying there aren't any? How am I going to lose money? What does my ego have to do with any of this? Remember, I'm not a dimwitted denialist. Your sad attempt on distraction only works on your fellow fools.

You asserted there are scientists being paid by big oil so it's on you to provide names. Oil prices dictate economies. AGW BS restrictions on oil extraction stifle supply, drive up prices on all consumer goods and cost us all money. You included. Obama's first 6 years cost my household $80k. Most AGW proponents are closeminded in their AGW political hackery because they don't want to be castigated as intellectually inferior by their equally ego-driven ilk.

Why didn't you say this stuff in the first place? I'm not a mindreader. Your last post seemed disconnected and off the wall. Why do I have to name names? That's just a deflection. What is anyone supposed to think? Denialists rail on about scientists taking money to do their studies, so it should be obvious to you that those on the other side take money, too.

 

[rightwinger]

No wonder the number of papers that confirm AGW isn't mentioned; probably have to add a couple of zeroes to approach it.

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

They did the same thing with tobacco

Trot out scientists to say.......we can’t be sure

 

[JimBowie1958]

This poor weatherman is tired of all the cold temperatures brought to us by Global warming

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No wonder the number of papers that confirm AGW isn't mentioned; probably have to add a couple of zeroes to approach it.

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

They did the same thing with tobacco

Trot out scientists to say.......we can’t be sure

Horrible attempt at analogy. The government doesn’t offer grants to scientists to prove tobacco is bad for you. The economy doesn’t depend exclusively on tobacco as it does energy.

 

[GreenBean]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Read the article Mr rocket scientist b4 you stick your foot in your mouth again . or perhaps you enjoy feet up your ass.... 200 Non-Hockey Stick Graphs Published Since 2017 Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented, Global-Scale Warming

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We just had our coldest spring in recorded history here in KC

 

[GreenBean]

Climate Change and the Millions made from it

Climate Change has been very lucrative for Al Gore. Gore and business partner David Blood, onetime CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, co-founded Generation Investment Management (GIM). In a few short years they had produced nearly $218 million in profits. Gore used $35 million of this to invest with Capricorn Investment Group founded by Canadian billionaire Jeffrey Skoll, who was part of the team that produced 'An Inconvenient Truth', the Global warming propaganda flick, trife with inconvenient errors and distortions. This cinematic trash won 1. A Nobel Prize 2. An Oscar and 3. Grammy.

 

[Crepitus]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Read the article Mr rocket scientist b4 you stick your foot in your mouth again . or perhaps you enjoy feet up your ass.... 200 Non-Hockey Stick Graphs Published Since 2017 Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented, Global-Scale Warming

I thoroughly debunked this days ago. Read the thread.

 

[GreenBean]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Read the article Mr rocket scientist b4 you stick your foot in your mouth again . or perhaps you enjoy feet up your ass.... 200 Non-Hockey Stick Graphs Published Since 2017 Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented, Global-Scale Warming

I thoroughly debunked this days ago. Read the thread.

In your own little mind perhaps - posting some half assed talking points is not 'debunking' . You cam lead a horse to water but not make it drink and you can lead a libtard to facts and not make it think .....

 

[Crepitus]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Read the article Mr rocket scientist b4 you stick your foot in your mouth again . or perhaps you enjoy feet up your ass.... 200 Non-Hockey Stick Graphs Published Since 2017 Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented, Global-Scale Warming

I thoroughly debunked this days ago. Read the thread.

In your own little mind perhaps - posting some half assed talking points is not 'debunking' . You cam lead a horse to water but not make it drink and you can lead a libtard to facts and not make it think .....

Stop posting before you read the whole thread.

 

[GreenBean]

No wonder the number of papers that confirm AGW isn't mentioned; probably have to add a couple of zeroes to approach it.

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

Name the scientists working on oil money.
Why do you want to lose money? Is your ego that sensitive?

There are researchers funded by the coal and oil industry - so what ? They aren't 'raking in the big bucks' ... they are lending valid fact based opinions - to the dialogues - they are not allowing socialist sabatuers to frame the debate.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No wonder the number of papers that confirm AGW isn't mentioned; probably have to add a couple of zeroes to approach it.

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

Name the scientists working on oil money.
Why do you want to lose money? Is your ego that sensitive?

There are researchers funded by the coal and oil industry - so what ? They aren't 'raking in the big bucks' ... they are lending valid fact based opinions - to the dialogues - they are not allowing socialist sabatuers to frame the debate.

Fossil fuel research is about survival of the industry.
It’s not the racket that AGW is. Gov control is the aim and that is insidious, pervasive and destructive.

 

[westwall]

OK. You win. We've nothing to worry about.

For once you are correct.

 

[westwall]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Here's a few for the internet cripples.


http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959683617752845?journalCode=hola

Late summer temperature reconstruction based on tree-ring density for Sygera Mountain, southeastern Tibetan Plateau - ScienceDirect

Pollen record of the mid- to late-Holocene centennial climate change on the East coast of South Korea and its influential factors - ScienceDirect

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/39/2018/tc-12-39-2018-supplement.pdf

Contrasting temperature trends across the ice-free part of Greenland

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0184.1

 

[westwall]

Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.

Read the article Mr rocket scientist b4 you stick your foot in your mouth again . or perhaps you enjoy feet up your ass.... 200 Non-Hockey Stick Graphs Published Since 2017 Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented, Global-Scale Warming

I thoroughly debunked this days ago. Read the thread.

No, you have never "debunked" anything. Ever.

 

[GreenBean]

AGW

No wonder the number of papers that confirm AGW isn't mentioned; probably have to add a couple of zeroes to approach it.

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

Name the scientists working on oil money.
Why do you want to lose money? Is your ego that sensitive?

There are researchers funded by the coal and oil industry - so what ? They aren't 'raking in the big bucks' ... they are lending valid fact based opinions - to the dialogues - they are not allowing socialist sabatuers to frame the debate.

Fossil fuel research is about survival of the industry.
It’s not the racket that AGW is. Gov control is the aim and that is insidious, pervasive and destructive.

Re: "Fossil fuel research is about survival of the industry." Yes, their glass is half empty but the other sides is half full. Regardless of what the motivation is beind any particular research so long as they provide valid factual data - SO WHAT ?

If you have issues with their data, if it flys in the face of your opinions - then try to refute it with facts - simply stating that they may have ulterior motives for presenting factual evidence is not a rebuke

 

[DrLove]

I must have missed the "40 new scientific papers"

What you mean is that Povlovodova or Kenneth or somebody like that found 39 TeeVee weathermen to agree with him on ONE paper?

Breitbart? Well that explains THAT!

Nothing Unusual Happening in Climate Change, Over 40 New Scientific Papers Confirm

Oh wait - I drilled a bit further. This is the lamebrain child of legendary German climate denialist Pierre Goselin (NOT a climatologist or ANY kind of scientist) and his awesome site NoTrickZone.

Pierre Gosselin
Gosselin is the author of the climate skeptic blog NoTrickZone.com. He said he thinks humans have a "modest" role in impacting the planet's climate, but ultimately he believes "the forces of nature overwhelm anything man puts out." Gosselin owns a small business involving communication work for various industries. He has an associate degree in civil engineering from Vermont Technical College and a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona, according to his website.​

THIS THREAD RULZ!!

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

AGW

And a dollar $ign.

LOL, the "scientists" funded by the oil and coal companies are the ones raking in the $s and all they have to do is say they have doubts, while real scientists working on grants actually do research, write papers and subject themselves to the review of their peers..

Name the scientists working on oil money.
Why do you want to lose money? Is your ego that sensitive?

There are researchers funded by the coal and oil industry - so what ? They aren't 'raking in the big bucks' ... they are lending valid fact based opinions - to the dialogues - they are not allowing socialist sabatuers to frame the debate.

Fossil fuel research is about survival of the industry.
It’s not the racket that AGW is. Gov control is the aim and that is insidious, pervasive and destructive.

Re: "Fossil fuel research is about survival of the industry." Yes, their glass is half empty but the other sides is half full. Regardless of what the motivation is beind any particular research so long as they provide valid factual data - SO WHAT ?

If you have issues with their data, if it flys in the face of your opinions - then try to refute it with facts - simply stating that they may have ulterior motives for presenting factual evidence is not a rebuke

This thread is about refuting with facts. Again.
What’s more, Manhattan has not been under water since 2008.

 

[LoneLaugher]

OK. You win. We've nothing to worry about.

For once you are correct.

Oh yeah! For once, bro!

 

[westwall]

OK. You win. We've nothing to worry about.

For once you are correct.

Oh yeah! For once, bro!

Hey, you can't be wrong all of the time....well, you might be, but you shouldn't be!