You calling us names, is about your issues, not ours.
Good gawd, stop playing the victim.
You don't think I see how you post to other people? "Trumpsters" is some kind of vicious name-calling, is it? Aww. Go ahead and give me another term to use so that I don't harm your tender PC sensibilities in the future. I'll try to remember to use it whenever addressing you.
You people have fallen for the con, and you stick with him because he enables your worst impulses. Enjoy it while you have it, because this country will ultimately grow out of it.
1. I post to people with the level of respect they show me. If they call me names for no reason, I will respond in kind, but with just cause.
2. Trump; supporters would be good for discussion people that support Trump politically. But, it does not dimish or insult the people you are referring to, so you will probably not use it.
3. PC is not about not wanting to be insulted. It is rude of you to lie to my face like that.
4. Your assumption that we feel for a con is unsupported by anything other than your bigotry.
5. Your assumption of our "worst impulses" is just you calling people you don't like, names.
6. This country will never grow out off us wanting our interests represented. It might grow to a point where we don't get that, and realize that we will never get it again. That will not be a good thing. Shitting on people for no reason, does not generally lead to good things.
Using the term "worst impulses" is not name calling. (wtf?)
You're making snowflake college students look like Rambo.
You are not a victim. Man up a little.
1' Your implication was obvious. Man up and admit that. Illegal immigration is a real problem. Dismissing those who want it solved, as just having "Worst impulses" is dishonest and rude.
2. Ridiculing me as a "snowflake" for pointing out your bad behavior, is just you doubling down on your bad behavior.
3. AND it is you knowing that you cannot defend your policy positions in serious and honest debate. Because otherwise, you would not be holding on to these logical fallacies with such grim determination. You are in the wrong and you know it. That is why you are operating based on your "worst impulses".
I'm done with a symmetrical online conversations with people who can only see one side of a story. That includes you, obviously.
I hope I didn't hurt your feelings there.
Well, you expressed disagreement, and claimed that I was the one who can't see both sides of an issue.
You did not, state or imply that my motive was some type of personality flaw or because I was a bad person.
You did not challenge my man hood.
Oh, wait, you did, at the end, when you implied with your snide "i hope I didn't hurt your feelings there".
You couldn't just state your point and let it stand on it's own merits, or lack there of,
you have to go for the personal attack.
My pointing out your bad behavior, is not a weakness on my part.
AND, once again, since you seem unwilling to remember this, my point is my "Feelings" but my intent is to not let you people operate under different debating rules than us.
We cannot have real debate in this country, where Republicans are expected to operate by marquess of queensberry rules while you Dems are constantly lying and race baiting and making everything personal,
hell, now using street violence and censorship to silence your enemies.
NO. I will not engage in such a non-symmetrical conversations.