- Banned
- #41
If it's such a deterrent, why all the gun crime?^dunning effect
Of course 300 million firearms in the hands of the citizens is a deterrent, small balls or otherwise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If it's such a deterrent, why all the gun crime?^dunning effect
Of course 300 million firearms in the hands of the citizens is a deterrent, small balls or otherwise.
Why would gun crime disprove that the SA was intended to serve as a deterrent to a tyrannical government with a standing army?If it's such a deterrent, why all the gun crime?
That you think that you can keep a government in check with your pea shooters is hilarious!Why would gun crime disprove that the SA was intended to serve as a deterrent to a tyrannical government with a standing army?
Gun violence and gun accidents are a cost of freedom. It's like auto deaths are a cost of transportation.
Stop being so emotional about it.
Other nations don't have our level of freedom and liberty. Of course 100 million armed civilians will serve as a deterrent.That you think that you can keep a government in check with your pea shooters is hilarious!
Other free nations don't have our level of gun violence.
Other nations, like Canada, for example, are freer than we are. They don't feel the need to be packing when they go to the corner store.Other nations don't have our level of freedom and liberty. Of course 100 million armed civilians will serve as a deterrent.
The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
And you like that, otherwise you'd want to do something about all the guns.
It's not a deterrent, otherwise gun violence would be down, rather, it's a security blanket for men with small balls.
Why, are guns a disease? Ok, I can agree with that.1.1 million Americans need their guns each year to stop rapes, stabbings, beatings, robberies and murders...according to the centers for disease control...
Mr copy&paste. Go away.We don't need to do anything about guns......you moron...
We need to do something about gun criminals that the democrat party keeps releasing from jail and prison....it is their policies and actions through their judges and prosecutors and politicians that release violent, known, repeat gun offenders, with long histories of gun crime and violence..
I want to stop them....you want to arrest normal gun owners who don't use their guns for crime...you are the moron....
Americans with guns do not increase the gun crime rate and the gun murder rate...
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...
New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center
-- gun murder down 49%
--gun crime down 75%
--violent crime down 72%
Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware
Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
This means that access to guns does not create gun crime........
Why do our democrat party controlled cities have gun crime problems?
1) the democrat party keeps releasing violent gun offenders...they have created a revolving door for criminals who use guns, and will release even the most serious gun offenders over and over again....why? Probably because they realise that normal people don't use their guns for crime, so if they want to push gun control, they need criminals to shoot people.....so they keep releasing them....
2) The democrat party keeps attacking the police.....driving the officers into not doing pro-active policing, cutting detective forces so that murders go unsolved..........
Time for you to go on ignore.Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...
New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center
-- gun murder down 49%
--gun crime down 75%
--violent crime down 72%
Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware
Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
This means that access to guns does not create gun crime........
Why do our democrat party controlled cities have gun crime problems?
1) the democrat party keeps releasing violent gun offenders...they have created a revolving door for criminals who use guns, and will release even the most serious gun offenders over and over again....why? Probably because they realise that normal people don't use their guns for crime, so if they want to push gun control, they need criminals to shoot people.....so they keep releasing them....
2) The democrat party keeps attacking the police.....driving the officers into not doing pro-active policing, cutting detective forces so that murders go unsolved..........
That you think that you can keep a government in check with your pea shooters is hilarious!
Other free nations don't have our level of gun violence.
Other nations, like Canada, for example, are freer than we are. They don't feel the need to be packing when they go to the corner store.
I don't read what you paste, you're a gun retard. It's a mental disease, and I don't have time for mental cases.So....we have reached the point where you can't dispute the facts I post....so now you come up with that lame ass response....
So noted....
Other nations, like Canada, for example, are freer than we are. They don't feel the need to be packing when they go to the corner store.
I don't read what you paste, you're a gun retard. It's a mental disease, and I don't have time for mental cases.
If they can't own a firearm I don't see how you can say they have more freedom. They have less freedom. Not only should you own one, you should practice using it and become proficient with using it.Other nations, like Canada, for example, are freer than we are. They don't feel the need to be packing when they go to the corner store.
If we're safer, how come we have way more gun violence?If they can't own a firearm I don't see how you can say they have more freedom. They have less freedom. Not only should you own one, you should practice using it and become proficient with using one.
The federal law that established the Civilian Marksmanship Program makes firearms safety one of its highest priorities. This law specifically states that a primary function of the CMP is “to instruct citizens of the United States in marksmanship; (and) to promote practice and safety in the use of firearms.” To fulfill this responsibility, the CMP produces a variety of safety materials.
JoeBlows is an expert on penises .It's not a deterrent, otherwise gun violence would be down, rather, it's a security blanket for men with small balls.