Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Children do not seem to drive transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We isolated culture-competent virus in vitro from 12 (52%) of 23 SARS-CoV-2–infected children; the youngest was 7 days old. Our findings show that symptomatic neonates, children, and teenagers shed infectious SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that transmission from them is plausible.
Children are underrepresented in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case numbers (1,2).
Severity in most children is limited, and children do not seem to be major drivers of transmission (3,4).
NOW what does that mean?
The first sentence says children don't drive transmission. FACT!
But the last sentence says "is plausible"... BUT NOT a FACT!
Get your facts straight!
Not wearing masks and disregarding 6 plus feet of separation to contain it, is what has destroyed our country's economy! Thank you Mr. President and Trumpists!
4% of the world's population, 21% of the world's deaths of covid.
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Not wearing masks and disregarding 6 plus feet of separation to contain it, is what has destroyed our country's economy! Thank you Mr. President and Trumpists!
Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Children do not seem to drive transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We isolated culture-competent virus in vitro from 12 (52%) of 23 SARS-CoV-2–infected children; the youngest was 7 days old. Our findings show that symptomatic neonates, children, and teenagers shed infectious SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that transmission from them is plausible.
Children are underrepresented in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case numbers (1,2).
Severity in most children is limited, and children do not seem to be major drivers of transmission (3,4).
NOW what does that mean?
The first sentence says children don't drive transmission. FACT!
But the last sentence says "is plausible"... BUT NOT a FACT!
Get your facts straight!
Not wearing masks and disregarding 6 plus feet of separation to contain it, is what has destroyed our country's economy! Thank you Mr. President and Trumpists!
Not wearing masks and disregarding 6 plus feet of separation to contain it, is what has destroyed our country's economy! Thank you Mr. President and Trumpists!
Not wearing masks and disregarding 6 plus feet of separation to contain it, is what has destroyed our country's economy! Thank you Mr. President and Trumpists!
4% of the world's population, 21% of the world's deaths of covid.
Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Children do not seem to drive transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We isolated culture-competent virus in vitro from 12 (52%) of 23 SARS-CoV-2–infected children; the youngest was 7 days old. Our findings show that symptomatic neonates, children, and teenagers shed infectious SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that transmission from them is plausible.
Children are underrepresented in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case numbers (1,2).
Severity in most children is limited, and children do not seem to be major drivers of transmission (3,4).
NOW what does that mean?
The first sentence says children don't drive transmission. FACT!
But the last sentence says "is plausible"... BUT NOT a FACT!
Get your facts straight!
Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Children do not seem to drive transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We isolated culture-competent virus in vitro from 12 (52%) of 23 SARS-CoV-2–infected children; the youngest was 7 days old. Our findings show that symptomatic neonates, children, and teenagers shed infectious SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that transmission from them is plausible.
Children are underrepresented in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case numbers (1,2).
Severity in most children is limited, and children do not seem to be major drivers of transmission (3,4).
NOW what does that mean?
The first sentence says children don't drive transmission. FACT!
But the last sentence says "is plausible"... BUT NOT a FACT!
Get your facts straight!
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
So of the 80,000 teachers age 55 plus 0.05848% is wait for it..... 44 teachers between age 55 and up ALL because
of going back to school. RIGHT we should close down the WHOLE school system because of 44 teachers!
GEEZ...
Of the more than 47,000 suicides that took place in 2017, those 65 and up accounted for more than 8,500 or 18%
18% of 80,000 teachers is 1,537 deaths of teachers by suicide.... VS 44 from COVID???
The golden years are thought to be a well-earned, carefree time in life. But adults 65 and older now account for almost 1 in 5 suicides in America.
www.npr.org
But FACTS mean nothing to people who jump to conclusions!
Summary for those poor idiots... 80,000 teachers over age 55+ and 44 will die from COVID VS
1,537 teachers that may commit suicide because of isolation, etc.!
GREAT thinking folks!
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
So of the 80,000 teachers age 55 plus 0.05848% is wait for it..... 44 teachers between age 55 and up ALL because
of going back to school. RIGHT we should close down the WHOLE school system because of 44 teachers!
GEEZ...
Of the more than 47,000 suicides that took place in 2017, those 65 and up accounted for more than 8,500 or 18%
18% of 80,000 teachers is 1,537 deaths of teachers by suicide.... VS 44 from COVID???
The golden years are thought to be a well-earned, carefree time in life. But adults 65 and older now account for almost 1 in 5 suicides in America.
www.npr.org
But FACTS mean nothing to people who jump to conclusions!
Summary for those poor idiots... 80,000 teachers over age 55+ and 44 will die from COVID VS
1,537 teachers that may commit suicide because of isolation, etc.!
GREAT thinking folks!
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
Well I can't cite the CDC, HHS or FDA - They've all been corrupted by Drumpf.
A large new study from South Korea offers an answer: Children younger than 10 transmit to others much less often than adults do, but the risk is not zero. And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do.
The research shows that infected children, even those without symptoms, have higher levels of virus in their airways than adults hospitalized in intensive care units.
Children do not seem to drive transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We isolated culture-competent virus in vitro from 12 (52%) of 23 SARS-CoV-2–infected children; the youngest was 7 days old. Our findings show that symptomatic neonates, children, and teenagers shed infectious SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that transmission from them is plausible.
Children are underrepresented in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case numbers (1,2).
Severity in most children is limited, and children do not seem to be major drivers of transmission (3,4).
NOW what does that mean?
The first sentence says children don't drive transmission. FACT!
But the last sentence says "is plausible"... BUT NOT a FACT!
Get your facts straight!
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
So why are the schools still closed with just 0.000429% or 363 deaths between ages 5 -24?
www.wbur.org
