3 Teachers Fired for Refusing to Be Injected with Mystery Substance

[Rigby5]

One problem with that idea. The "healthy" were dying too. And you would have to lock up either the elderly and those with co-morbidities from the healthy, or lock up the healthy from the elderly and those with co-morbidities.

Because you can't isolate the healthy and the services they provide from the elderly and those with co-morbidities that would use those services, there's no functional way of doing that, it's as ridiculous a suggestion as controlling COVID by wishing on a star.

Wrong.
The elderly over 70 were 400 times more likely to die than those under 40.
So all you had to do is only deliberately infect volunteers under 40, and they you would have been able to divide Fauci's estimate of 2.4 million dead to achieve herd immunity, down to only 6,000.

You do not have to isolate the healthy from the elderly except for the 12 days when the healthy have deliberately become infected by volunteering.
This is trivial and easy, so could have been finished in the very first month of the epidemic.

 

[Rigby5]

Once you decide against full quarantine, then you want the highest possible daily infection rate, so that you achieve herd immunity and end the epidemic, as quickly as possible.
Lowering the daily infection rate results in a higher final death toll by making the epidemic last longer.
And the longer an epidemic last, the higher the % needed for herd immunity, because it has time to spread more widely.

 

[meaner gene]

The longer you stretch out any epidemic by "flattening the curve", the greater the final death toll will be.
It is never going to end until you achieve the herd immunity number of those with recovery immunity.

The whole idea of flattening the curve was because of the medical community capacity to treat patients. What you suggest is like instead of taking an one antibiotic a day for 30 days. You take all 30 at once.

 

[meaner gene]

Wrong.
The elderly over 70 were 400 times more likely to die than those under 40.
So all you had to do is only deliberately infect volunteers under 40, and they you would have been able to divide Fauci's estimate of 2.4 million dead to achieve herd immunity, down to only 6,000.

COVID-19 deaths by age U.S. 2023 | Statista

Between the beginning of January 2020 and June 14, 2023, of the 1,134,641 deaths caused by COVID-19 in the United States, around 307,169 had occurred among those aged 85 years and older.

www.statista.com

First, your numbers are all wrong.

Those under 40, which includes the vaccinated is 25,000 not 6,000. So without vaccination that number is at least double to 50,000 of your under 40 healthy volunteers dying.

The other problem is deliberate spread means that it becomes virtually impossible to put out the fire until it burns itself out. Which means any breech between the healthy under 40, and the rest of the population would be catastrophic.

Like when a forest fire being isolated jumps the fire line.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The glory of government overreach to the Chinese Bio WMD attack:
Great Depression that’ll make a hundred years ago look like a picnic.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

There’s zero scientific justification for forcing anyone to get injected with the mystery substance. But plenty of science showing severe medical complications and deaths of healthy people who got injected.

It’s all about Big Brother forcing you sheeples to submit to them.

“Just Devastating” – Three Teachers Who Sought Religious Exemption From Covid Vaccine Fired In Barrington (RI)

The sincere religious beliefs of Brittany DiOrio, Stephanie Hines, and Kerri Thurber, who were willing to follow safety protocols, were uncontested. The District called their presence an "undue burden." Says Hines: We are “three Christian women that stood up and said this isn’t in accordance...

legalinsurrection.com

It's ok, they can retire on what they'll make from their lawsuits.