3 stupid myths republicans believe

[velvtacheeze]

several Democrats are on record promising to de-fund the Iraq War if elected to a MAJORITY in 2006; which they were

Google is your friend dope

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

 

[bedowin62]

So what should we be doing about these problems?

am i the President leftard?

how about we elect more than a community organizer next time?

Lame-o dodge.

I can't blame you for not replying substantively though, since your side has no substance, and no idea what it's doing, which we saw during the Bush War Monkey's Iraq Debacle.

what am i dodging you dope?

what does what my opinion have to do with obama failing?

 

[bedowin62]

several Democrats are on record promising to de-fund the Iraq War if elected to a MAJORITY in 2006; which they were

Google is your friend dope

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

YAWN
again; the war ended on the original Bush timetable

 

[dannyboys]

Here's a fact that REPs know is true:
"Socialism works great until you run out of other peoples money to spend" M. Thatcher

 

[Oldstyle]

yes obama is such a foreign policy triumph leftard.

reported this week; Iran is cheating on it's uranium enrichment program. Syria has turned over about 4% if its chemical weapons to its buddy Russia.
the US delegation to the Ukraine cant even get a call back from Ukranian officials.

it looks like North Korea is getting ready to test another nuke

hamid karzia told obama to mind his own business; and refuses to sign agreements

ur a JOKE

So what should we be doing about these problems?

So when your President attempts to deal with all of these problems...and fails miserably...you ask why it's even our problem in the first place? Typical...

We're one of the world's few super powers. We're one of the few countries in a position to prevent the bad guys from doing terrible things. Why is it OUR problem? Because much of the world looks to the US for help when they are dealing with the Assads, the Saddam Husseins, and the Kim Jong-ils. It's our problem because we've always told people that we will defend freedom. That isn't a Republican or Democratic message...it's one that JFK articulated forcefully in many of his speeches...just as FDR did and Reagan and Clinton and the Bushes.

 

[velvtacheeze]

several Democrats are on record promising to de-fund the Iraq War if elected to a MAJORITY in 2006; which they were

Google is your friend dope

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

YAWN
again; the war ended on the original Bush timetable

A timetable IMPOSED on him by the Iraqis, against his will, and against most of the GOP and conservative movement's will.

Sorry, but the GOP does not get credit for doing something that their heart wasn't in. Most conservatives wanted an unending occupation of Iraq, and many are still angry we aren't in Iraq today.

 

[Oldstyle]

several Democrats are on record promising to de-fund the Iraq War if elected to a MAJORITY in 2006; which they were

Google is your friend dope

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

Would that be the President who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then authorized his very own "surge"? Is that the guy you're talking about? The one who has mismanaged the Middle East so badly that the Taliban is back taking control in Afghanistan while Iraq heads towards civil war? "Proper and responsible"? More like clueless and irresponsible...

 

[velvtacheeze]

am i the President leftard?

how about we elect more than a community organizer next time?

Lame-o dodge.

I can't blame you for not replying substantively though, since your side has no substance, and no idea what it's doing, which we saw during the Bush War Monkey's Iraq Debacle.

what am i dodging you dope?

what does what my opinion have to do with obama failing?

The dodge is your refusal to say what you think the US should be doing instead.

C'mon. Let us learn from you.

I mean, I understand that the GOP's warmongering is really awful politics, and that conservatives have to find roundabout ways to call for a more aggressive military response without sounding like they haven't learned any lessons from the Iraq War. The crushing election losses suffered by the GOP after their Iraq War flop was tough to take, I get that.

 

[velvtacheeze]

several Democrats are on record promising to de-fund the Iraq War if elected to a MAJORITY in 2006; which they were

Google is your friend dope

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

Would that be the President who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then authorized his very own "surge"? Is that the guy you're talking about? The one who has mismanaged the Middle East so badly that the Taliban is back taking control in Afghanistan while Iraq heads towards civil war? "Proper and responsible"? More like clueless and irresponsible...

Iraq would not be the mess it is today if Saddam were there. Now it's besties with Iran. Smooth move there, Republicans. Way to go, war monkeys.

 

[Oldstyle]

The fact of the matter is that Barack Obama's Middle East "strategy" doesn't even exist at this point! It's all gone to shit there and he doesn't have the FAINTEST idea what to do about it. He started his first term off with his "Cairo Speech" where he apologized to the Arab world for America's past behavior. What Barry seemed to think would happen is that he would win over Arab fundamentalists with the sheer POWER of his personality and they would change their minds about destroying the West. It's the kind of naive thinking that a seasoned statesman would know was going to lead to disaster...but for a clueless community organizer it made perfect sense...treat the bad guys nice and they'll treat you nice in return!

 

[bedowin62]

yes; isnt it amazing? the Left; so adept at talking out of both sides of their mouths; at once announces obama's foreign policy is a "triumph' over what we have previously; then, when confronted with evidence to the contrary throw up their hands and as "well what would you have done"?


obama's foreign policy blunders are many; from his idiotic red "reset" button; incorrect translation and all; to his red line COWBOY-LIKE puffery on Syria

now after dodging what i said; the sem left-winger accuses me of dodging.
i said obama should have been able to build a coaltion of the willing on Syria; it isnt a Fox News talkig point to point out the Left DID brag how obama was going to "bring respect back" for the USA. but again we are dealing with libs talking out of both sides of their mouths. I also mentioned the United Nations; i got back...............crickets

 

[ScienceRocks]

Would you bomb the shit out of Syria? Answer me this, asshole.

 

[The Rabbi]

Would you bomb the shit out of Syria? Answer me this, asshole.

Would you draw a clear red line on Syria? Answer us, fuckwad.

 

[Oldstyle]

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

Would that be the President who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then authorized his very own "surge"? Is that the guy you're talking about? The one who has mismanaged the Middle East so badly that the Taliban is back taking control in Afghanistan while Iraq heads towards civil war? "Proper and responsible"? More like clueless and irresponsible...

Iraq would not be the mess it is today if Saddam were there. Now it's besties with Iran. Smooth move there, Republicans. Way to go, war monkeys.

Wow, now THAT is a statement! Iraq would be better off with Saddam Hussein in power? This is the guy who used WMD's on his neighbors as well as his own people? The man responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people? A sadistic sociopath with dreams of becoming the next Nebuchadnezzar. Getting rid of him was the best thing that ever happened to Iraq. Saying Iraq was better with Saddam Hussein in power is like saying Nazi Germany was better off with Hitler because the Cold War made a mess of post war East Germany!

 

[bedowin62]

So? That doesn't mean it was official Democratic Party policy. Besides, the war couldn't really be ended the proper and responsible way until we replaced the GOP Warmongerers with a Democratic President, which we thankfully did.

Would that be the President who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then authorized his very own "surge"? Is that the guy you're talking about? The one who has mismanaged the Middle East so badly that the Taliban is back taking control in Afghanistan while Iraq heads towards civil war? "Proper and responsible"? More like clueless and irresponsible...

Iraq would not be the mess it is today if Saddam were there. Now it's besties with Iran. Smooth move there, Republicans. Way to go, war monkeys.

good one stupid; y ou must have forgotten regime change was the OFFICIAL policy of the Clinton adminnistration regarding iraq. do you left-wing nutjobs EVER say anything that you dont mean? ever stop lying?
also must have forgotten your next Presidential nominee voted to go to war with Iraq; and your current Secretary of State. Iraq has moved closer to Iran SINCE OBAMA HAS BEEN PRESIDENT genius. can you blame them? they dont trust your community organizer either

 

[The Rabbi]

Would that be the President who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then authorized his very own "surge"? Is that the guy you're talking about? The one who has mismanaged the Middle East so badly that the Taliban is back taking control in Afghanistan while Iraq heads towards civil war? "Proper and responsible"? More like clueless and irresponsible...

Iraq would not be the mess it is today if Saddam were there. Now it's besties with Iran. Smooth move there, Republicans. Way to go, war monkeys.

Wow, now THAT is a statement! Iraq would be better off with Saddam Hussein in power? This is the guy who used WMD's on his neighbors as well as his own people? The man responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people? A sadistic sociopath with dreams of becoming the next Nebuchadnezzar. Getting rid of him was the best thing that ever happened to Iraq.

And he was a state sponsor of terrorism for over 20 years. Yes, only in the world of the Left are people better off living under a brutal dictator. That's why they love Obama so much.

 

[bedowin62]

Would you bomb the shit out of Syria? Answer me this, asshole.

actually leftard; your Chicago Messiah threatened to do just that; even left open the option of GROUND TROOPS. and he even claimed he didnt hav to go through Congress to do it.

or were you in a coma when all that was happening?
as it turned out he did nothing; even though he insisted earlier action on Syria was a must for humanitarian reasons; that was about 100,000 dead Syrians ago

Fox News didnt make him say all that leftard; and HE did SAY IT.

you losers just wont take responsiblity for anything

 

[rdean]

One of their biggest myths is that if you don't spend any money, you can pay down debt.

Every businessman knows that it takes money to make money. How did Republicans miss that lesson. I guess their economic policy is just as good as their foreign policy and their understanding of science.

LOL...what every businessperson "knows" is that you can't continually spend more than you take in and stay in business for very long. That's a lesson that people in government haven't quite grasped yet because THEY get to run deficits and simply print money to pay their debts.

And why you think liberals excel at foreign policy is a mystery to me, little buddy...God knows that Barack Obama doesn't have a clue what he's doing on that subject. "Leading from behind?" Seriously?

Republicans didn't just destabilize the economy, they destabilized the ENTIRE Middle East.

 

[bedowin62]

Egupt wasnt a mess until obama decided his brother's Muslim Brotherhood organization was a good match to rule Egypt. ow did that work out leftard?

and libya wold not be run by al qaeda largely if obama hadnt saved all that sweet, light crude oil libya has for europe by raining cruise missiles on the country

 

[bedowin62]

One of their biggest myths is that if you don't spend any money, you can pay down debt.

Every businessman knows that it takes money to make money. How did Republicans miss that lesson. I guess their economic policy is just as good as their foreign policy and their understanding of science.

LOL...what every businessperson "knows" is that you can't continually spend more than you take in and stay in business for very long. That's a lesson that people in government haven't quite grasped yet because THEY get to run deficits and simply print money to pay their debts.

And why you think liberals excel at foreign policy is a mystery to me, little buddy...God knows that Barack Obama doesn't have a clue what he's doing on that subject. "Leading from behind?" Seriously?

Republicans didn't just destabilize the economy, they destabilized the ENTIRE Middle East.

LMAO!1

just comical watching a left-wing loser trying to make
Republicans be to blame for obama's foreign policy failures in this; the EIGHTH-STRIAGHT YEAR OF PROGRESSIVE MAJORITY RULE!!1



IDIOTS AND HYPOCRITES